Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics

At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: Therefore if someone knows some high impact factor journals that has published recent could fusion findings, I would appreciate to have some examples. See http://en.wikiversity.org/wiki/Cold_fusion/Recent_sources This is a list of journal and

Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics

From: Abd ul-Rahman Lomax a...@lomaxdesign.com To: vortex-l@eskimo.com; vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Friday, August 12, 2011 3:12:23 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics At 06:30 AM 8/11/2011, Jouni Valkonen wrote: Therefore if someone knows some high impact

Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics

Thanks great many Abd ul-Rahman and also Jed. I presented devastating counter-argument to Finnish pseudoskeptics. That Naturwissenschaften article: Status of Cold-Fusion (Storms 2010) http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/StormsEstatusofcoa.pdf was something that might be worthy of reading while I find

Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics

This is a reasonable question, from my point of view as a cold fusion fan, serving as a unqualified scientific layman who has been offering painstaking, objective reviews of cold fusion papers since December, 1996 -- specializing in looking at all the common sense, nitty gritty details in the

Re: [Vo]:How to present arguments against cold fusion critics

Jouni Valkonen wrote: In summary, how do I disproof claim that all cold fusion researchers are crackpotters and all magazines that publish cold fusion are B-rate or less journals? If those are the best arguments your opponent can come up with, they have lost the debate. There is no point to