In reply to Roarty, Francis X's message of Mon, 07 Jun 2010 08:31:49 -0400: Hi,
I think the whole notion of quantum entanglement is nonsense. When two *correlated* particles are produced, they are like mirror images of one another. That means that the subsequent response of one is *correlated* to the response of the other (not caused by it). Take as an example a box containing pairs of red and blue balls. If one ball of any given pair in New York is red, then it's no surprise that the other ball of the pair in LA is blue, and it didn't suddenly become blue when someone first saw that the other ball was red. It was already blue from the start. The separation distance is irrelevant. >A New article : Spooky Eyes: Using Human Volunteers to Witness Quantum >Entanglement >http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=human-eyes-entanglement > >Could this be a threat to the communication industry? Like big oil opposition >to free energy the thought of free communication must be a concern to some. >Presently the communication is only temporary with a record that only stands >around 100 miles between sender and receiver. > >A question that I just have to ask is "could the entangled particles remain >adjacent in other dimensions while being displaced spatially?" >Regards >Fran Regards, Robin van Spaandonk http://rvanspaa.freehostia.com/Project.html
