Excuse me for jumping in late on this thread, not having followed it
closely, but this may be worth a mention from the peanut gallery (unless it
has already been covered)...
WRT the current squared hypothesis - there should an obvious way to falsify,
or to add a level confirmation to this.
I forgot to mention:
Tanya also confirmed that in addition to performing flow calorimetry,
they also measure cell and jacket temperature. This is the normal
thing to do. The original version of Fig. 1 showed only that
measurement, which was confusing.
Anyway, Tanya and I thank Kirk Shanahan
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:51 AM, Harvey Norris harv...@yahoo.com wrote:
I was not acquainted with the fact that an elevated neon tube discharge
from a top globe elevated capacity to grounded 20 ft tower would produce a
pulsed EM detectable by a guitar and its connected amplifier. Amazingly the
Test
- Jed
I sent two previous copies of this message but it did not appear to
go through. Apologies if this is a duplicate (triplicate).
. . . . . . .
Okay, I have now communicated with Tanya Zilov and Mike McKubre, and
we have worked out what's what with this and other calorimeters.
Let me explain.
On Jul 2, 2009, at 6:02 AM, Jones Beene wrote:
Excuse me for jumping in late on this thread, not having followed it
closely, but this may be worth a mention from the peanut gallery
(unless it
has already been covered)...
WRT the current squared hypothesis - there should an obvious way to
I wrote; As the designs improve magnetically, you can see the power
required drops, the current required drops, and the zero load to
angular velocity and the initial acceleration both increase
dramatically.
That should say: As the designs improve magnetically, you can see
the power
V,
This is a catch-all message for a couple different things in different threads.
1. John Berry: did finish the HV supply to charge the tube/capacitor. But due
to the current consumption of the tube in 'keep alive' mode and the desire to
have everything isolated from ground, I am going to
FYI:
Favorable CF article in EDN (Electronic Design News)...
http://www.edn.com/blog/40040/post/1750043575.html?nid=2431rid=4465865
Comment section overall pretty reasonable, but with a few of the usual ignorant
armchair scientists
that are still parroting 20 year-old info. They obviously
9 matches
Mail list logo
