Bob,
These theories also seem to support the radical conclusion (heresy) of proton
annihilation at relatively low input power. Holmlid documents the same muons
that CERN sees at much higher power.
However, with Holmlid there is the large gap in reproducible experimental
evidence.
LENR
skimo.com>
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Grand theory of Philippe Hatt
>From the strange coincidences department:
I was going to recommend another interesting GUT-type of theory (that of
William L Stubbs) where simple logic takes the place of complex mathematics…
and lo and behold, most of the former
>From the strange coincidences department:
I was going to recommend another interesting GUT-type of theory (that of
William L Stubbs) where simple logic takes the place of complex mathematics…
and lo and behold, most of the former links have gone cold, but in this one …
it looks like Hatt
Nigel and Jones—
IMHO Hatt’s theory of the nature of particles with mass and electrical/magnetic
properties is correct. His predictions are consistent with existing
experimental evidence and go way beyond the accuracy of existing measurement
technology to be confirmed as this technology
As you already know, I find this sort of work fascinating. The hope is
that looking at the data in a different way might result in seeing some
connection that has been missed when we just look at the standard model
and which might in turn inform our understanding of the standard model.
What
5 matches
Mail list logo
