[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-14 Thread Jörgen Danielsson
Hello Matt, On 2004-07-14, you wrote: Was that technical enough for you? Yes. Thanks a lot for the explanation. It was intresting reading. Really, we have all of the serious bugs DOWN. They're all tested and verified and waiting to be fixed. We just don't have time. As for stuff that

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-14 Thread Gunnar von Boehn
Hi Matt, thanks for the very interesting explanation. :-) Is there a list of reported/known bugs? I would be nice if we could see which bugs are already on the todo list so we don't send them again. For example: I assume the problem, that V does not always honors nbsp;, is already known,

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Matt Sealey
Catch up? IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript mainly). AWeb?! You HAVE to be kidding me. AWeb hasn't changed for 2 years. All they did

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Robin
Hello [EMAIL PROTECTED] But i thought that the development of voyager,stopped.Am i wrong on this? Stopped ? Slowed down is the better word ;) Extremely slow ... And if i am,will it be able to catch up the IB and AW browsers ? Well, I consider it light years ahead of the two ... but thats

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Jörgen Danielsson
Hello Matt, On 2004-07-13, you wrote: Catch up? IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript mainly). The flash plugin for Voyager is close

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Matt Sealey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jörgen Danielsson Sent: 13 July 2004 15:44 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [voyager] Re: Voyager development ? Hello Matt, On 2004-07-13, you wrote: Catch up? IBrowse implements the same

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Jörgen Danielsson
Hello Matt, On 2004-07-13, you wrote: Catch up? IBrowse implements the same featureset, almost identical, but with some things Voyager does better (still.. count the flash plugins for IBrowse..) and some things IBrowse does better (Javascript mainly). The flash plugin for Voyager is

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Targhan
Bah, there's no reason to rag on each other like this. I've used sites that I literately had to use each of the three browsers to do different functions on the site. Had to use Ibrowse to make a login, had to use Voyager to upload files, then had to use AWeb to use the site's file manager. As

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Matt Sealey
-Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jörgen Danielsson Sent: 13 July 2004 18:03 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [voyager] Re: Voyager development ? We had tabs, we removed it because it was unstable, because users requested

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Gunnar von Boehn
Hi, First of all Voyager is nice. Anyway why should be fair and honor where other browser are better. Useless. They have native GIF, JPEG and PNG decoders anyway which are much faster. What's the point of datatypes than to work around the fact that IBrowse isn't PowerPC native yet? Ibrowse

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Gunnar von Boehn
Hello everyone, Hello Matt, I just read Matt's last email. Matt, I think you are taking this way to personally. I just wanted to say, if I would have read you last email earlier then I would have not written my comments. For your info: I'm working for MySQL for a living. Well, I personally

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Matt Sealey
PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Gunnar von Boehn Sent: 13 July 2004 19:14 To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [voyager] Re: Voyager development ? Hello everyone, Hello Matt, I just read Matt's last email. Matt, I think you are taking this way to personally. I just wanted to say

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Gunnar von Boehn
Hi Matt, Thanks for your answer. Sure, MySQL is a great product! But sometimes some people need Oracle. That's a fact of life. Thats right. MySQL is still a good product even if it misses some features of Oracle. But the same is true for Voyager. Voyager is still a good browser even if other

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Jörgen Danielsson
Hello Matt, On 2004-07-13, you wrote: No you had buttons with similar functionality. Sorry but I like the look of tabs. Speaking of support, there are more things included with support than removing a buggy function. Tabs (MUI register objects) are inefficient. When you create them, they

[voyager] Re: Voyager development ?

2004-07-13 Thread Jörgen Danielsson
Hello Targhan, On 2004-07-13, you wrote: Bah, there's no reason to rag on each other like this. I've used sites that I literately had to use each of the three browsers to do different functions on the site. Had to use Ibrowse to make a login, had to use Voyager to upload files, then had to

[voyager] Re: Voyager Development

2002-01-13 Thread Steve Willmott
Hello Matt, Although I have had Voyager for some time, I am new to the mailing list. I did not realise raising comments or suggesting improvements would be such a touchy subject. I hope you all keep up the good work and I will wait patiently for the results. Apologies Steve

[voyager] Re: Voyager Development

2002-01-12 Thread Matt Sealey
Thanks for the replies about Voyager's AREXX and keyboard interface. May I now ask an open question? Are there any plans to: 1. extend Voyager's AREXX interface eg to include a command to save an image? 2. restore the keyboard short-cuts? Impatient little fellow, aren't we? The ARexx

[voyager] Re: Voyager Development

2002-01-12 Thread Dennis Robb
Hello Matt MS Of course, now that you ask, we will endeavour not to fix your problems. MS We did have plans but I just threw them in the trash. Ever helpful:-) Regards Dennis _ Voyager Mailing List - http://v3.vapor.com/

[voyager] Re: Voyager Development

2002-01-12 Thread Matt Sealey
Of course, now that you ask, we will endeavour not to fix your problems. We did have plans but I just threw them in the trash. Ever helpful:-) My point, if you had any grasp of humour at all, is that you don't EVER need to ask do you have plans to fix this? Of course we have plans.

[voyager] Re: voyager development status

2001-12-04 Thread Gil Knutson
On 02-Dec-01,* Matt*, of Planet Eros, wrote these Wise Words: Nobody commits to any dates since commitments can always be broken. Too true... on all platforms... BUT, I fear that is just the way of the world when it comes to programming. The fixes you mention below, take 100 times to perfect

[voyager] Re: voyager development status

2001-12-02 Thread Jools Smyth
Hello Jools On 02-Dec-01, Jools Smyth wrote: Hello, yes i mean copy ofcourse not cut and paste.. before matt tries to reply thinking hes clever. Regards buzz -- sbExoticA - http://exotica.fix.no _ Voyager Mailing

[voyager] Re: voyager development status

2001-12-02 Thread Matt
Hello Jools On 02-Dec-01, you wrote: Hello, in the last weeks/months voyager development seems to be slowing down. Not really :) im just curious, is there any kind of time scale when the major missing features will be added.. although voyager could be a very good browser, in its