2012/10/19 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Of course, we must always remember that theory precedes phenomenon.
Irony I hope?
Real I'm afraid.
In fact sure Real, I observed many times.
But since there is no peer-reviewed theory for that decadence of science
it should be non existent. ;-)
yes
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 12:58 AM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
Axil,
Is the Focus Fusion Society (URL: http://focusfusion.org/) what you're
referring to?
-- Lou Pagnucco
See
Hello group,
Today, an official announcement about test results was posted on the
Defkalion GT forum:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=4143
As previously promised, we are attaching two files that contain a signed
protocol and a preliminary report by one independent
Test Results:
Defkalion demonstrated 1 COP of accumulated total energy output
divided by accumulated total energy input (exact total COP will be
provided in final report)
Defkalion demonstrated control of reaction (start, stop, increase, decrease)
Defkalion demonstrated a reaction output
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Exec Sum of Defkalion Test Review - Sept 2012.pdf [52.49 KiB]
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=31
By the way, I wonder if the way DGT blacked out some information in the
pdf above was *very* weak on purpose.
Cheers,
S.A.
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
Hello group,
Today, an official announcement about test results was posted on the
Defkalion GT forum:
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=17t=4143
Two videos have been added:
Explanation of the calorimetry set-up:
Names of the testers and the organizations they represent are still under
strict NDAs and have therefore been removed from the attached documents.
Defkalion will not disclose names.
http://www.lenrforum.eu/viewtopic.php?f=27t=749p=2692#p2692
My opinion is such, but I'm not expert, just trusting
Speaking of prior art, and patents, in recent threads here ... and looking at
page 10 of the DGT report, their device seems to clearly be employing the
teachings of:
http://www.google.com/patents/US20110233061?
Compare the drawings of the reactors. The patent drawing is almost identical to
as an exercise of young patent reader, after david French course I will try
to explain why I think it is not infringing.
http://www.lenr-canr.org/acrobat/FrenchDpatentsand.pdf
If David French can check my homework
it is not nanopowder of 3-20nm but micrometer nickel foam
as david french
On 2012-10-19 14:12, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
2012-09-07_Test Report Validation_Signed_No Names.pdf [3.52 MiB]
http://www.defkalion-energy.com/forum/download/file.php?id=30
An earlier version with names of this test report has been posted on
ecatnews.com, pulled from the browser cache of a user
what a security tragedy...
hopeful it is not Afghan war infiltrated agents list.
only the big boss of NASA might feel uncomfortable (yet happy secretly,
that they will be heroes soon, after bloody insults by the mainstream
scientists).
2012/10/19 Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com
On
On 2012-10-19 17:17, Akira Shirakawa wrote:
http://ecatnews.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/2012-09-07_Test-protocol-signed.pdf
On page 18:
Test observer, Michael Nelson, was asked to come in lieu of Micheal Melich due
to Dr. Melich's current constraints [...]
Michael Melich is on Rossi's
maybe are the current constraints the fact that he is in the e-cat
board...???
about Rossi, clear that he is lying all the time...
on COP theoretically limited to 6
on RFG needed
on DGT having nothing
probably on sales and delivery of MW e-cats...
add to that his errors, that he does not admit...
Are you in touch with David? He seems to have a genuine interest in the
field - so why no ask for his opinion directly?
Of course, he is located in Canada, but that is where DGT hopes to be
located in the future, so he may not want to comment - in the event that
they would seek his services.
I have no specific relation whith him, even if I appreciate greatly his
course on patent (yet I miss much of it probably).
Opinion from him, as he already have studied Brillouin patent, would be
great.
2012/10/19 Jones Beene jone...@pacbell.net
Are you in touch with David? He seems to have
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Akira Shirakawa
shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com wrote:
· Explanation of the calorimetry set-up:
(uploading in progress)
· Triggering the reaction:
(uploading in progress)
· Explanation of the calorimetry set-up:
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:01 PM, Alan J Fletcher a...@well.com wrote:
Just like Rossi --- last signature box on the main report :
On behalf of
[Redacted]
The customer?
Dr. Michael Melich
At 11:01 AM 10/19/2012, Alan J Fletcher wrote:
Unfortunately, the result is only that it SUGGESTS a COP of 1
Since Defkalion specs have COP in the 20-30 range this seems rather
disappointing.
The blog goes on to say :
The objective of this test was to get only COP1.1 with a noise to
Terry Blanton hohlr...@gmail.com wrote:
Gee, Jed, did you set up that flow calorimeter?
:-)
Not me! I don't do secret tests. I don't sign NDAs. If you don't want the
world to know, I don't want to hear about it.
I have no objection to people keeping secrets, but I do not want to hear
those
Latest News:
For easy HTML format see botton of http://lenr.scienceontheweb.net/ where
breaking news
referenced. Ahern, Santilli, Rossi, Zeocat, Thkeory, Videos and more.
M.
On Fri, Oct 19, 2012 at 2:15 AM, Alain Sepeda alain.sep...@gmail.comwrote:
2012/10/19 James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
Of course, we must always remember that theory precedes phenomenon.
Irony I hope?
Real I'm afraid.
In fact sure Real, I observed many times.
But since there is no
I wrote:
The only thing standing between Rossi and global domination of the energy
market is Rossi himself.
Assuming he is right, and not a faker. I trust I do not need to add that
caveat every time, for this audience.
- Jed
I decided to perform an experiment where less current was flowing into my cell.
I noted that 1 ampere of current still demonstrated sparks once the
electrolyte had mostly boiled away. The earlier experiments were using 2 or 3
amps so I was curious if a threshold effect was present.
The
On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 10:35 PM, pagnu...@htdconnect.com wrote:
... One needs very many
particles to describe collective effects. In the model wave functions of
Ciuchi et al there are no metallic hydrides, there are no cathodes and
there are no chemical batteries. Employing a wave function
Once again you need to read my papers.
http://www.gsjournal.net/Science-Journals-Papers/Author/913/Frank,%20Znidarsic%20(new)
Frank Znidarsic
Carver Mead
-Original Message-
From: James Bowery jabow...@gmail.com
To: vortex-l vortex-l@eskimo.com
Sent: Fri, Oct 19, 2012 9:19 pm
Le Oct 19, 2012 à 4:34 PM, David Roberson dlrober...@aol.com a écrit :
I still believe that this effect is of a chemical nature and not LENR. I
wonder if the concentration of heat within a small volume is causing the
carbonate to decompose and escape. There exists the possibility that some
Le Oct 19, 2012 à 5:27 AM, Akira Shirakawa shirakawa.ak...@gmail.com a écrit :
By the way, I wonder if the way DGT blacked out some information in the pdf
above was *very* weak on purpose.
I was wondering why the presenter in one video (Hadjichristos?) was wearing a
crisp, new NASA t-shirt.
27 matches
Mail list logo
