He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times by too
many people.
At worst, he is a paranoid business man due to having very real enemies. If I
were in his situation I would be paranoid too.
From: Jed Rothwell
His test are not enough to be death penalty evidence.
However the hypothesis of a planned scam can be eliminated (too long story,
not enough cash, bad communication).
He have said evident lies, evident mistakes that he refuse to admit, but in
a grey world it does not prevent to believe part of
, 2012 12:07 AM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Why spammers claim to be Nigerian when they are not
He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times by too
many people.
At worst, he is a paranoid business man due to having very real enemies. If I
were in his
At 02:06 AM 7/9/2012, noone noone wrote:
He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many
times by too many people.
Brilliant demonstration of how some will confidently state as truth
what they don't know, and then use what they have made up -- or have
believed from others,
Like the Wizard in Oz, you only have to believe...
On Monday, July 9, 2012, Abd ul-Rahman Lomax wrote:
At 02:06 AM 7/9/2012, noone noone wrote:
He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times
by too many people.
Brilliant demonstration of how some will confidently
Company
http://www.amazon.com/Only-Paranoid-Survive-Exploit-Challenge/dp/0385483821
** **
-Mark
** **
** **
*From:* noone noone [mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com]
*Sent:* Monday, July 09, 2012 12:07 AM
*To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
*Subject:* Re: [Vo]:Why spammers claim
noone noone thesteornpa...@yahoo.com mailto:thesteornpa...@yahoo.com
wrote:
He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many
times by too many people.
I agree. But it is unnerving.
- Jed
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
Problem is, if there were *one* independent test, by one reliable person,
we don't know about it or have any reliable report of it.
Yes, we do. Mike McKubre and I both described this. It was discussed at a
closed meeting. If you consider
Noone:
He is not a conman because his technology has been tested too many times
by too many people.
Jed:
I agree. But it is unnerving.
Calling Favoranti... Calling Favoranti... Please pick up phone number
six in the main lobby.
Time for a re-run:
Thanks for the re-run, Steven. I missed it the first time around.
It is fantastic and is founded on the premise that the Rossi reactor
works, but is possibly unreliable or unstable (which is roughly my
sort-of assesment); however, it's not ridiculously impossible.
The story shows why even a
I wrote:
Yes, we do. Mike McKubre and I both described this.
McKubre discussed it in his video lecture at Cafe Scientifique, at SRI. He
described the people who did the tests as people he trusts. I trust them
too.
- Jed
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
One thing is quite clear: Rossi does not want multiple independent
assessments. He does not want the proof that skeptics would need in order
to accept this to be available, because he could easily arrange it.
That is true. For that matter -- as
I wrote:
The only reason people such as Park and the Jasons matter is because they
have influence. They often pull strings and derail funding. They are
a nuisance.
The JASONs is a group of old-fart scientists who control a lot of funding
and who love to pull strings and derail other people's
I meant undue respect. Not undo.
By the way, I did not mean that a test by NASA would not sway anyone. Of
course it would. The dataset of successful cold fusion results has swayed a
lot of people already. It continues to attract ~10,000 downloads a week. I
probably know that in greater detail
At 04:27 PM 7/9/2012, Jed Rothwell wrote:
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax mailto:a...@lomaxdesign.coma...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
A dangerous game, even if he has a solid device, reliable, working
safely. Stuff happens. Doubly dangerous if he still has a few
details to work out.
I do not see anything
Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com wrote:
People who set out to transform society often end up dead.
Not technologists. Hardly ever.
The best of them. In the work I'm doing, it is suggested that we notice
that most of us are not doing anything that would make us worthy of being
Jed sed:
...
When I read this, I could not at first think of why it
bothered me. Then I realized. I have often said that Rossi
could not be a con-man because he inspires no confidence.
On the contrary, he makes most people I know want to run
for the exits. Now I wonder . . . could it be
In discussing Rossi's prey, it may be germaine to look back at this
statement, from a PetrolDragon contemporary, in The Magic of Mr. Rossi:
Acerbi: “In the years where he was working here, he didn’t produce a single
drop of oil, as far as we know. What he did was creating just a media event. He
had other
things I was considering investing in.
Jojo
- Original Message -
From: Robert robert.leguil...@hotmail.com
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2012 11:14 AM
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Why spammers claim to be Nigerian when they are not
In discussing Rossi's prey
19 matches
Mail list logo
