Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

2015-03-17 Thread Bob Cook
: Eric Walker To: vortex-l@eskimo.com Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 10:26 PM Subject: Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP) I wrote: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (511 keV) I think that should be: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (1.02 MeV) (I.e

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

2015-03-16 Thread Bob Cook
Mats and Bob-- This is an interesting spread sheet. My down load stopped at column AA, rows 169 and 176, for some reason and I could not read all the notes. It would be desirable in the spread sheet to include the intrinsic angular momentum (spin) associated with the particles and nuclei

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

2015-03-16 Thread Eric Walker
Hi, Just arrived from Bob Greenyer (MFMP): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1Ntgj0_CUo2U9Ic0lgoHEFgezpXZq6vIcbkD1LP2zLuk/ As Bob Cook notes, any β+ decay will result in annihilation photons: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (511 keV) Once the positron is produced, it will quickly find an electron

Re: [Vo]:Hypothesis to explain Lugano, MFMP 'Bang!' and Parkhomov observations (MFMP)

2015-03-16 Thread Eric Walker
I wrote: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (511 keV) I think that should be: β+ + β- → 2ɣ + Q (1.02 MeV) (I.e., two photons of 511 keV each.) Eric