Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

2012-08-08 Thread Jojo Jaro
Subject: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first instance of 1-8 keV should have read 1-8 TeV (it was correct in the second usage) and A negatively charged singularity would feed preferentially from POSITIVELY charged particles

Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

2012-08-08 Thread Chemical Engineer
- Original Message - *From:* Chemical Engineer cheme...@gmail.com *To:* c...@googlegroups.com ; vortex-l@eskimo.com *Sent:* Thursday, August 09, 2012 3:49 AM *Subject:* [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Just a couple of quick corrections to my previous draft My first

RE: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

2012-08-08 Thread MarkI-ZeroPoint
: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:32 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking at this new theory. Jojo - Original Message

Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag

2012-08-08 Thread Chemical Engineer
:* Jojo Jaro [mailto:jth...@hotmail.com] *Sent:* Wednesday, August 08, 2012 5:32 PM *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com *Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Re: Schrodinger Cat out of the Bag ** ** Stewart, send it over to Vortex-L and many here will look it over. I for one are very interested in looking