Sometimes I just don't get anything right.
The link I posted to Nimtz illustrates
how this can be done ( my own work is unpublished or
I'd link you to it instead). The key issue remains, how do we
define velocity?
Original:
It could be defined, for a two way data transmission system, as
PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Superluminal cavity resonances was RE: Fast-food for
thought
At 1:53 PM 12/8/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Horace.
I wanted to address you points with the article text, but
the link has gone sour...
Anyway, I think your differentiation is moot. I can build
a radio circuit
At 12:37 PM 12/9/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
First, looking at the graph, we see the reference pulse/count profile
for light speed is spread over a huge range, something like
40 feet of free space. There is no need for any of the
experimenters clever messing with polarizing filters
or birefringent
Keith Nagel writes,
Yep, that's it exactly. The resonator has two modes, an
inductive
slow wave mode and a capacitive fast wave mode. The
capacitive
coupling permits energy to travel directly along the axis
of
the coil, which means the coil is a true resonator rather
than a simple
inductor.
that may be a good thing (grin).
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, December 08, 2004 10:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Fast-food for thought
Keith Nagel writes,
Yep, that's it exactly. The resonator has two
PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 3:54 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Superluminal cavity resonances was RE: Fast-food for
thought
At 2:08 PM 12/7/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Let's look at that graph again.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1/041110
Notice how the light
At 1:53 PM 12/8/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Horace.
I wanted to address you points with the article text, but
the link has gone sour...
Anyway, I think your differentiation is moot. I can build
a radio circuit that displays behavior EXACTLY as shown
in the graph.
Yes, but that is not *my* point.
The link I posted to Nimtz illustrates
how this can be done ( my own work is unpublished or
I'd link you to it instead). The key issue remains, how do we
define velocity?
Typo:
It could be defined, for a two way data transmission system, as repeated
meaningful transmission of data x over
Kyle wrote:
...if it *is* moving super-c, and
not just some distortion, it is important to think
about this, regardless of whether or not we can use it
at the present time to transmit something.
I agree.
Harry
At 11:52 pm 06-12-04 -0900, you wrote:
At 11:01 PM 12/6/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Hi Terry.
You will see from their scope graph
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1/041110
that the light speed pulse is larger than both; measuring from the peak like
that can be deceptive as they show. I
Hi Horace.
You write:
It seems to me that if the group velocity can be sensed at 3*c then that
constitutes data transmitted FTL.
Let's look at that graph again.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1/041110
Notice how the light speed delayed pulse is larger than the slow or
fast wave?
Horace Heffner at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:08 PM 12/7/4, Keith Nagel wrote:
Let's look at that graph again.
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1/041110
Notice how the light speed delayed pulse is larger than the slow or
fast wave? Let's imagine two machines as you
Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed that
information cannot be
transmitted faster than the speed of light.
Hmmmthe writers of the quoted article have made an
error in the above statement. It would be more correct
to say that it is confirmed that within the
experimental proceedures
...real fast-food.
A post arrived from another forum (Blaze Labs) which
some observers here might find intriguing (I cannot vouch
for the accuracy, but the experimenter is both credible
(genius-level perhaps) and credentialed, so I will try to
find out more details about the particular
: Fast-food for thought
...real fast-food.
A post arrived from another forum (Blaze Labs) which
some observers here might find intriguing (I cannot vouch
for the accuracy, but the experimenter is both credible
(genius-level perhaps) and credentialed, so I will try to
find out more details about
Keith,
I disagree with his conclusion, that the underlying
velocity exceeds C. This claim was made by a researcher
at Marquette
I can't blame anyone for disagreeing with this.
Yesterday, I would have disagreed also.
However, having had a little run at Google, there seems to
be a fair
.
The vacuum is tenacious stuff.
K.
-Original Message-
From: Jones Beene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 5:03 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Superluminal cavity resonances was RE: Fast-food for
thought
Keith,
I disagree with his
--- Jones Beene [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
...real fast-food.
A post arrived from another forum (Blaze Labs) which
some observers here might find intriguing (I cannot
vouch
for the accuracy, but the experimenter is both
credible
(genius-level perhaps) and credentialed, so I will
try to
Keith Nagel wrote
<>Try searching the archives of Aperion magazine, I seem to
remember more papers there.
Something recent:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1
Good
news for causality
18 November
2004
Physicists
in Switzerland have confirmed that information cannot be
Oops, sans html:
Try searching the archives of Aperion magazine, I seem to
remember more papers there.
Something recent:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1
Good news for causality
18 November 2004
Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed that information cannot be
transmitted
: Fast-food for
thought
Oops, sans html:
Try searching the archives of Aperion magazine, I seem to
remember more papers there.
Something recent:
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1
Good news for causality
18 November 2004
Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed
The world of light I know from daily experience doesn't fit into
an optical fibre.
Perhaps in other contexts the signal velocity of light does exceed C.
Harry
http://physicsweb.org/articles/news/8/11/10/1
Physicists in Switzerland have confirmed that information cannot be
22 matches
Mail list logo
