Hi,
1) Being able to cut/copy text from a page would be good.
2) If you refresh a page and things have changed (eg: cacheing a page on
your machine and adding missing items) they are updated.
Cya!
--
I work for the vice squad, the officer said arrestingly.
Andrew Bruno
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Yuk, does Voyager really cache from file:// URLs?
As for cut/copy of text, DIE FOUL INDIDEL! It's in the ReadMe that
you should never ever mention this :)
--
Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL
Hey!
But i thought that the development of voyager,stopped.Am i wrong on
this?
And if i am,will it be able to catch up the IB and AW browsers ?
Catch up?
IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with
some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins
for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript
mainly).
AWeb?! You HAVE to be kidding me. AWeb hasn't changed for 2 years.
All they did
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But i thought that the development of voyager,stopped.Am i wrong on this?
Stopped ? Slowed down is the better word ;) Extremely slow ...
And if i am,will it be able to catch up the IB and AW browsers ?
Well, I consider it light years ahead of the two ... but thats
Hello Matt,
On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
Catch up?
IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with
some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins
for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript
mainly).
The flash plugin for Voyager is close
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jörgen Danielsson
Sent: 13 July 2004 15:44
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: Voyager development ?
Hello Matt,
On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
Catch up?
IBrowse implements the same
Hey,guys!
Just look at this classic case of a Superior british :
I spit at your catch up comment! :)
No comment
AWeb?! You HAVE to be kidding me. AWeb hasn't changed for 2 years.
???!!! whatever you say
So if you don't like the progress of Voyager, you can
go away and use IBrowse, and
Well, that's it - no way are you getting back the Elgin Marbles
now :)
--
Matt Sealey [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Genesi, Manager, Developer Relations
Hello Matt,
On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
Catch up?
IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with
some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins
for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript
mainly).
The flash plugin for Voyager is
Bah, there's no reason to rag on each other like this.
I've used sites that I literately had to use each of the three
browsers to do different functions on the site. Had to use Ibrowse to
make a login, had to use Voyager to upload files, then had to use AWeb
to use the site's file manager. As
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Behalf Of Jörgen Danielsson
Sent: 13 July 2004 18:03
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [voyager] Re: Voyager development ?
We had tabs, we removed it because it was unstable, because users
requested that it
Hi,
First of all Voyager is nice.
Anyway why should be fair and honor where other browser are better.
Useless. They have native GIF, JPEG and PNG decoders anyway which
are much faster. What's the point of datatypes than to work around
the fact that IBrowse isn't PowerPC native yet?
Ibrowse
Hello everyone, Hello Matt,
I just read Matt's last email.
Matt, I think you are taking this way to personally.
I just wanted to say, if I would have read you last email earlier
then I would have not written my comments.
For your info:
I'm working for MySQL for a living.
Well, I personally
Sure, MySQL is a great product! But sometimes some people
need Oracle. That's a fact of life.
But you don't see Oracle users posting to the MySQL list
shouting MySQL doesn't do what Oracle does.. how it must
suck! It can't work or succeed if it doesn't surpass
Oracle!!!
It just plain doesn't
Hi Matt,
Thanks for your answer.
Sure, MySQL is a great product! But sometimes some people
need Oracle. That's a fact of life.
Thats right.
MySQL is still a good product even if it misses some features of Oracle.
But the same is true for Voyager. Voyager is still a good browser
even if other
Hello Matt,
On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
No you had buttons with similar functionality. Sorry but I like the look
of tabs. Speaking of support, there are more things included with
support than removing a buggy function.
Tabs (MUI register objects) are inefficient. When you create them, they
Hello Targhan,
On 2004-07-13, you wrote:
Bah, there's no reason to rag on each other like this.
I've used sites that I literately had to use each of the three
browsers to do different functions on the site. Had to use Ibrowse to
make a login, had to use Voyager to upload files, then had to
18 matches
Mail list logo
