Jouni. Your comments are still wishful thinking and misinterpretation of
what I wrote.
you wrote:
Nick, you are thinking too much of yourself, but actually your
understanding is thinner than you might think.
For example, IPCC does not differentiate old growth forests from
modified forests and
On Aug 19, 2011, at 5:37 PM, fznidar...@aol.com wrote:
I don't know why NASA say this. I believe that our high power
directional radar emissions would be very detectable and we need
not worry about atmospheric signatures.
Frank Z
Hi Frank,
Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a
In reply to noone noone's message of Thu, 11 Aug 2011 20:18:32 -0700 (PDT):
Hi,
[snip]
Krivit and other worshippers of Widom Larsen theory do not make any sense. The
reaction is not a weak interaction, but a fusion reaction. The neutrons are
supposed to be protons and electrons that become
In reply to Horace Heffner's message of Sat, 20 Aug 2011 11:32:03 -0800:
Hi,
[snip]
Using a mean earth diameter of 6371 km, a mean albedo of 0.3, and
solar insolation of 1 W/m^2, we have a reflected power of:
Solar insolation is around 1 kW (not 1 W) / m^2.
P = (6.371x10^6 m)^2 * Pi * 0.3
Horace Heffner hheff...@mtaonline.net wrote:
It is you who does not get it. Investing in a free energy scheme which
supposedly produces excess or free heat is not sensible without expert
independent calorimetry being applied which determines a total energy
balance for critical demonstration
Jouni Valkonen jounivalko...@gmail.com wrote:
I stumbled upon in the internet a very simple method for doing
extremely accurate (up to two or three significant digits, depending
on insulation) calorimetric analysis for any water boiler. Method is
simple and all measurements are accurate:
–
lame LENR H-Ni run report by Sergio Focardi and Francesco Piantelli, 9
pages, Il Nuovo Cimento, November 1998 -- recent news: Rich Murray
2011.08.20
http://rmforall.blogspot.com/2011_08_01_archive.htm
Saturday, August 20, 2011
[ at end of each long page, click on Older Posts ]
7 matches
Mail list logo
