A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum
Entanglement
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement
Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil opposition
to free energy the thought of free communication must be a
While seeking additional support for a relativistic interpretation of Casimir
effect in a new blog
http://froarty.scienceblog.com/8/relativistic-interpertation-casimir-effect-explains-hydrino-without-zpe/#more-8
, I got conflicting reports of half life acceleration and deceleration. I am
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum
Entanglement
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement
Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil
opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be
A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum
Entanglement
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement
Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil
opposition to free energy the thought of free communication must be
-Original Message-
From: Mauro Lacy
FR: A question that I just have to ask is could the entangled particles
remain adjacent in other dimensions while being displaced spatially?
ML: That's a very good question. A semi-reflection on a higher dimensional
plane(or volumetric cross
ON Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:37 Mauro Lacy said
If for adjacent you mean that at least one of the coordinate values that
define the position of the particles in a given higher dimensional
manifold are the same for both particles, the answer is yes. I suppose
that could be named dimensional adjacency,
Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this:
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1
From: Jed Rothwell
Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this:
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1
One comment about the Miles contention that:
“I have investigated cold fusion for many years and find that the
Hi
Potential flow around sphere or cylinder is rather straightforward in fluid
dynamics. i wonder if anyone has calculated what accelerated flow looks
like? Since it is non stationary it should be more complex, right?
Could two different stationary flows at different speed be used and then
only
Jones Beene wrote:
Notably the percentage of palladium is tiny compared to oxygen.
Nickel, zirconium and oxygen are there in substantial atomic ratios
compared to palladium. Rossi and many others use no palladium.
Surely someone on Physics Today will pick up on this bit of apparent
In reply to Jones Beene's message of Mon, 7 Jun 2010 12:04:01 -0700:
Hi,
[snip]
OK - boron is one of many known oxygen getters, but there are others that are
far more effective in that role - and it would not be a good choice for the
job if there was not more to it than binding to oxygen. Boron
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400:
Hi,
I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two
*correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one another.
That means that the subsequent response of one is *correlated*
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 10:41:55 -0400:
Hi,
[snip]
ON Mon, 07 Jun 2010 06:37 Mauro Lacy said
If for adjacent you mean that at least one of the coordinate values that
define the position of the particles in a given higher dimensional
manifold are the same for
At 03:04 PM 6/7/2010, Jones Beene wrote:
From: Jed Rothwell
Letters from Miles and Kowalski. Google alerts brought me this:
http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1http://ptonline.aip.org/journals/doc/PHTOAD-ft/vol_63/iss_6/10_1.shtml?bypassSSO=1
On 06/07/2010 07:29 PM, mix...@bigpond.com wrote:
In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400:
Hi,
I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two
*correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one
another.
That
15 matches
Mail list logo