Horace Heffner <hheff...@mtaonline.net> wrote:
> It is you who does not "get it". Investing in a free energy scheme which > supposedly produces "excess" or "free" heat is not sensible without expert > independent calorimetry being applied which determines a total energy > balance for critical demonstration tests. It is whoever is responsible for > due diligence that should be held accountable for failing to take proper and > sufficient actions to protect investor's capital - assuming there are > investors. > Are you suggesting that the public demonstrations done by Rossi, Levi et al. are the only checks that have been made of these systems? That investors have not done more extensive tests? That's silly. Why wouldn't they? What would stop them? Defkalion has said repeatedly that they have, and that they have submitted machines for testing to the Greek government. No sane person would invest in this technology without far more extensive testing than has been revealed. There are many good reasons why people would not want to reveal what they have done. It is regrettable, but this is business, not academic science. In business, people keep things secret. Back in the 1960s and 70s when IBM ruled the computer business, they would develop and begin manufacturing entire computers lines without anyone outside the company finding out *anything* until the day of the press conference introducing the products already in production. - Jed
