Ahh! but the latest version of these, 16.1 dated 21 Dec 02, by Alfonso
Ranieri and Simone Tellini are available on Aminet or from
http://digilander.libero.it/asoft/
It is not essential to have these 16.1 versions of the classes.
The versions bundled with Voyager are the *minimum*
Hello David
On 27-Dec-02, you wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 21:17:55 +, Brian Sharman wrote:
Which ones?
The more recent ones I have are :- Speedbar.mcc.14.4 03.06.02
Speedbar.mcp.14.4 03.06.02
Here, on pegasos/morphos, V seems to work perfectly... Good job :) :) :)
EXPECT one strange thing which happens once in a while (the other program
loaded being SimpleMail) : sometimes, the requester asking to register (with
three buttons) appears unexpectingly and flickers/blinks many times
Hello Targhan
On 29-Dic-02, you wrote:
On Sun, 29 Dec 2002 15:03:14 +, Don Cox wrote:
There
still seem to be some stability issues with MUI programs.
Not really MUI's fault.
what's the best tool to track erroneous tasks with? MuForce? I would
prefer to give a more
Hello Franco
I've patched my Amiga-MUI to Pegasos-MUI ... works great ;-)
Got alot more performance =D
is it a joke . . . . or not?
Yep, it's a joke that I've patched it ... But the performance
of my pegasos compared to my now-dead amiga ppc
is impressive. MUIppc(3.9) is really great with
On 29 Dec 2002 15:29:06 -0500, Targhan wrote:
what's the best tool to track erroneous tasks with? MuForce? I would
prefer to give a more specific bug report than it don't werk. I
just can't see that as very helpful...
I recommend enforcer/cyberguard + mungwall + poolwatch for 68k setups.
Hello David
On 27/12/2002, you wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:37:26 +0100, Stephen Harris wrote:
No idea. Does it happen when you don't load any site ? Oh, and of
course no one is using that optimized MUI version from aminet right ?
should we be ?
No.
We woudn't all be so eager to
On 01/01/78, Brian Sharman wrote:
We woudn't all be so eager to try the patch if Mr. Stuntz released
MUI39.
I think Mr Stuntz lives at the top of a pole in the middle of a desert.
Regards
--
Don Cox
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hello Don
We woudn't all be so eager to try the patch if Mr. Stuntz released
MUI39.
I think Mr Stuntz lives at the top of a pole in the middle of a desert.
When I look at the MUI shipped with pegasos (and probably with AOne)
I doubt that ;-) Someone must have created this really great
Hello Robin
On 28/12/2002, you wrote:
Hello Don
We woudn't all be so eager to try the patch if Mr. Stuntz released
MUI39.
I think Mr Stuntz lives at the top of a pole in the middle of a desert.
When I look at the MUI shipped with pegasos (and probably with AOne)
I doubt that ;-)
Hello Don
On 28/12/2002, you wrote:
On 01/01/78, Brian Sharman wrote:
We woudn't all be so eager to try the patch if Mr. Stuntz released
MUI39.
I think Mr Stuntz lives at the top of a pole in the middle of a desert.
Keeping Holger Kruse company.
Regards
Brian
Hello David
On 26-Dic-02, you wrote:
On 26 Dec 2002 17:43:58 -0500, Targhan wrote:
!#$@!!#$#@ It just crashed again. There is a leak in there
somewhere... I wonder just how big of a stack it'll need?
I don't think changing the stack would help V. It sets the stack by itself
on
On 27/12/02, David Gerber wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 01:58:03 +0100, Jocke =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6blom?=
wrote:
I had the crash on exit bug when using 52000 as stack. I changed it
to 50 and now I don't anymore. Please explain that :)
No idea. Does it happen when you don't load any
On 27/12/02, Franco Coccini wrote:
Increasing stack to 20 , make V 68K useable ON REAL AMIGA.
On emulated ones, not. IMHO
Ciao
PS-now with the stack increased, all the site that crash before, now
works perfectely.
Only Amiga.org, produce a yellow allert and then reboot. (see
On 27/12/02, David Gerber wrote:
On 26 Dec 2002 17:43:58 -0500, Targhan wrote:
!#$@!!#$#@ It just crashed again. There is a leak in there
somewhere... I wonder just how big of a stack it'll need?
I don't think changing the stack would help V. It sets the stack by
itself on startup if
In a message of 27-Dec-02 Don Cox wrote:
I tried it here on a 68k setup (cgx4, 060, OS 3.1) and it worked fine.
I have no idea why it's unstable for some people.
Try it on AOS 3.9. I don't think anyone is using 3.1 any more.
I'm, of course, still using OS 3.1. In my setup it is very
hello,
The good thing would be to test V on a bare OS9 (3.1/3.5 ?) + MUI
system.
I did that and V ran flawlessly ... Till I closed it ;) As it crashed
at this point.
I'm now washing the User-startup/Startup-S=E9quence.
But ... How sad a bare OS+MUI system ...
Raynald Le Moing.
On
On 27/12/02, Uffe Holst wrote:
In a message of 27-Dec-02 Don Cox wrote:
I tried it here on a 68k setup (cgx4, 060, OS 3.1) and it worked
fine.
I have no idea why it's unstable for some people.
Try it on AOS 3.9. I don't think anyone is using 3.1 any more.
I'm, of course, still
In a message of 27-Dec-02 Don Cox wrote:
Try it on AOS 3.9. I don't think anyone is using 3.1 any more.
I'm, of course, still using OS 3.1. In my setup it is very stable, and
even when running Voyager 3.3.122 I rarely experience any crashes.
I've have found no reasons to upgrade my
Hi David,
Which optimized MUI is it, one should not use?
Are we talking about the 020 patch for muimaster library?
Allan
On 27-Dec-02, David Gerber wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 01:58:03 +0100, Jocke =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6blom?= wrote:
I had the crash on exit bug when using 52000 as stack.
Hello David,
On 27-Dec-02, you wrote:
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 01:58:03 +0100, Jocke =?iso-8859-1?Q?Sj=F6blom?= wrote:
I had the crash on exit bug when using 52000 as stack. I changed it to
50 and now I don't anymore. Please explain that :)
No idea. Does it happen when you don't load any
Hello Allan
On 27-Dez-02, you wrote:
Hi David,
Which optimized MUI is it, one should not use?
Are we talking about the 020 patch for muimaster library?
DONT use this patch ... it's not improving anything.
But some progs start having problems with it ...
Just use the plain muimaster lib
Hi,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford said:
Did any of the libraries actually change, mcc's, or anything like
that, or just the exe for V? I've noticed when running the new V,
that other applications seem to go whacko too. (example: md2 1.4.16
and X-Arc)
Being un untrusting so-and-so for
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 17:37:26 +0100, Stephen Harris wrote:
No idea. Does it happen when you don't load any site ?
Oh, and of course no one is using that optimized MUI version from aminet
right ?
should we be ?
No.
--
David Gerber
VaporWare programmer
http://www.vapor.com/
finger [EMAIL
On 27 Dec 2002 19:01:12 +, Ian Greenway wrote:
Being un untrusting so-and-so for installer scripts, I checked the
versions of the files supplied. I don't know if it's related to the
problems seen, but several of the MUI classes supplied were *ancient*
compared to what I already had.
Hello David
On 27/12/2002, you wrote:
On 27 Dec 2002 19:01:12 +, Ian Greenway wrote:
Being un untrusting so-and-so for installer scripts, I checked the
versions of the files supplied. I don't know if it's related to the
problems seen, but several of the MUI classes supplied were
On Fri, 27 Dec 2002 21:17:55 +, Brian Sharman wrote:
Which ones?
The more recent ones I have are :- Speedbar.mcc. 14.4 03.06.02
Speedbar.mcp. =
14.4 03.06.02
Hello David
On 27-déc-02, David Gerber said about [voyager] Re: 3.3.125 :
On 26 Dec 2002 17:43:58 -0500, Targhan wrote:
!#$@!!#$#@ It just crashed again. There is a leak in there
somewhere... I wonder just how big of a stack it'll need?
I don't think changing the stack would help V
Hello Chapron-JeanMichel
On 27-Dic-02, you wrote:
here with cgx4 15 bits, 060, OS 3.9 and 8 I can't start. With 30 It
works for a few minutes!
new fixed version 3.3.126 available on v3.vapor.com
Ciao
PS-works fine on amiga.org also
@@
Oh dear, I opened my big mouth waaay too soon here. ;)
Now seems to be much more unstable than before. Running with
MuForce/MuGuardianAngel produces plenty of hits and broken
mungwalls (all seemingly single byte overruns).
Switching back to .122 :(
Duncan.
(68k version, P96 (Prometheus),
Hello Duncan
On 26-Dic-02, you wrote:
Oh dear, I opened my big mouth waaay too soon here. ;)
Now seems to be much more unstable than before. Running with
MuForce/MuGuardianAngel produces plenty of hits and broken
mungwalls (all seemingly single byte overruns).
Switching back to .122
Hello Franco
On 26/12/2002, you wrote:
Hello Duncan
On 26-Dic-02, you wrote:
Oh dear, I opened my big mouth waaay too soon here. ;)
Now seems to be much more unstable than before. Running with
MuForce/MuGuardianAngel produces plenty of hits and broken
mungwalls (all seemingly
With 20 of stack, V works quite perfectely! very, very fst!
Have increased stack to 20.
So far everything is now very sweet and very fast.
Not so here. Still get lock ups. Particularly on Amiga.org right
after trying to login.
--
--
Regards,
Dave 'Targhan' Crawford
Hi everybody,
I beleive Franco is right, it does seem to be reasonably stable with a stack increase!
Even if it doesnt, I've been testing the new vimgdec.vlib with v.122, and that seems
to work fine too. Without stack increase... I think!
Allan
On 26-Dec-02, Franco Coccini wrote:
Hello
Hello Michael
On 26-Dic-02, you wrote:
hi.
go to http://www.grasshopperllc.com/
you'll see scrollbars around all frames... that never happened before.
the source code tells not to draw them but voyager does. strange.
byebye...
yes, that is a bug (with a lot of sites)
But now with
35 matches
Mail list logo
