In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:25:14
+1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks Ed the Students guide is my main resource and I've read it. I was
just being thorough and careful before diving in to a room full of
politicians, scientists and others. Better me than you hey.
I have this
Robin van Spaandonk wrote:
In reply to Wesley Bruce's message of Sat, 26 Nov 2005 14:25:14
+1100:
Hi,
[snip]
Thanks Ed the Students guide is my main resource and I've read it. I was
just being thorough and careful before diving in to a room full of
politicians, scientists and others.
is building new refineries.
-Original Message-
From: Steven Krivit [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Mon, 21 Nov 2005 21:53:24 -0800
Subject: Re: challenging papers
snip
Now, as for what' s real at the present moment: The Burgan field
situation, though seemingly unfit for the NYT
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a good reason why noone is building new refineries.
This is exactly right. See K. Deffey's new book, Beyond Oil. No new
refineries, supertankers or pipelines are on order because the oil
companies know they will have no use for them.
One of the reasons
explosion of development.
-Original Message-
From: Jed Rothwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 22, 2005 2:58 PM
To: vortex-L@eskimo.com
Subject: Re: Peaked Oil (was: challenging papers)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a good reason why noone is building new refineries
Wesley, read the Student's Guide to Cold Fusion. Most of the major
papers are listed there and their importance is described. A simple
list of papers would not do much good because it is the relationship
between the various observations that is important. An untrained or
uninformed person
Wesley,
At 04:01 PM 11/20/2005, you wrote:
I've said to a friend that most critics of cold fusion can't quote or cite
a single paper critical of cold fusion. It's certainly correct in
Australia. but is it correct in all cases. What are the papers critical of
cold fusion and have we debunked
I've said to a friend that most critics of cold fusion can't quote or
cite a single paper critical of cold fusion. It's certainly correct in
Australia. but is it correct in all cases. What are the papers critical
of cold fusion and have we debunked them all in turn? We need a list and
counter
8 matches
Mail list logo
