Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Once again - mistaken identity. I made no such pledge. From: a.ashfield Sent: Sunday, April 2, 2017 9:23 PM To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Subject: Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics. Brian, So your pledge not to reply to my posts didn't last

Re: [Vo]:Can 'Apollo Fusion' Bring Us Clean Nuclear Energy?

In reply to Jack Cole's message of Tue, 04 Apr 2017 01:25:43 +: Hi, [snip] >http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a25922/apollo-fusion-startup-googler-nuclear-power/ Not much on the company website. I wonder if they are going to implement the model I suggested here on vortex a

[Vo]:Can 'Apollo Fusion' Bring Us Clean Nuclear Energy?

http://www.popularmechanics.com/science/energy/a25922/apollo-fusion-startup-googler-nuclear-power/

[Vo]:got a 5 star review and I am now running number 1

I got a 5 star review and I am now running number 1 globally in pets and animals at Google. https://www.amazon.com/gp/bestsellers/mobile-apps/9408731011/ref=pd_zg_hrsr_mas_1_3_last Frank Znidarsic

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vBB8SgHazs 2017-04-03 0:05 GMT-03:00 Che : > > > On Sun, Apr 2, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Axil Axil wrote: > > As an ideologue, remember to alway keep your feet planted firmly on the > solid foundation of realism. > > > >

Re: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

This is a fun discussion, Jones, but an important aspect of this troubles me. You are likening UDD, UDH with sub-ground-state hydrogen; and the way Holmlid defines UDD/UDH, they are unrelated phenomena. Holmlid describes UDD/UDH as forming (near reversably) from Rydberg matter, a well above

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Axil Axil wrote: > If LENR produces tons of energy in the aggregate, it will also produce >>> tons of all pervasive and highly penetrating meson based radiation exposure. >>> >> >> If that were true, I would be dead. >> > I doubt that you have seen LENR, at least in any

RE: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

My dear friend Jones, Let me beat this horse one more time with Naudts suggestion that the hydrino and by extension, dense hydrogen, are all relativistic forms of hydrogen and your trepidation about suggesting time dilation is the only single effect that explains all the anomalies from the EM

[Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

Dense hydrogen is nothing if not cold. Its deflated electron, its sole contact with the world, has lost most of its angular momentum. How cold is UDD or UDH, and can it remain cold on contact with adjacent warm matter? That is the start of a house of cards - to be presented below. Last year a

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Jed, you suggest anyone reading the Penon report will have a Rothwellian negative revelation of nothingness. I may ask all our colleagues from this relatively inactive forum,: do you agree with Jed, or on the contrary they have the intuition of a successful test? The data presented in the report

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

You are right. It was Jones Beene. My apologies. AA On 4/3/2017 5:41 AM, Brian Ahern wrote: Once again - mistaken identity. I made no such pledge. *From:* a.ashfield *Sent:* Sunday, April 2,

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

yes http://coldfusioncommunity.net/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/0194.09_Exhibit_9.pdf and some e-mails by him etc. peter On Mon, Apr 3, 2017 at 7:48 PM, Brian Ahern wrote: > > Was Penon deposed? He is the central figure in the trial. Has he answered > questions under

Re: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

Bob Higgins wrote: This is a fun discussion, Jones, but an important aspect of this troubles me. You are likening UDD, UDH with sub-ground-state hydrogen; and the way Holmlid defines UDD/UDH, they are unrelated phenomena. Bob, Yes - for the sake of brevity in an already too-long post, all

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Was Penon deposed? He is the central figure in the trial. Has he answered questions under oath? If not, why not? The ERV is moot without his sworn testimony under fear of jepoardy. From: Peter Gluck Sent: Monday, April 3, 2017 10:15 AM

Re: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

I suggest that the ultra dense hydrogen based quasiparticle might be considered the hydrino. But not only hydrogen can form the ultra dense form. Water can also assume the ultra dence from as produced in cavitation. The water crystal discovered by Mark Leclair gives cavitation the ability to

Re: [Vo]: Rossi on atomic physics.

Muon radiation is not immediately deadly. We all have muons passing through our bodies produced by cosmic rays. These muons contribute to 12% more or less of the total background radiation loading that exist in the background. [image: Inline image 1] Muons hardly react with the elements in our

Re: [Vo]:Frangibility, Holmlid and "below absolute zero"

Fran, It is difficult to reconcile dense hydrogen with a relativistic electron. In rereading Naudts paper just now, it seems as if he could be describing the initial redundant ground state of Mills, as if there were only one level, and not deeper levels.

[Vo]:LENR INFO ONLY

http://egooutpeters.blogspot.ro/2017/04/apr-3-2017-lenr-only-some-info.html Please read my blog associate's posting:"A manager's mirrorr (II)" too.. peter -- Dr. Peter Gluck Cluj, Romania http://egooutpeters.blogspot.com