Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Stateful NAT64 crashes with segmentation fault

Hi Gabor, I will look into it and get back to you. Meanwhile could you run the same test with a debug build and post the results ? Maybe even core dump. Also please post your startup.conf file Best regards, Filip Varga st 9. 11. 2022 o 7:50 Gabor LENCSE napísal(a): > Dear VPP Developers, > >

[vpp-dev] VPP Stateful NAT64 crashes with segmentation fault

Dear VPP Developers, I am a researcher and I would like to benchmark the performance of the stateful NAT64 implementation of FD.io VPP. Unfortunately, VPP crashed with segmentation fault. Some details: I used two Dell PowerEdge R430 servers as the Tester and the DUT (Device Under Test),

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP ACL IPv6 with vppctl

Hi Jens, Thanks for the report ! There are two issues. First, if a parameter is omitted, it is implicitly initialized to 0.0.0.0/0 - as a shortcut for the debugging. So even the “working” case is not correct - you end up with ipv6 source and ipv4 destination, which may give you

[vpp-dev] VPP ACL IPv6 with vppctl

Dear VPP Dev Team, i found a problem with creating a VPP ACL with IPv6 SRC / DST Address. The ACL created incorrectly. The problem occurs when "any" ::/0 is used as the SRC address.  Example (correct) vpp# set acl-plugin acl permit src 2a00:c940::/32 ACL index:35 vpp# show acl-plugin acl

[vpp-dev] "tx frame not ready " error in host-vpp1out tx

Hi,Mohsin I used linux veth pari interface as af-packet interfeace in vpp. When the vpp run for some time, there are many "tx frame not ready " error in host-vpp1out-tx. If there is error, we can not ping from linux side to vpp side. Must need restart vpp to restore. From old mail. you

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues about RDMA native plugin

> > >>> Issue #1: VPP crashes when scales to multiple worker cores/threads. > [...] > >>> We guess VPP buffer metadata has been corrupted in the case of > >>> multiple worker threads using VPP release version > > >> BG: do you reproduce the issue on both x86 and ARM? Or only on ARM? > >> I’m

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues about RDMA native plugin

>>> Issue #1: VPP crashes when scales to multiple worker cores/threads. [...] >>> We guess VPP buffer metadata has been corrupted in the case of multiple >>> worker threads using VPP release version >> BG: do you reproduce the issue on both x86 and ARM? Or only on ARM? I’m >> especially thinking

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues about RDMA native plugin

From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 3:56 AM To: Jieqiang Wang Cc: Lijian Zhang ; Tianyu Li ; nd ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io; moham...@hawari.fr Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Issues about RDMA native plugin Hi Jieqiang, Thanks a lot

Re: [vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37579

Sorry about dup mails, something goes wrong with my email client. It's ok Now. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22146): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22146 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/94861307/21656 Group Owner:

Re: [vpp-dev] Issues about RDMA native plugin

Hi Jieqiang, Thanks a lot for your report! CC’ing vpp-dev because that may be of interest to others, and also you can get better support. My comments/questions inline prefixed with BG: in red Best ben From: Jieqiang Wang Sent: Monday, November 7, 2022 9:25 To: Benoit Ganne (bganne) ;

Re: [vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37579

Hi, That was already done. Please check your status. Best regards, Filip Varga po 7. 11. 2022 o 9:01 lihuawei napísal(a): > Hi everyone, > > I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37579. > > *gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37579 > * > >

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37585

Hi everyone, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37585. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37585 short description: fix crash when delete classify table used by interface. when classify table is used by interface, the classify table can be deleted without any check and hint. And

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37579

Hi everyone, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37579. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37579 short description: cli show policer's help info is not consistent with it's arguments. Please have a look and review. Best regards, Huawei LI -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37579

Hi everyone, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37579. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37579 short description: cli show policer's help info is not consistent with it's arguments. Please have a look and review. Best regards, Huawei LI

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37579

Hi everyone, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37579. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37579 short description: cli show policer's help info is not consistent with it's arguments. Please have a look and review. Best regards, Huawei LI

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37585

Hi everyone, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37585. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37585 short description: fix crash when delete classify table used by interface. when classify table is used by interface, the classify table can be

Re: [vpp-dev] MAP-E Configuration

Hallo Filip, Thanks in advance for your cooperation. Just a heads up. I have installed it again on ubuntu 22.04 (coz it has better support with VPP apparently). I have VPP version 22.10 here. I found VPP documentation regarding MAP-E and MAP-T: -

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Merged... This patch addresses similar issues with iOS devices which appear to pay attention to the router flag... Thanks... Dave From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Petr Boltík Sent: Sunday, November 6, 2022 4:09 AM To: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi Matt, Thank you. I can confirm that your fix works. Now I can continue to deploy ipv6 using kea dhcpv6 (without static configuration). Best regards Petr B. ne 6. 11. 2022 v 0:13 odesílatel Petr Boltík via lists.fd.io napsal: > Hi Matt, > > Than you so much. I will test it as soon as

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Gerrit Report Enhancement

Hi Andrew, Hmmm, the fix was to get_changes.py to not download changes with -2 (before classification / report generation), so it would appear to be a bug in the gerrit api.  What change was it? It worked for two of my changes which are set to -2 (33707 & 33727). BTW, if you prefer to

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi Matt, Than you so much. I will test it as soon as possible. Petr Dne so 5. 11. 2022 21:44 uživatel Matthew Smith via lists.fd.io napsal: > Hi Petr, > > You didn't miss any configuration. I don't see any place where the router > flag is set on an NA in current VPP master branch code. > >

Re: [vpp-dev] MAP-E Configuration

Hi Ameen, I will look into it and let you know. Best regards, Filip Varga so 5. 11. 2022 o 13:13 Ameen Al-Azzawi napísal(a): > Hello Filip, > > I saw your reply to one of the MAP-related topics. > > > I am trying to build the topology of MAP-E and MAP-T IPv6 transition > technology. > > I am

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi Petr, You didn't miss any configuration. I don't see any place where the router flag is set on an NA in current VPP master branch code. Can you test with https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37582 applied and see if it addresses the issue? -Matt On Fri, Nov 4, 2022 at 1:49 PM Petr Boltík

[vpp-dev] MAP-E Configuration

Hello Filip, I saw your reply to one of the MAP-related topics. I am trying to build the topology of MAP-E and MAP-T IPv6 transition technology. I am starting with MAP-E (IETF RFC- 7597). Please see attached pic of my Topology. I am trying to build “MAP-CE” and “MAP-BR” machines using VPP.

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Gerrit Report Enhancement

Hi Dave, Very cool! I assume this change reflects only for the changes showing in component maintainers’ lists, and not the authors ? (I saw one -2 change in my list in this report, which is the “correct” behavior imo, so just making sure it is a feature and not a bug :) --a > On 4 Nov 2022,

Re: [vpp-dev] maintainer's email

I cleaned up my Linux Foundation profile. Hopefully the problem won't recur. Thanks for the report... Dave Barach -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22129): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22129 Mute This Topic:

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi, Thanks for your reply. I did a packet capture using Wireshark to compare RA from the VPP/MikroTik/Radvd. There is no problem with routing advertisements from VPP, but with Neighbor Advertisement when RA is enabled. ICMP v6 flag is not set correctly - The Router flag is NOT set on the VPP

[vpp-dev] maintainer's email

Hi Dave Barach & everyone, Is maintainer Dave Barach’s email 'v...@barachs.net' right in file MAINTAINERS? When I add this email to —reviewers, something like "(Account 'v...@barachs.net' not found, v...@barachs.net does not identify a registered user or group)" will be generated. I found a

[vpp-dev] MAPE / MAPT configuration

Hello everyone, I am a newbie to VPP, I want to build MAPE / MAPT machines using VPP. I managed to get VPP installed and running on my Centos-7 VM. The question is where to start ? Is there any documentation on MAPE / MAPT configuration?? Any input is highly appreciated. Regards Ameen

[vpp-dev] VPP Gerrit Report Enhancement

Folks, I have enhanced the VPP Gerrit Report to not include gerrit changes which are marked 'Code-review -2'.  Today's report [0] reflects that improvement. Please let me know if you have any feedback on this report. Thanks, -daw- [0] https://github.com/vpp-dev/vpp-gerrit-report

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi Petr, Unfortunately I can't confirm the issue, but I do not think it is a very commonly tested scenario so it is not really surprising... What could help understand the issue would be if you could capture the RA traffic in both scenarios (VPP vs radvd) so we can compare. Best ben >

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi all, Can someone please confirm this VPP IP6 RA issue? Any idea is welcome. I already tested the latest VPP build v23.02-rc0~96-ge69d97438~b598 with no success. Installed default IP6 GW on Windows7/10/UBNTairOS disappeared after a short time. Thanks Best regards Petr B. pá 28. 10. 2022 v

Re: [vpp-dev] #VPP dev #vpp

I am using  DPDK 20.11 code base for VPP. any help is appreciated -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22121): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22121 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/94801792/21656 Mute

[vpp-dev] #VPP dev

Hi Team , I have recently started with VPP. I am facing below error while trying to add ip address to the interface Logs : 2022/11/04 11:47:55:257 notice dpdk EAL: Probe PCI driver: net_qdma (10ee:903f) device: :af:00.0 (socket 1) 2022/11/04 11:47:55:257 notice dpdk

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi Anthony, Great! Will add the gethostbyname issue to my never shrinking todo list but, should you look into it, let me know if you manage to figure out how ldp interacts with gethostbyname. Regards, Florin > On Nov 3, 2022, at 4:54 AM, Anthony Fee wrote: > > Hi Florin, > > Thanks for

Re: [vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Thanks, merged! Regards, Florin > On Nov 3, 2022, at 12:33 AM, 张东亚 wrote: > > Hi, > > I have made a patch and submit it to gerrit for review. > > https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37567 > > I have run against vpp unit test for session feature and no

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi Florin, Thanks for the feedback. I built a very basic application to trigger a TCP request, with gethostbyname() to resolve the hostname, using the VCL library directly. This worked as expected. Just to verify, I ran this also with LD_PRELOAD and I did see the gethostbyname() function

[vpp-dev] Policer classify as an output feature

Hi VPP folks, Less than 2 years ago, a new feature named `input policing` was added to VPP and 7 months ago the output counterpart was added which enables a policer on all the incoming/outgoing traffic on an interface. Here is a similar patch to add class-based policing as an output feature:

Re: [vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Hi, I have made a patch and submit it to gerrit for review. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37567 I have run against vpp unit test for session feature and no regression found yet. Florin Coras 于2022年11月1日周二 23:42写道： > Hi, > > Will you be pushing the fix or should I do it? > > Regards, >

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp vlan

Hi,Pim I use vpp to receive various packets and send them to different interface by rules. Vpp will drop vlan packet because cannot find vlan table, sometimes we not need vlan label. When vpp install in LAN，for example company，our ip is different so we can strip vlan lable another method is in

Re: [vpp-dev] vpp vlan

Hoi, While I'll leave other folks to comment on why the feature was removed (although https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/34822 does give a good explanation), I'm curious to know why you need this function. Can you describe what you're trying to accomplish with VPP? Perhaps there is a

[vpp-dev] vpp vlan

Hi,vpp experts I found that vpp remove dpdk config vlan-strip-offload in 2021 Nov 12 ,can you explain why you remove it? thanks I need this function,so if i can recover this code in vpp-2206 version ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online

[vpp-dev] RFC for generic flow in native avf

Hi, I submitted a patch for supporting generic flow in native avf. https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37563 Generic flow related features were discussed and accepted in the past two releases, for example, generic flow in dpdk plugins and packetforge. This time we are willing to enable it in

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, Thanks for your suggestion, I will take into account all these. Best regards, Huawei LI > 2022年11月1日 01:26，filvarga 写道： > > Hi Li, > > I would suggest looking into session logic implementation of NAT44-ED and > also into ACLs in VPP. The way to go would be to create a plugin that

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, I would suggest looking into session logic implementation of NAT44-ED and also into ACLs in VPP. The way to go would be to create a plugin that has late limiting nodes. Now you have two options on how to rate limit: 1) based on interface(s) - the more straightforward and easy to implement

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi Anthony, Assuming the host os has network connectivity beyond vpp for dns resolution, this is surprising. Would be good to understand if anything actually makes its way into ldp during a gethostbyname() call. Native integration with vcl, as opposed to ldp, should solve the problem but

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip & community, About the rate limiting with NAT session, does anyone have recommended reference? Best regards, Huawei LI > 2022年10月29日 04:14，filvarga 写道： > > Hi, Li > > There is no such goal. It would’t be good idea to put rate limiting directly > into NAT. For many good reasons. >

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, Glad to help. Best regards, Filip On Mon, 31 Oct 2022 at 16:52, lihuawei wrote: > Hi Filip, > > I have tried to use extra vrf for routing the nat packets in my nat > traffic scenario, it worked good, just caused a little bit of a problem > and could be circumvented. I also tried the

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, I have tried to use extra vrf for routing the nat packets in my nat traffic scenario, it worked good, just caused a little bit of a problem and could be circumvented. I also tried the other way to add network prefix member in struct snat_address_t, it worked well too, and this method

[vpp-dev] confusion about bvi && bridge-domain && l2fib

Hi community, I tested and studied the bvi && bridge-domain && l2fib recently, and have a confusion about them. When config "set interface l2 bridge loop1 1 bvi", only one bvi interface can be set in a bridge doamin, checked and used at l2 flood process. When config "l2fib add

Re: [vpp-dev] Are some VPP releases considered LTS releases?

Hi Elias, No, there is no VPP LTS releases. However, VPP FD.io infra retains the config to have Jenkins jobs for CI for the current and the previous release, on a rolling basis - and the fixes may be cherry-picked there by the community members wishing to do so. --a > On 31 Oct 2022, at

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi Florin, Thank you for the reply, much appreciated. I assume that gethostbyname() uses something under the hood that LDP does intercept, otherwise it would continue to use the Linux implementation to resolve hostnames. From what I can see, right now LDP renders gethostbyname() unusable in

Re: [vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37559

On it. Best regards, Filip Varga po 31. 10. 2022 o 14:13 lihuawei napísal(a): > Hi community, > > I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37559. > > *gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37559 > * > > *short description: *Fix byte order error about

[vpp-dev] Gerrit Review Id 37559

Hi community, I have added a fix as gerrit review id 37559. gerrit link: https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37559 short description: Fix byte order error about the struct snat_address_t's member net. For example configurations: set interface ip table loop1

[vpp-dev] gerrit GPG account issue

Hi guys, I was trying to set up a GPG signature for signing my commits. I followed github guides [0] [1] that I used previously for setting up my github account with GPG signing. I face an issue when I try to add my exported public key into the New GPG key gerrit field. Basically what happens is

[vpp-dev] Are some VPP releases considered LTS releases?

Hello VPP experts, Are some VPP releases considered LTS (long-term support) releases? If so, which is the latest LTS version at this time? Best regards, Elias -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22097):

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi Najieb, I already know this issue, but it is a different issue from my RA you probably mean the situation, when VPP dhcp4 client does not reflect the received default route to the control plane using linuxNL. This can be easily solved by running dpcpcd (Debian apt install dhcpcd5)

Re: [vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

I have the same problem but on ipv4 where the default route on linuxCP/NL is not read / lost from vpp, vpp only reads direct routes. but when I add a static route from vppctl everything is back to normal. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi, Li There is no such goal. It would’t be good idea to put rate limiting directly into NAT. For many good reasons. Much better solution would be to implement a new rate limiting plugin. If you need such a functionality feel free to contribute. Best regards On Fri, 28 Oct 2022 at 18:35,

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi Anthony, LDP doesn’t currently intercept gethostbyname as integration with vpp's internal dns resolver is not yet done for vcl. Should you or anybody else be interested in implementing that, I’d be happy to offer support. Regards, Florin > On Oct 28, 2022, at 2:29 AM, Anthony Fee wrote:

[vpp-dev] Bug report - IP6 ND RA default route disappear from host device

Hi all, I have discovered the problem with IP6 ND RA receiving side - it can be observed on Windows 10/7/UBNT airos8 and some others. Issue not observed on the Debian 11+nmcli. Configuration is pretty straightforward. Tested with VPP 22.06, 22.10. Issue persists. VPP configuration is the default,

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, Yes, it’s "session rate limiting" what I mean. Does community have any plan about "session rate limiting" in the classical flavours of nat? Thanks & Regards, Huawei LI > 2022年10月28日 21:20，filvarga 写道： > > Hi Li, > > What exactly do you mean by "new nat session rate limit" ?

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, What exactly do you mean by "new nat session rate limit" ? There is no session rate limiting in the classical flavours of nat (nat44-ed,nat44-ei,det44,nat64,nat66) Best regards, Filip Varga pi 28. 10. 2022 o 3:09 lihuawei napísal(a): > Hi Filip, > > Thanks very much for your detailed

Re: [vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi all, I still haven't had any luck getting this working. Any ideas? Thanks in advance! Anthony -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22089): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22089 Mute This Topic:

[vpp-dev] assertion for going before the headroom

Hello folks, I've updated to 22.10 and an assertion failed. Looks like I went more than 8 bytes before the headroom (although the packet looks fine). Since it's quite hard to tell who's the bad guy, shouldn't we have the following assertion in vlib_buffer_advance also? ASSERT ((signed)

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, Thanks very much for your detailed instructions and configuration examples. I will try this method later on. Another question about nat, is there any support for new nat session rate limit in vpp? Thanks & Regards, Huawei LI > 2022年10月28日 01:22，filvarga 写道： > > Hi Li, > >

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, NAT44-ED doesn't support ACL. There are other NAT plugins in VPP. For example PNAT uses ACL rules. You should go through all of the options there are and pick the correct NAT flavor that will suffice. Well your option is to do following: 1) # lan1 interface belongs to vrf1 # lan2

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, I have searched your mail accounts, and didn’t find any acl configuration used with nat44. Do you mean use acl with nat44 address to achive to my target creating nat sessions based packet’s source ip's network? How about multi nat addresses respectively used for multi-subnets in a

Re: [vpp-dev] FDIO Maintenance: 2022-11-30 16:00 UTC to 01:00 UTC

To avoid delaying CSIT reports, we are moving this maintenance to Nov 30th Thank you, Vanessa On 10/24/22 12:19 PM, Vanessa Valderrama wrote: *What*: * Jenkins o Jenkins sandbox and production o OS and security updates o Jenkins upgrade o Plugin upgrades *

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, Yes, try to search one of my mail accounts (current/previous) for example fiva...@cisco.com, filipvarg...@gmail.com or my name. If you are looking for a feature that does ACL matching based on source address you should try to look in different implementations of nat44, there are more then

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Filip, Sorry, I didn’t state the demands clearly. My demand is to let a nat ip address just only work for specific src network prefix in a vpc, the nat sessions using the nat ip address will be created only when the i2o packets’s src ip matches the specific network prefix in the vpc. 1) I

[vpp-dev] vpp crash in plugin of crypto_native

hi I have one server that the cpu is AuthenticAMD，then when I config ipsec in vpp，the cli such as: ipsec sa add 10 spi 1001 esp crypto-alg aes-cbc-128 crypto-key it will crash in crypto_native_plugin.so，the function is aes128_key_expand, when I get the variable's value with u8x16u

[vpp-dev] vpp crash in plugin of crypto_native

hi I have one server that the cpu is AuthenticAMD，then when I config ipsec in vpp，the cli such as: ipsec sa add 10 spi 1001 esp crypto-alg aes-cbc-128 crypto-key it will crash in crypto_native_plugin.so，the function is aes128_key_expand, when I get the variable's value with u8x16u

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi Li, There are few errors in your statement. 1) SNAT - is an obsolete name for the old nat plugin. 2) NAT is split among multiple plugins 3) one of the plugins - nat44-ed (the most used and preferred) does support all of the things you have mentioned Please feel free to search in the

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP release 22.10 is complete !

Most Excellent! Congratulations to the VPP Community for another high quality, on time, release. Thanks to Andrew for his work driving the release process to a successful conclusion. -daw- On 10/26/22 14:04, Andrew Yourtchenko wrote: Hi all, VPP release 22.10 is complete ! You can have

Re: [vpp-dev] Ip6 router advertisement API configuration

Hi, success ... first part solution - request must be splittet into two requests: 1. send api msg to configure > ip6_nd.SwInterfaceIP6ndRaConfig{ >SwIfIndex: 2, >Other: 1, >Managed: 1, >MaxInterval: 20, >MinInterval: 5, >DefaultRouter: 1, >Lifetime: 180, > } > > 2.

[vpp-dev] VPP release 22.10 is complete !

Hi all, VPP release 22.10 is complete ! You can have a look at the release notes at https://docs.fd.io/vpp/22.10/aboutvpp/releasenotes/v22.10.html The artifacts are available at the https://packagecloud.io/fdio/release Thanks to Dave Wallace and Vanessa Valderrama for the assistance in

[vpp-dev] Ip6 router advertisement API configuration

Hi all, I'm trying to configure the VPP Ip6 router advertisement using api (govpp) for a few days with no success. I can successfully configure RA with cli. `vppctl ip6 nd enp3s0 ra-managed-config-flag ra-other-config-flag ra-interval 60 20 ra-lifetime 180 vppctl ip6 nd enp3s0 no ra-suppress` I

FW: [vpp-dev] FDIO Maintenance: 2022-11-02 16:00 UTC to 01:00 UTC

Hi As we start the release testing on 27th of October, is it possible to postpone the FDIO Maintenance to at least 16th of November, please? Thank you Tibor From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> On Behalf Of Vanessa Valderrama Sent: Monday,

[vpp-dev] DNS Resolution over VCL

Hi all, I have a question regarding DNS lookup from an application using VCL. I'm working with an application that resolves hostnames to IP addresses using the gethostbyname() function. The applications interfaces to the Linux network stack using the epoll API and so seemed like a good

[vpp-dev] Add Variable- Length Option GENEVE

Hello, what would be the best way to add a Variable-Length Option to a GENEVE tunnel? Is there any API or something that allows me to do so? Thanks in advance, Stephan -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22072):

Re: [vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Hi, Apologies, I missed your original point and only though about the large bitmap we create at startup. So yes, go for s->session_index + 1. Regards, Florin > On Oct 24, 2022, at 9:11 PM, Zhang Dongya wrote: > > Hi, > > Can you elaborate a bit on that, If session index is 64, if we do not

Re: [vpp-dev] FDIO Maintenance: 2022-11-02 16:00 UTC to 01:00 UTC

Hi As we start the release testing on 27th of October, is it possible to postpone the FDIO Maintenance to at least 16th of November, please? Thank you Tibor From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Vanessa Valderrama Sent: Monday, October 24, 2022 7:19 PM To: disc...@lists.fd.io;

Re: [vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Hi, Can you elaborate a bit on that, If session index is 64, if we do not increase by 1, it will only make one 64B vec for the bitmap, which may not hold the session index. Florin Coras 于2022年10月25日周二 01:14写道： > Hi, > > Could you replace s->session_index by s->session_index ? : 1 in the patch?

[vpp-dev] FD.io VPP (master branch) Gerrit Change Report is now being generated daily

Folks, I have completed automating the generation of the VPP Gerrit Change Report which will now be updated daily. The source code and latest report can be found in the repo: https://github.com/vpp-dev/vpp-gerrit-report The daily report can be found in the file, VPP-GERRIT-REPORT.rst and its

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-dev No packets generated from Vhost user interface

Use “virsh dumpxml” to check the output to see if you have memAccess=share as below Steven From: on behalf of suresh vuppala Reply-To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Date: Friday, October 21, 2022 at 5:23 PM To: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io" Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-dev No packets generated from

[vpp-dev] FDIO Maintenance: 2022-11-02 16:00 UTC to 01:00 UTC

*What*: * Jenkins o Jenkins sandbox and production o OS and security updates o Jenkins upgrade o Plugin upgrades * Gerrit o OS and security updates *     JIRA o OS and security updates o JIRA upgrade o JIRA migration *     Ingress o OS and

Re: [vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Hi, Could you replace s->session_index by s->session_index ? : 1 in the patch? Regards, Florin > On Oct 24, 2022, at 12:23 AM, Zhang Dongya wrote: > > Hi list, > > Recently I am testing my TCP application in a plugin, what I did is to > initiate a TCP client in my plugin, however, when I

[vpp-dev] weird crash when allocate new ho_session_alloc in debug image

Hi list, Recently I am testing my TCP application in a plugin, what I did is to initiate a TCP client in my plugin, however, when I build the debug image and test, the vpp will crash and complaint about out of memory. After doing some research, it seems the following code may cause the crash:

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-dev No packets generated from Vhost user interface

Hi Steven, Thanks for responding on the request. I am using openstack to launch a VM here. SO you mean during VM launch I have to specify hugepage size ? Thanks, Suresh -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22063):

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-dev No packets generated from Vhost user interface

Your Qemu command to launch the VM is likely missing the hugepage or share option. -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22062): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22062 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/94432596/21656 Mute

Re: [vpp-dev] snat support bind to specific subnets

Hi John & Everyone & Community, In my scene, it is the demand to put multiple subnets in one BD. A few days ago, I have found the other proper idea to implement the demand mentioned in the mail subject and original mail. This problem and mail can be close now. Have a nice day, everybody!

Re: [vpp-dev] Wireguard with Linux Control Plane

Matt, It was indeed that simple! I've been trying to figure this out for two days and somehow missed that one little detail. My wireguard interface is up and FRR is talking OSPF over it now! Thanks! -Landy On Thu, Oct 20, 2022 at 3:05 PM Matthew Smith via lists.fd.io wrote: > > Hi Landy, > >

Re: [vpp-dev] Wireguard with Linux Control Plane

Hi Landy, The packet you're receiving is probably not encrypted. You can see that it was successfully decrypted after wg4-input because the trace shows the inside addresses (192.168.42.7 -> 192.168.42.6). None of the nodes after that point would have encrypted it again. The likely explanation is

Re: [vpp-dev] Wireguard with Linux Control Plane

I captured a trace of an incoming ping packet, and I have included it below. This is a ping from 192.168.42.7 (remote wireguard peer, tunnel address) to 192.168.42.6 ( local vpp host, tunnel address ) It appears everything is good all the way through the punt stage, but for some reason the

Re: [vpp-dev] Throughput of VPP on KVM is Significantly Worse than Linux Kernel

VPP performs best when packets are batched together. You should observe performance improvement with iperf multiflow test if there are no other bottlenecks in your setup. Best Regards, Mohsin From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io on behalf of Xiaodong Xu Date: Thursday, October 20, 2022 at 4:30 AM To:

[vpp-dev] VPP 22.10 release notes ready

Hi all, https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37482 Feel free to push the updates in case you have any edits. As a reminder - the release will commence at 12:00 UTC on Wednesday 26 October (in just less than a week). --a /* your friendly 22.10 release manager */ -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

Re: [vpp-dev] #vpp-dev No packets generated from Vhost user interface

HI VPP-dev team, Can you please help here and let me know if anything is missing in config Thanks, Suresh -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#22055): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/22055 Mute This Topic:

[vpp-dev] L4 checksum error in forwarded ICMP (type 3 code 4)

Hello list, I have VPP running as my home gateway, and found PMTUD broken. Did some captures and discovered that ICMP type 3 code 4 packets, generated by ISP router and forwarded by VPP, has a bad ICMP checksum. The packet, as it enters VPP, is correct; VPP then modifies the destination IP and

[vpp-dev] Wireguard with Linux Control Plane

Hey All, I'm having some trouble passing a wireguard connection into the kernel. I'm new to VPP, but my goal is to set up a series of FRR / VPP routers running OSPF, BGP, and wireguard to connect several datacenters and do internet peering for any anycast project. I am using VPP 22.06 on Ubuntu

<    2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   11   >