:43 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: EXTERNAL: RE: [Vo]:Ahern's ILENRS-12 Presentation - Energy
Localization
Ahern under-emphasizes the super-radiance and sub-radiance balance in
this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation.
DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance
I have seen many instances where the instantaneous value of a noisy system can
be many times larger than the average or RMS. Thermal noise is a perfect
example. I suspect that rogue ocean waves are in this category. The amount of
time during which the extreme amplitude excursion occurs
Ahern under-emphasizes the super-radiance and sub-radiance balance in
this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation.
DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance - proposes that certain spatial areas
can undergo intense semi-coherent energy excursions (localized energy
Dave,
Yes, a lot of stationary random processes will result in arbitrarily large
deviations from the mean, given unlimited time. I think the Fermi(-Ulam)
acceleration Ahern cites is different. Given the proper system
parameters, acceleration can be certain and (almost) monotonically
increasing.
Jones,
I read his patent months ago. He may address this there.
I need to re-read it.
LP
Jones Beene wrote:
Ahern under-emphasizes the super-radiance and sub-radiance balance in
this paper. If he had made DPSR clear, then there is no primary violation.
DPSR - Dicke-Preparata super-radiance
5 matches
Mail list logo
