> It should be a simple matter now to leapfrog those Italian cats.
>
>
>
>
>
> *From:* Axil Axil
> *Sent:* Friday, May 11, 2018 7:06 AM
> *To:* vortex-l
> *Subject:* Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems
>
>
>
> MFMP continues on with the discussion of the
mouse and the cat’ 😊 It should be a simple matter now
to leapfrog those Italian cats.
From: Axil Axil
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2018 7:06 AM
To: vortex-l
Subject: Re: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems
MFMP continues on with the discussion of the "signal" and t
; energetic emissions.
>>
>>
>>
>> Ain’t real science done at the lab bench wonderful! As Thomas Edison said
>> from his lab bench, ‘Hell there are no rules here, we are trying to
>> accomplish something.”
>>
>>
>>
>> *From:* bobcook39...@ho
;
>
>
> *From:* bobcook39...@hotmail.com
> *Sent:* Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:00 PM
> *To:* vortex-l@eskimo.com
> *Subject:* RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems
>
>
>
> Fran—
>
>
>
> Good questions!
>
>
>
> A good spectrum analy
rules here, we are trying to
accomplish something."
From: bobcook39...@hotmail.com
Sent: Thursday, May 10, 2018 5:00 PM
To: vortex-l@eskimo.com
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems
Fran-
Good questions!
A good spectrum analyzer would answer questions
Subject: RE: EXTERNAL: [Vo]:fueled vs. unfueled LENR systems
Axil, your distinction does answer my question whether the polariton condensate
alone is a source of LENR, you are saying polariton condensates and nano
geometry of metal surfaces can produce LENR and dangerous gamma radiation alone
Axil, your distinction does answer my question whether the polariton condensate
alone is a source of LENR, you are saying polariton condensates and nano
geometry of metal surfaces can produce LENR and dangerous gamma radiation alone
without any fuel. I know you mentioned the super absorbtion/rad
7 matches
Mail list logo
