Hi Neale,
Below is the trace.
Thanks!
Michael.
00:05:18:275995: dpdk-input
GigabitEthernet0/4/0 rx queue 0
buffer 0x446a: current data 14, length 68, free-list 0, clone-count 0,
totlen-nifb 0, trace 0x1
PKT MBUF: port 0, nb_segs 1, pkt_len 82
buf_len 2176, data_len 82, ol_flags
OK, Thanks!
I added Damjan to review.
--Tom
On 10/10/2017 05:17 PM, Florin Coras wrote:
Hi Tom,
As long as the patches have a jira ticket, procedurally all is fine
with me. However, since we’re so close to release, I’d like Damjan,
since he’s the build infra manager, to vet the changes.
Hi Tom,
As long as the patches have a jira ticket, procedurally all is fine with me.
However, since we’re so close to release, I’d like Damjan, since he’s the build
infra manager, to vet the changes.
Regards,
Florin
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Thomas F Herbert
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:41 PM, John Lo (loj) wrote:
> The two APIs affected are the older ones in L2FIB which use “u64 mac”
> instead of “u8 mac[6]” to pass MAC addresses:
>
> ·L2fib_add_del
>
> ·L2_fib_table_details
>
>
>
> I believe it is a good change to
+1 Sounds good to me
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of John Lo (loj)
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 15:42
To: Jerome Tollet (jtollet) ; Mohsin Kazmi (sykazmi)
; vpp-dev
Subject: Re:
On 10/10/2017 10:46 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
I submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8736
Subunit is a prerequisite for
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 18:12, Justin Iurman wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was just wondering how I could build my own plugin without rebuilding
> everything from scratch in vpp ? I mean, here are two ways I found to build a
> plugin:
> - First technique (long, rebuilds
Hi folks,
I was just wondering how I could build my own plugin without rebuilding
everything from scratch in vpp ? I mean, here are two ways I found to build a
plugin:
- First technique (long, rebuilds everything):
https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/sample_plugin_doc.html
- Second technique (fast,
Thanks a ton Jeff.
I merged 8717, 8718 and proposed a different fix to 8716
(https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8729/).
I also noticed netlink plugin does not compile on 1710 and master due to a
change in VPP (Mostly renaming which happened here
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8366/2).
I have a patch
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
I submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8736/
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 14:03 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera -
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 14:03 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> this issue
Hi Michael,
Both of;
vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via GigabitEthernet0/4/0 Accept
vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via local Forward
the first says you are accepting (i.e RPF checks on) GigE0/4/0 the second says
you are ‘forwarding/replicating’ to VPP’s local IP stack.
The mfib equivalent of
Yep,
Yeah it is a work in progress for sub-interface support + the corresponding
unit tests... is that the use case you have in mind ?
--a
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 08:45, khers wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As far as I checked in vpp 17.07 branch version, It seems that the
> vlan
Hi Marco,
this issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing
is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install
check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile?
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:00:00)
> Hi all,
>
> As
Hi all,
As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my distribution
(openSUSE).
When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't anymore:
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/ext'
cc -o /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/vapi_test/vapi_c_test
Hello,
I want to add a new tokenizer in_port in mask field while creating classify
table.I dont want to make it part of l2 , l3 or l4 mask. The mask size will
get increased. Will it affect the performance ?? Is there any limit on the
mask size ??
Regards,
Avinash
Hi Michael,
Could you give me a ‘sh trace’ ?
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich
Date: Monday, 9 October 2017 at 18:14
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello
Thanks a ton Jeff.
I merged 8717, 8718 and proposed a different fix to 8716
(https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8729/).
I also noticed netlink plugin does not compile on 1710 and master due to a
change in VPP (Mostly renaming which happened here
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8366/2).
I have a patch
Hi,
As far as I checked in vpp 17.07 branch version, It seems that the
vlan tagged(dot1q) packets don't pass through ACL nodes for applying
packet filtering rules. Is it a plan for adding vlan tagged packet
processing in ACL Plugin?
Thanks
Cheers
Edward
19 matches
Mail list logo