[Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Roarty, Francis X
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be a

[Vo]:Evidence for Relativistic interpertation of Casimir effect

2010-06-07 Thread Roarty, Francis X
While seeking additional support for a relativistic interpretation of Casimir effect in a new blog http://froarty.scienceblog.com/8/relativistic-interpertation-casimir-effect-explains-hydrino-without-zpe/#more-8 , I got conflicting reports of half life acceleration and deceleration. I am

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Mauro Lacy
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Mauro Lacy
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be

RE: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
-Original Message- From: Mauro Lacy FR: A question that I just have to ask is could the entangled particles remain adjacent in other dimensions while being displaced spatially? ML: That's a very good question. A semi-reflection on a higher dimensional plane(or volumetric cross

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Roarty, Francis X
ON Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:37 Mauro Lacy said If for adjacent you mean that at least one of the coordinate values that define the position of the particles in a given higher dimensional manifold are the same for both particles, the answer is yes. I suppose that could be named dimensional adjacency,

[Vo]:Two positive letters about cold fusion in Physics Today

2010-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this: http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1

RE: [Vo]:Two positive letters about cold fusion in Physics Today

2010-06-07 Thread Jones Beene
From: Jed Rothwell Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this: http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1 One comment about the Miles contention that: “I have investigated cold fusion for many years and find that the

[Vo]:Accelerated flow around sphere or cylinder

2010-06-07 Thread David Jonsson
Hi Potential flow around sphere or cylinder is rather straightforward in fluid dynamics. i wonder if anyone has calculated what accelerated flow looks like? Since it is non stationary it should be more complex, right? Could two different stationary flows at different speed be used and then only

RE: [Vo]:Two positive letters about cold fusion in Physics Today

2010-06-07 Thread Jed Rothwell
Jones Beene wrote: Notably the percentage of palladium is tiny compared to oxygen. Nickel, zirconium and oxygen are there in substantial atomic ratios compared to palladium. Rossi and many others use no palladium. Surely someone on Physics Today will pick up on this bit of apparent

Re: [Vo]:Two positive letters about cold fusion in Physics Today

2010-06-07 Thread mixent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:04:01 -0700: Hi, [snip] OK - boron is one of many known oxygen getters, but there are others that are far more effective in that role - and it would not be a good choice for the job if there was not more to it than binding to oxygen. Boron

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread mixent
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400: Hi, I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one another. That means that the subsequent response of one is *correlated*

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread mixent
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:41:55 -0400: Hi, [snip] ON Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:37 Mauro Lacy said If for adjacent you mean that at least one of the coordinate values that define the position of the particles in a given higher dimensional manifold are the same for

RE: [Vo]:Two positive letters about cold fusion in Physics Today

2010-06-07 Thread Abd ul-Rahman Lomax
At 03:04 PM 6/7/2010, Jones Beene wrote: From: Jed Rothwell Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this: http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1

Re: [Vo]:Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum Entanglement

2010-06-07 Thread Mauro Lacy
On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote: In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400: Hi, I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one another. That