https://www.degruyter.com/view/j/nanoph.2015.4.issue-1/nanoph-2014-0003/nanoph-2014-0003.xml
Low-loss, infrared and terahertz nanophotonics using surface phonon
polaritons
Polaritons can be pumped using terahertz pumping.
On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 9:18 AM, Bob Higgins
wrote:
> But, I think you
Interesting…
This cited work with photonic crystals would be even more relevant if palladium
hydride is a photonic crystal. Is it?
It could be … but I cannot find a direct reference for that. Yet palladium as
an element is photoactive, and it turns up often in a search of photonic
crystals
An experiment similar to Letts-Cravens.
http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0957-4484/26/23/234002
Experimental observation of anomalous thermal radiation from a
three-dimensional metallic photonic crystal
Abstract
We report some striking results on thermal radiation properties of a
Bob,
One interpretation of the input parameters and the use of very weak lasers by
L/C (comparatively) is that for them to see any anomalous thermal effect, they
had to hit a special resonance frequency in order to get results.
OTOH if a far more powerful laser is available and is employed –
Jones,
I don't think the Letts-Cravens experiment is similar to Holmlid at all.
They used two calibrated wavelength lasers superimposed on the cathode.
They found that when the lasers were separated by a specific frequency
difference in the 10-20 THz range, there was a peaking in the XP. For
From: Jed Rothwell
I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion.
JB: There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of
which was presented. You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are
not a nuclear engineer
➢ People who are nuclear engineers
Jones Beene wrote:
>
>- I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of
> which was presented.
>
>
>
> You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are not a nuclear
> engineer
>
From: Jed Rothwell
➢ I do not think there is any evidence for muons in cold fusion.
There is actually plenty of evidence along with plenty of data some of which
was presented.
You may not think the evidence is credible, but you are not a nuclear engineer
-- and senior nuclear engineers
Jones Beene wrote:
> Most LENR proponents do not want to talk about fission. Actually they see
> it as a deal-killer, so to speak instead of a killer-app …
>
I have never heard they don't want to talk about this. There were two
papers about it at ICCF-21:
Hybrid Fusion-Fission Reactor Using
Here is an opinion which almost no one who is not Swedish shares, as of now.
The opinion is that the bottom line for LENR (being relevant for the future)
and for this being the “best” conference in a while, really boils down to one
detail: muons.
Nothing else which has happened in almost 30
Axil Axil wrote:
Paul Anderson
>
Ah, it is here:
https://www.dropbox.com/sh/sp71necll4mfv2w/AABLXuUL0v3NrkY7BPYPKDA_a?dl=0=Anderson-Paul-1.pdf
It is not in the printed book, where I made my notes.
I have no opinion, but people who understand astrophysics say the authors
are wrong, and the
Paul Anderson
On Sun, Jun 10, 2018 at 9:44 AM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Axil Axil wrote:
>
>
>> How did the SAFIRE project presentation go...anything interesting?
>>
>
> Which author was that? I have lost track.
>
> - Jed
>
Axil Axil wrote:
> How did the SAFIRE project presentation go...anything interesting?
>
Which author was that? I have lost track.
- Jed
How did the SAFIRE project presentation go...anything interesting?
On Sat, Jun 9, 2018 at 10:02 PM, Jed Rothwell wrote:
> Here is something I wrote at lenr-forum.com:
>
> In my opinion, this was the best ICCF conference in a long time. The
> number of participants was up. The number of young
14 matches
Mail list logo
