On Sat, May 03, 2008 at 09:00:30AM +, Lalo Martins wrote:
>
> For me this kills it. How much do you estimate it would set you back?
> And is what's wrong with the current design serious enough to justify
> this time? A good yardstick for that is: is the new design sufficiently
> better t
Also spracht Peter Amstutz (Thu, 01 May 2008 22:31:03 -0400):
> - It's going back to the drawing board (again) (not completely, but it
> does mean some work redesigning the VOS APIs, the XOD format, changing
> the code generator, etc)
For me this kills it. How much do you estimate it would set y
Some ideas for a new design for properties.
Replace the vobject "child list" with a "property map". A property is a
slot that holds some value, which can be a basic type (int, string), a
compound type (struct, array or map) or a reference to another vobject.
Reflection permits iterating over
