I'm not sure who this should go to, nor the impact, so I'm posting it here.
vpp-merge-master-centos7 is failing due to libmemif and [ -Wstringop-overflow=]
see [0].
[0]
https://logs.fd.io/production/vex-yul-rot-jenkins-1/vpp-merge-master-centos7/9496/console.log.gz
(
Hi Raj,
There are no explicit vcl apis that allow a udp listener to be switched to
connected mode. We might decide to do this at one point through a new bind api
(non-posix like) since we do support this for builtin applications.
However, you now have the option of connecting a bound
Yes. It fixes the issue.
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:28 PM Florin Coras wrote:
> Hi Chuan,
>
> Does this [1] fix the issue?
>
> Regards,
> Florin
>
> [1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27103
>
> On May 15, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Chuan Han via lists.fd.io <
> chuanhan=google@lists.fd.io> wrote:
>
>
Hi Chuan,
Does this [1] fix the issue?
Regards,
Florin
[1] https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/27103
> On May 15, 2020, at 4:24 PM, Chuan Han via lists.fd.io
> wrote:
>
> The following patch is very suspicious.
>
> * a58be82dd vlib: fix unix cli commands crash without session
>
> vppctl works
The following patch is very suspicious.
* a58be82dd vlib: fix unix cli commands crash without session
vppctl works fine at: * 0ef915398 (HEAD) ikev2: use u32 in unformat
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 4:07 PM Chuan Han via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Hi, vpp team,
>
> It seems vppctl is broken on the
Hi Andrew,
“
An API that is not touched during a "make test" can not be moved
beyond the "in-progress" status. Adding the unit test implies the
commitment from the API contributor to follow the option (5) above
even for "trivial endianness bugs".
“
Absolutely essential! More so, after a
Thanks! Florin,
OK, I understood that I need to change my application to use UDP socket and
then use vppcom_session_connect().
This is fine for the UDP client ( sender) .
But ,in UDP Server ( receiver) , I am not sure how to use the
vppcom_session_connect(). .
I am using vppcom_session_listen()
Hi, vpp team,
It seems vppctl is broken on the master head: 18a86c6e6 g2: fix the g2
build for Ubuntu 20.04
The broken functionality is vppctl single command mode: sudo vppctl
host# vppctl
srv-2-vpp# sh ver
vpp v20.09-rc0~15-g18a86c6e6 built by root on host at 2020-05-15T15:31:41
srv-2-vpp#
Hi Raj,
We removed udpc transport in vpp. I’ll push a patch that removes it from vcl as
well.
Calling connect on a udp connection will give you connected semantics now. Let
me know if that solves the issue for you.
Regards,
Florin
> On May 15, 2020, at 12:15 PM, Raj Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi,
On Thu, May 14, 2020 at 11:23 AM Jon Loeliger via lists.fd.io wrote:
> Did the ICMP mapping open more than was expected or intended here?
>
> I chased this down in the code a bit, but I'm not sure what the _intent_
> is supposed to be.
> When "address only" is true (ie, both ports are 0), then
I chimed in initially, because admittedly, I am usually the one breaking
the api, (with Vratko telling me to stop breaking CSIT ;/ ) and I learned a
lot in the process.
1. The thing we don't have today that would have caught these endian issues
are api tests.
a. Send in a create and verify all
Hi,
I am getting segmentation fault in VPP when using VCL VPPCOM_PROTO_UDP *C*
socket. This issue is observed with both UDP sender and UDP receiver
application.
However, both UDP sender and receiver works fine with VPPCOM_PROTO_UDP.
Here is the stack trace -
(gdb) bt
#0 0x in
Greetings LFN Technical Community,
We wanted to make sure that you had the new format and dates for the
upcoming LFN Developer & Testing Forum on your radar. The event was
originally planned for the first week of June but has now been scheduled
for June 22 - 25. Like the LFN Technical Meetings in
If I read you correctly, this bug went unnoticed, but has never seen an LTS
release. LTS might be the only release people are actually developing products
with. :)
I also sent some mail about brokenness in the auto-generated endian functions.
I noticed this while I was investigating a post
As Neale replied earlier, adding L3 addr to the interface should implicitly
enable arp on it.
Thanks!
--
Regards,
Balaji.
From: Mrityunjay Kumar
Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 7:19 AM
To: "Balaji Venkatraman (balajiv)"
Cc: Laurent Dumont , vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP
There's a very interesting couple of gerrit changes that just came in
today that is worth discussing,
and they are a perfect case study to further clarify the process - so
I tweaked the subject accordingly..
The API message itself is relatively minor, but regardless of what is
agreed that makes a
Hi Balaji
Its working for me. I was just trying to help "Laurent Dumont"
--
@Laurent Dumont , can try it, even this arp
issue, is it working for you if you are adding neghbor IP?
set ip neighbor set ip neighbor [del]
[static] [no-fib-entry] [count ] [fib-id
]
Hi Laurent,
ARP is enabled on an interface once it is assigned an IP address or is made
unnumbered to another. You can check that ARP is enabled with:
sh int feat VirtualFunctionEthernet0/5/0.101
and you won’t see ‘arp-disabled’ as a feature on the arp arc.
I suspect you are not receiving
Hi Mrityunjay,
Could you try adding an ip route and recheck.
I think ARP is enabled once ip routing is enabled.
Thanks
--
Regards,
Balaji.
From: on behalf of Laurent Dumont
Date: Friday, May 15, 2020 at 4:57 AM
To: Mrityunjay Kumar
Cc: vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] VPP - DPDK - No ARP
Hi everyone!
Thank you for the tips
The VF is created with the Trust On and spoofcheck disabled during the
instance creation.
vf 18 MAC fa:16:3e:92:30:f1, spoof checking off, link-state auto, trust on
I had a change to test this a bit more. It looks like the issue is
specifically with passing
Hi Neale,
Sorry about the trace.
The match in the SPD is against SA 20’s tunnel addresses not the policy’s
> local/remote range.
Thanks for clarifying this. I was confused here.
I created the SA and policy with this in mind and got it to work
successfully.
Thanks a lot for your help.
I will
21 matches
Mail list logo
