On Fri, Dec 07, 2007 at 06:01:30PM +, Lalo Martins wrote:
> Also spracht Reed Hedges (Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:57:10 -0500):
> > Oh, ok, then my sketch is not really SOD, just a similar thing. Sorry
> > for apropriating the name. I didn't know that you implemented your
> > format (or forgot). Why
Also spracht Reed Hedges (Fri, 07 Dec 2007 10:57:10 -0500):
> Oh, ok, then my sketch is not really SOD, just a similar thing. Sorry
> for apropriating the name. I didn't know that you implemented your
> format (or forgot). Why wasn't it merged into the main S4 repository?
Hmm... ehn... that's a
Oh, ok, then my sketch is not really SOD, just a similar thing. Sorry for
apropriating the name. I didn't know that you implemented your format
(or forgot). Why wasn't it merged into the main S4 repository?
Here's the archive messages about it:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.comp.lib.vos.devel/
Also spracht Reed Hedges (Thu, 06 Dec 2007 17:46:37 -0500):
> Or you could use any file format for Vobjects, even COD. Back in S4 I
> sketched out a possible curly-bracket format called "SOD" I think
> (don't remember it exactly anymore though, maybe there's a message about
> it in the archive?
Karsten Otto wrote:
> Am 05.12.2007 um 22:13 schrieb Peter Amstutz:
>>> The interface description seems to slowly approach WSDL Land... Have
>>> you considered some shorthand syntax to free a developer of all the
>>> XML clutter? Or do you envision GUI-based development tools for this
>>> (really
