Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Christoph Junghans
2016-08-30 13:18 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang : > Dear Christoph, > > I think that bond potentials seem to be good with U shape using > csg_call --options options.xml --ia-type bond --ia-name bond > convert_potential gromacs Yeah, the attached bond potentials actually

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Chang Woon Jang
Dear Christoph, I think that bond potentials seem to be good with U shape using csg_call --options options.xml --ia-type bond --ia-name bond convert_potential gromacs The following potentials in figures are obtained from csg_call. I am not sure of forces though. With all those

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Christoph Junghans
2016-08-30 12:33 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang : > Dear Christoph, > >It runs smoothly up to 12500 iterations. After that the error still exist > as follows. Luckily, 10K iterations do not produce the error. The below error means a bond got stretched more than 2.02391 nm,

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Christoph Junghans
2016-08-30 12:22 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang : > Dear Christoph, > >Did you also change original bond and angle tables to gromacs format? I only looked at the dihedral! > > If so, how do I determine the min and max values for bond and angle tables? Basically you look at

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Chang Woon Jang
Dear Christoph, It runs smoothly up to 12500 iterations. After that the error still exist as follows. Luckily, 10K iterations do not produce the error. DD step 12499 load imb.: force 5.6% Step Time Lambda 125006.250000.0

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-30 Thread Christoph Junghans
Hi, thanks for sending the potentials. Here is what I did: $ ls table_d*.txt table_d1.txt table_d2.txt table_d3.txt table_d4.txt # These are the potentials out of csg_boltzmann $ cat table_d.xml dihedral -3.141 3.141 0.001 1e8 0.001 $

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-29 Thread Christoph Junghans
2016-08-29 15:19 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang : > Dear Christoph, > >Can I run ibi without dihedrals? Actually, I do not need dihedral > potentials even though CG molecules have dihedrals. Or, any suggestions for > debugging the dihedrals. Actually, the warning signs

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-29 Thread Chang Woon Jang
Dear Christoph, Can I run ibi without dihedrals? Actually, I do not need dihedral potentials even though CG molecules have dihedrals. Or, any suggestions for debugging the dihedrals. Actually, the warning signs disappeared but I have still the same Fatal error. Thank you. Best regards,

Re: [votca] warning

2016-08-29 Thread Christoph Junghans
2016-08-29 13:32 GMT-06:00 Chang Woon Jang : > Dear Votca Users, > >I have four dihedral distributions directly from csg_boltzmann. However, > only one dihedral distribution gives waning sign during IBI run as follows. > > WARNING: For the 359 non-zero entries for

[votca] warning

2016-08-29 Thread Chang Woon Jang
Dear Votca Users, I have four dihedral distributions directly from csg_boltzmann. However, only one dihedral distribution gives waning sign during IBI run as follows. WARNING: For the 359 non-zero entries for table 0 in table_d1.xvg the forces deviate on average 196% from minus the numerical