NELAS
>
>
> Are they connected?
>
>
> --
> *From:* Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly
> overlooked in LENR
>
mostly overlooked
in LENR
Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni.
From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
To clarify:
Variance of good catalyst
changes in polarity
across the billet.
From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com <bobcook39...@hotmail.com>
Sent: Tuesday, January 16, 2018 1:02 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
Axil—
Nic
from Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> for Windows 10
From: Axil Axil <janap...@gmail.com>
Sent: Sunday, January 14, 2018 6:58:13 PM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in
snew concept.
>
>
> --
> *From:* Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>
> *Sent:* Friday, January 12, 2018 1:41 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly
> overlooked in LENR
mo.com
Subject: Re: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
Arnaud, What do you fing interesting in the spin energy concept. I want to
learn more about thisnew concept.
From: Arnaud Kodeck <arnaud.kod...@lakoco.be>
Sent: Fri
d spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni.
From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
To c
Like Mizuno but Mu metal instead of Ni.
From: JonesBeene [mailto:jone...@pacbell.net]
Sent: Friday, 12 January 2018 19:35
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: [Vo]:Ferrous alloys and spin energy transfer - mostly overlooked
in LENR
To clarify:
Variance of good catalysts from
To clarify:
Variance of good catalysts from the ideal 2Ry = 27.2 eV in ionization potential
(the catalytic “hole”)
1) Molybdenum .07
2) Potassium .09
3) Rubidium.09
BTW - palladium has a fit at 27.77 eV (.57 variance) which is much
There has been recent renewed interest in spin coupling in LENR as the m.o. of
energy transfer at the atomic level.
As it turns out – nickel is not optimum for the spin transfer process - while
iron is the best, but iron is not good for absorption of hydrogen.
In fact Tom Claytor could be
10 matches
Mail list logo
