Ken -- as Reed said, you've pretty much nailed our planned revenue
model, but it's good to see you come up with the same ideas, meaning
they arn't too exotic (and thus will appeal to potential investors.)
On Sat, Mar 10, 2007 at 01:50:54PM -0800, Ken Taylor wrote:
Of course, for *any* of this
On 09/03/07, Peter Amstutz [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This made me smile:
http://slgames.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/alternatives-to-second-life/
``Virtual Object System - Worthy of note purely because they share the
dream of creating The Metaverse. There's not really a lot to see yet,
but the
On Thu, 2007-03-08 at 23:46 -0500, Peter Amstutz wrote:
investors, please contact me. Since we're going for a distinctly
nontraditional business model (open source, open development, community
involvement early and as much as possible) some of this is uncharted
territory...
No it is not
Peter Amstutz wrote:
Regarding the last point (the funding, not the crushing), I am currently
working on writing up development and design plans and working towards
the actual proposal we will present to potential funding sources. If
anyone has any special experience writing proposals or
On Sat, 2007-03-10 at 13:50 -0800, Ken Taylor wrote:
Peter Amstutz wrote:
Regarding the last point (the funding, not the crushing), I am currently
working on writing up development and design plans and working towards
the actual proposal we will present to potential funding sources. If
On Thu, 08 Mar 2007 23:46:30 -0500, Peter Amstutz wrote:
If they every decide to go for VC funding, they could crush everything
else.''
Eh, let's hope ;-)
best,
Lalo Martins
--
So many of our dreams at first seem impossible,
then
This made me smile:
http://slgames.wordpress.com/2007/03/05/alternatives-to-second-life/
``Virtual Object System - Worthy of note purely because they share the
dream of creating The Metaverse. There's not really a lot to see yet,
but the reason is that they're taking a very from the ground up