Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
Eric, See Guglinski at: http://www.journal-of-nuclear-physics.com/?p=462 The helical trajectory is related to cold fusion too, because in QRT the neutron is composed by proton+electron. Into the structure of the neutron the electron loses its helical trajectory, and the energy of the zitterbewegung is responsible for the excess energy that occurs in many cold fusion experiments, as for instance in the Conte-Pieralice experiment: in their experiment the cathode was melt, a result not expected by them, since there was not (apparently) energy available for the electron to do it. Please read about neutron synthesis from hydrogen at: http://www.i-b-r.org/NeutronSynthesis.pdf Hope this helps. The Great New Planet Earth starts NOW! The Positive Man Eric Walker wrote: Snip
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
Thanks, Ron, for providing this link. I'm pretty excited. Here's the abstract from Science: Tunneling of electrons through a potential barrier is fundamental to chemical reactions, electronic transport in semiconductors and superconductors, magnetism, and devices such as THz-oscillators. While typically controlled by electric fields, a completely different approach is to bind electrons into bosonic quasiparticles with a photonic component. Quasiparticles made of such light-matter microcavity polaritons have recently been demonstrated to Bose-condense into superfluids, whereas spatially separated Coulomb-bound electrons and holes possess strong dipole interactions. Using tunneling polaritons, we connect these two realms, producing bosonic quasiparticles with static dipole moments. Our resulting three-state system yields dark polaritons analogous to those in atomic systems or optical waveguides offering new possibilities for electromagnetically induced transparency, room-temperature condensation, and adiabatic photonic to electronic transfer. http://www.sciencemag.org/content/early/2012/04/05/science.1219010.abstract Some interesting points: the new particle is a boson rather than a fermion, and there is the possibility of adiabatic photonic to electronic transfer (for those, like me, who find the language unfamiliar: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adiabatic_process). My initial guess is that free electrons in the electron soup that were disassociated from H2 when it entered the metal lattice are combining by way of an intermediate process with the free protons that were split off. You need a flux of hydrogen in order to make free electrons and protons available for the intermediate process. Regarding inverse beta decay, also called electron capture, Wikipedia says, note that a free proton cannot normally be changed to a free neutron by this process: The proton and neutron must be part of a larger nucleus. So the hypothesis being developed here would appear to be at variance with that statement. My apologies for the slurry of newbie physics emails. Anyone who knows this stuff at a much deeper level is very welcome to comment on anything that would be manifestly impossible (not just unlikely) about any of these points. Some questions I have: in electron capture, a neutrino or a positron is involved; also, there's an X-ray and sometimes a gamma ray -- how would any of these details need to be modified by the scheme being proposed here? And what about the quantum numbers makes it difficult for an electron to combine with a proton in the first place? Does it have to do with their spin? Eric On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/**releases/2012/04/120405142156.**htmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120405142156.htm According to team leader, Professor Jeremy Baumberg, the trick to telling electrons how to pass through walls, is to now marry them with light. This marriage is fated because the light is in the form of cavity photons, packets of light trapped to bounce back and forth between mirrors which sandwich the electrons oscillating through their wall. Ron
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
That's fantastic. I'm a complete amateur, so I have to ask for clarification -- is the phenomenon behind the tunneling of en electron through a semiconductor, as described in the article, the same one involved in the quantum tunneling of an electron into a proton? Or are the two processes completely different, operating at different scales? The article is describing the tuning of the rate of tunneling of electrons using cavity photons. What is the wavelength of the photons being used in the experiment being discussed, and what is its relationship to the energy barrier being overcome? What happens if you increase the wavelength significantly? Eric On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/**releases/2012/04/120405142156.**htmhttp://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120405142156.htm According to team leader, Professor Jeremy Baumberg, the trick to telling electrons how to pass through walls, is to now marry them with light. This marriage is fated because the light is in the form of cavity photons, packets of light trapped to bounce back and forth between mirrors which sandwich the electrons oscillating through their wall. Ron
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:59 AM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: What is the wavelength of the photons being used in the experiment being discussed, and what is its relationship to the energy barrier being overcome? What happens if you increase the wavelength significantly? Sorry -- I meant to say decrease the wavelength!
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
Eric, See what hydride ion (proton and 2 electrons) looks like when locked into Ni lattice here; http://chan.host-ed.me/ Now oscillate by reversing the magnetic vector using a RFG. Last year I saved this ortiz clip as possible source of parts if I ever decided to put something together. "Achieved Rossi replication. Procedure: 1. Approximated apparatus with parts purchased from: http://www.plumbingfittingsdirect.com/press.html 2. Purchased band heater from: http://www.thermalcorp.com/ 3. Thermal couple and accessories from: http://www.plasticservices.com/Electrical/threadnozthermo.htm#TN%20Series and http://www.ni.com/usb-thermocouple/ 4. Loaded reaction chamber with Ni coated Cu nano powder from: http://www.canfuo.com/NanoNi-Cu.html and Fe powder from: http://www.jtbaker.nl/export/worldof/lab/search.asp 5. Cu fittings brazed. Manipulations in glove box. RFG Radionics Radio Frequency Lesion Generator RFG-4 Duplicated Rossi results with COP 6 and still creating steam after 5 days. H2 pressure release ends reaction. Hope this helps you. Reply unnecessary. Ortiz " Suggest you read Wladimir Guglinski Quantum Ring Theory which clearly explains away that extra energy which the Guys here love to expound about. I like to stare at the Chan image and imagine it oscillating between two mirrors. Another quote from Vortex which may clarify the concept: "it was pointed out by someone the importance of Fe powder influenced by RFG to both align Ni lattice structure and oscillate the hydride ion into such a state to neutralize the Zitterbewegung helical energy, thus reducing the barrier allowing a neutron to fuse with the nucleus leaving an electron in the hydride space. " Yes, yes, "cavity photons". A rose by any other name . Welcome to the greatest age about to begin. The Positive Man Eric Walker wrote: That's fantastic. I'm a complete amateur, so I have to ask for clarification -- is the phenomenon behind the tunneling of en electron through a semiconductor, as described in the article, the same one involved in the quantum tunneling of an electron into a proton? Or are the two processes completely different, operating at different scales? The article is describing the tuning of the rate of tunneling of electrons using "cavity photons." What is the wavelength of the photons being used in the experiment being discussed, and what is its relationship to the energy barrier being overcome? What happens if you increase the wavelength significantly? Eric On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 11:33 AM, Ron Wormus prot...@frii.com wrote: http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120405142156.htm According to team leader, Professor Jeremy Baumberg, "the trick to telling electrons how to pass through walls, is to now marry them with light." This marriage is fated because the light is in the form of cavity photons, packets of light trapped to bounce back and forth between mirrors which sandwich the electrons oscillating through their wall. Ron
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com fusion.calo...@gmail.com wrote: Another quote from Vortex which may clarify the concept: it was pointed out by someone the importance of Fe powder influenced by RFG to both align Ni lattice structure and oscillate the hydride ion into such a state to neutralize the Zitterbewegung helical energy, thus reducing the barrier allowing a neutron to fuse with the nucleus leaving an electron in the hydride space. Forgive my complete ignorance. Following is what I gather from the above description: 1. Under normal conditions, neutrons being created from some source (not mentioned here) are too energetic to react with nuclei in the system. In order for a reaction to take place, they must be moderated. 2. To moderate the neutrons, you have to neutralize Zitterbewgung helical energy, something you only see described on free energy sites. 3. To neutralize Zitterbewgung helical energy, you dope the Ni lattice structure with Fe, get hydride ions in there as well, and then subject the system to electromagnetic radiation (photons) at the right frequency, which causes the hydride ions to flip around. Where do the neutrons come from? Where do the hydride ions come from? Where do the hydride ions go? This more complex a setup than I was envisioning from the quantum tunneling experiment. In the article, there doesn't appear to be any need for hydride ions to get the electron to tunnel through a semiconductor; this happens due to obscure reasons connected to photon being bound up with the electron such that a new particle is created (a dipolariton). I was imagining a high energy photon (maybe in the gamma range?) binding with an electron, thereby creating a dipolariton which then would tunnel into a nearby neutron (a sort of inverse beta decay). The (slow) neutron would then proceed along the lines that people love to hate Widom and Larsen for proposing. All a wild flight of speculation, since I don't have any business even going there. But what I really like about the experiment is how it connects photons (e.g., the missing gamma radiation) with electrons and the modulation of quantum tunneling. Eric
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
I was imagining a high energy photon (maybe in the gamma range?) binding with an electron, thereby creating a dipolariton which then would tunnel into a nearby neutron (a sort of inverse beta decay). Sorry -- proton, not neutron: the dipolariton would tunnel into a nearby proton, creating a slow neutron.
Re: [Vo]:Controlling Quantum Tunneling With Light
From the article: *One of the features of these new particles, which the team christened 'dipolaritons', is that they are stretched out in a specific direction rather like a bar magnet. * *And just like magnets, they feel extremely strong forces between each other.* *Such strongly interacting particles are behind a whole slew of recent interest from semiconductor physicists who are trying to make condensates, the equivalent of superconductors and superfluids that travel without loss, in semiconductors.* Strongly interacting particles form condensates. These particles exchange quantum characteristics until they all look alike and become in fact the same super particle. If a condensate forms, then the Electromagnetic force becomes a short range force, because the coulomb barrier is shielded. When superconductivity is involved, it’s a new ballgame, and all kinds of strange things become possible. On another note, I now understand why integral was so coy in our conversations. I had the feeling he had the answer and was letting me twist slowly, slowly in the wind. If integral is right, I will need to learn quantum ring theory. But Brillouin Energy also gets good results using basically the same mechanism and they use standard theory. Success at cold fusion does not reliably pin down what is really going on. And then there is the other dozen types of cold fusion causations to consider, including cavatation, Arata powder, and transmutation in living things. The cold fusion puzzle is not over yet. On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 9:25 PM, Eric Walker eric.wal...@gmail.com wrote: On Sat, Apr 7, 2012 at 2:41 PM, integral.property.serv...@gmail.com fusion.calo...@gmail.com wrote: Another quote from Vortex which may clarify the concept: it was pointed out by someone the importance of Fe powder influenced by RFG to both align Ni lattice structure and oscillate the hydride ion into such a state to neutralize the Zitterbewegung helical energy, thus reducing the barrier allowing a neutron to fuse with the nucleus leaving an electron in the hydride space. Forgive my complete ignorance. Following is what I gather from the above description: 1. Under normal conditions, neutrons being created from some source (not mentioned here) are too energetic to react with nuclei in the system. In order for a reaction to take place, they must be moderated. 2. To moderate the neutrons, you have to neutralize Zitterbewgung helical energy, something you only see described on free energy sites. 3. To neutralize Zitterbewgung helical energy, you dope the Ni lattice structure with Fe, get hydride ions in there as well, and then subject the system to electromagnetic radiation (photons) at the right frequency, which causes the hydride ions to flip around. Where do the neutrons come from? Where do the hydride ions come from? Where do the hydride ions go? This more complex a setup than I was envisioning from the quantum tunneling experiment. In the article, there doesn't appear to be any need for hydride ions to get the electron to tunnel through a semiconductor; this happens due to obscure reasons connected to photon being bound up with the electron such that a new particle is created (a dipolariton). I was imagining a high energy photon (maybe in the gamma range?) binding with an electron, thereby creating a dipolariton which then would tunnel into a nearby neutron (a sort of inverse beta decay). The (slow) neutron would then proceed along the lines that people love to hate Widom and Larsen for proposing. All a wild flight of speculation, since I don't have any business even going there. But what I really like about the experiment is how it connects photons (e.g., the missing gamma radiation) with electrons and the modulation of quantum tunneling. Eric
