[vpp-dev] Bumping dpdk to 22.11 in vpp 23.02 ?

Hi, On CSIT call just now Kai made us aware of issues with above (cryptodev, sat), as captured in this patch: 37840: dpdk: make impact to VPP for changes in API for DPDK 22.11 | https://gerrit.fd.io/r/c/vpp/+/37840 23.02 RC1 is next week and in CSIT we start testing at RC1 milestone, so

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc-private] [csit-dev] TRex - replacing CVL with MLX for 100GbE

eeting/2022/fd_io_tsc/fdio-meeting-fd_io_tsc.2022-06-09-15.00.html On 5 Apr 2022, at 12:55, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: Super, thanks! On 4 Apr 2022, at 20:22, Dave Wallace mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hi Maciek, I have added this info

[vpp-dev] CSIT and VPP 22.02 known issues status check

Hi, We have been discussing and working through a number of known issues since VPP v22.02 and CSIT-2202 shipped. Entering v22.06 rc2, so I thought it’s good time to take an overall read of status, as jira is not always an accurate reflection. Below my compilation based on CSIT-2202 report and

[vpp-dev] New CSIT dashboard with VPP and DPDK performance data

Hi, Following from Tibor's demo of the new CSIT dashboard on the VPP call last Tuesday, here the links to what was presented. Note that the backend and frontend apps are still being tuned, so please treat this as an engineering preview. Glitches and disruption are likely to occur :) - Current

[vpp-dev] VPP call topic - csit.fd.io perf dashboard preview

Hi Damjan, For the VPP call today, if possible, could we get 10-15min for CSIT team to do a demo of the new csit.fd.io perf dashboard? Cheers, Maciek -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#21439):

[vpp-dev] CSIT topics for VPP meeting today

Hi, We would like to spend 5-10min doing the CSIT-2202 vpp rls notes review, specifically recorder failures and regressions. Vratko and me will lead that. If there is no time on the call agenda today, no sweat, we can do it on the next call. Cheers, Maciek -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You

[vpp-dev] topic proposal for today's vpp community call

Hi, If possible, in today’s meeting, we would like to cover highlights of vpp performance regressions and test failures based on v22.02 rc2 testing in CSIT. 5-10 min will suffice to cover the highlights. Vratko will be sending current summary in email to vpp-dev and csit-dev before the

Re: [vpp-dev] Thu 13-Jan FD.io CSIT talk at LFN Developer & Testing Forum

Here pointers to materials and recordings from the session last week - Enjoy: CSIT Talk: Performance Benchmarking, Anomaly Detection, Results Tracking

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Thu 13-Jan FD.io CSIT talk at LFN Developer & Testing Forum

Zoom link to the session per teamup link below: https://zoom.us/j/96267999834?pwd=UnBNM2NveXgyT3BpdkNSenV2VjJjQT09 We will post the materials on the event wiki link listed below and in fd.io wiki, will send links. > On 11 Jan 2022, at 15:58, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd

[vpp-dev] Thu 13-Jan FD.io CSIT talk at LFN Developer & Testing Forum

Dear All, Some of us from CSIT will be giving a talk at this week LFN Developer & Testing Forum (virtual event via Zoom, and it’s free to attend). Title: FD.io CSIT Performance Benchmarking, Anomaly Detection, Results Tracking. Time: Thursday 13th January 2021 13:00-14:00 GMT (London)

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

e once said "Energy and (constructive) persistence conquer all things”, especially when done with conviction of being right ;) Cheers, Maciek Regards Ameen On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 4:39 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: Dear Ameen, What s

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

paper on VPP and the system doesn't function. I have asked here a million times about configuring ds-lite, no one helped. On Thu, Nov 11, 2021 at 3:19 PM Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io<http://lists.fd.io/> mailto:cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote: Big thanks to FD.

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html [1] - https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/vpp_performance_tests/packet_throughput_graphs/ip4-2n-skx-x710.html On Thu, 11 Nov 2021 at 15:19, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io<http://lists.fd.io/>

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io CSIT-2110 Release Report is published

Big thanks to FD.io community contributors and supporters that enabled this data-rich publication. Great job everyone! Cheers, Maciek On 10 Nov 2021, at 18:12, Tibor Frank via lists.fd.io mailto:tifrank=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote: Hi All,

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT-2106 Release Report is published

iek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > wrote: > > Hi All, > > FD.io CSIT-2106 report is now available on FD.io docs site: > > https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/ > > Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and > VPP communities for

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT-2106 Release Report is published

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2106 report is now available on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2106/report/ Another successful release! Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and VPP communities for making it happen. See below for CSIT-2106 release summary and pointers to specific sections

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP: A Terabit Secure Network Data-plane

> Thanks for sharing. > > Did you test on ARM to see what the performance is? > > Hemant > > -Original Message- > From: vpp-dev@lists.fd.io On Behalf Of Maciek > Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via lists.fd.io > Sent: Wednesday, April 07, 2021 10:02 AM > To: cs

[vpp-dev] VPP: A Terabit Secure Network Data-plane

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ipQQmjzE_g0 -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#19124): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/19124 Mute This Topic: https://lists.fd.io/mt/81916291/21656 Group Owner: vpp-dev+ow...@lists.fd.io

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT-2101 Release Report is published

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2101 report is available on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2101/report/ Many thanks to all contributors in CSIT and VPP communities! See below for CSIT-2101 release summary and pointers to specific sections in the report. Welcome all comments, best by email

[vpp-dev] AMD and NAT44ed stateful benchmarks in updated CSIT-2009 Report

/packet_throughput_graphs/nat44-ed-tcp-pps.html > On 14 Oct 2020, at 21:58, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > wrote: > > Hi All, > > FD.io CSIT-2009 report is available on FD.io docs site: > >https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2009/report/ > > Great thanks to all contributo

Re: [vpp-committers] [vpp-dev] VPP committers: VPP PTL vote

+csit-dev Congrats Damjan - well done! And Dave, huge Thank You, once again, for starting and navigating the FD.io VPP project with skill, strength and wit, and for making FD.io what it is today, with a healthily growing FD.io community and code base across a diverse group of members and

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2005 Release Report

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2005 report has been published on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2005/report/ Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-2005 happen! See below for pointers to specific sections in the report.

[vpp-dev] LFN DCs network outage - CSIT test jobs stopped until further notice

Dear All, Due to ongoing network issues in LFN hosted Data Centres CSIT project is stopping all automated benchmarking tests until further notice. All daily and weekly trending, as well as CSIT-2005 report test jobs are stopped. LFN IT and Vexxhost teams are engaged. For latest see these two

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT-2001 update: Xeon Skylake Performance and Progressions/Regressions RCAs

Slides used on today’s VPP call: https://wiki.fd.io/view/File:200512-csit-vpp-readout.pptx > On 12 May 2020, at 15:18, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > wrote: > > Dear All, > > We have finally pushed out an update to CSIT-2001 report with VPP > performance data fo

[vpp-dev] CSIT-2001 update: Xeon Skylake Performance and Progressions/Regressions RCAs

Dear All, We have finally pushed out an update to CSIT-2001 report with VPP performance data for testbeds with Intel Xeon Skylake processors (2n-skx and 3n-skx testbeds), with SUT and TG servers impacted by firmware and OS upgrades (BIOS, ucode, kernel updates with mitigations against the newly

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2001 Release Report - CSIT-2001.09 update

/csit_release_notes.html https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2001/report/dpdk_performance_tests/csit_release_notes.html Welcome all comments, best by email to csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>. Cheers, -Maciek On 14 Feb 2020, at 14:02, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) mailto:mkons...@cis

Re: [vpp-dev] Gerrit 25463 fails API CRC check for no obvious reason...

Hi Dave, thanks for notifying, we have just discussed this on the CSIT project call, Vratko is looking into this. Here are the incompatible API CRCs that are tripping the job. Will notify on this thread once issue is nailed down. Cheers, -Maciek 13:24:04 Incompatible API CRCs found in

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-2001 Release Report

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-2001 report has been published on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls2001/report/ Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-2001 happen! Below three summaries: - Intel Xeon 2n-skx, 3n-skx and 2n-clx

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FDIO Maintenance - 2020-02-05 1900 UTC to 2400 UTC

Hi Vanessa, Many thanks for the heads-up. Unfortunately 05-Feb hits is in the middle of CSIT-2001 release, per published schedule here: https://wiki.fd.io/view/CSIT/csit2001_plan Is there any chance to postpone this upgrade till after 19-Feb, which is +1 week after our report publish target

Re: [vpp-dev] [tsc] FD.io Production Jenkins Restart Required

Hi Vanessa, Thanks for the note. CSIT project keeps experiencing issues due to Jenkins outages. Do you have ETA for the fix that will stop these outages? -Maciek > On 5 Nov 2019, at 23:18, Vanessa Valderrama > wrote: > > Jenkins has been restarted, job views restored, jobs are running. > >

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-1908 Release Report

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-1908 report has been published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1908/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1908/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1908.pdf Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and wider FD.io community who contributed and worked hard to make

[vpp-dev] CSIT-1908 draft report preview available, need help with two VPP performance regressions

Hi, A draft version of CSIT-1908 test and benchmarking report is available on the CSIT master report link: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/report/index.html Most of the selected benchmarking tests have been completed including: - All Xeon Skylake and Haswell NDR and PDR tests - all in draft

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] FD.io Jenkins Maintenance: 2019-08-29 @ 1700 UTC and 2019-08-30 @ 1700 UTC

Thank you Vanessa for this good news! We are aiming to complete the critical part of the CSIT-1908 testing jobs by 04-Sep, will keep you and the team posted. Cheers, -Maciek On 29 Aug 2019, at 18:18, Vanessa Valderrama mailto:vvalderr...@linuxfoundation.org>> wrote: Sandbox upgrade is

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.08 release is available!

Congrats to All involved in vpp-dev and FD.io on timely and feature-rich VPP v19.08 release! Andrew, congrats on 19.08 and best of luck for the next 10 yrs! ;) Cheers, -Maciek On 21 Aug 2019, at 22:19, Damjan Marion via Lists.Fd.Io mailto:dmarion=me@lists.fd.io>> wrote:

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-1904 Benchmarking Report

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-1904 report has been published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1904/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1904/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1904.pdf Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and FD.io community who contributed and worked hard to make CSIT-1904

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP 19.04 Release is complete!

Great work All! On 24 Apr 2019, at 23:06, Dave Wallace mailto:dwallac...@gmail.com>> wrote: Folks, I am pleased to announce that the VPP 19.04 Release is complete and the release artifacts are available on PackageCloud: https://packagecloud.io/fdio/release Many thanks to all of the VPP &

[vpp-dev] Published: Tech paper - "Benchmarking SW Data Planes Intel Xeon Skylake vs. Broadwell"

Hi, We finally managed to get the go ahead to publish above technical paper. Workloads tested: VPP, OVS-DPDK, DPDK(testpmd,l3fwd), CoreMark. Processors tested: Intel Xeon Skylake vs. Broadwell. Compared side-by-side: performance and efficiency of workloads/processors. Thanks to all

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Heads up: API cleanup

// re-adding vpp-dev, Neale, Ole Vratko, thanks for spotting! Spoke with Neale, he confirmed route add/del API changes should be transparent to VAT per his updates in [1]. If you spotted any VatExecutor breakage, then this would need to be fixed before [2] is merged. And as CSIT embarked on VAT

[vpp-dev] Published: FD.io CSIT-1901 Open-Source Benchmarking Report

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-1901 report has been published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1901/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1901/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1810.pdf Many thanks to All in CSIT, VPP and FD.io community who contributed, worked very hard to make

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT-18.10.w47 Weekly Maintenance Report Update

FD.io CSIT-18.10.w47 weekly maintenance report has been published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1810/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1810/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1810.pdf Changes from last week .w46 version: 1. Added automated wrapping of long test names

[vpp-dev] FD.io compute infra down -

Nexus(?) backend to nginx is reporting down. Resolution time? Cheers, -Maciek [cid:876751CF-C733-46B9-9A07-8298C0A0A0C8@cisco.com] -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Links: You receive all messages sent to this group. View/Reply Online (#11286): https://lists.fd.io/g/vpp-dev/message/11286 Mute This Topic:

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT Project weekly meeting - UTC GMT time change, UK and EU no change

Hi, Just wanted to make everyone aware that today’s call is taking place at 15:00-16:00 UTC, as UK and Europe moved away from Daylight Saving Time (BST, CEST respectively), and looking thru the window Summer time is definitely over, so time to change our regular habits :) Updated details are in

Re: [vpp-dev] VAT api changes 5507192..8807674

Is it still broken? -Maciek On 3 Oct 2018, at 09:11, Peter Mikus via Lists.Fd.Io mailto:pmikus=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote: Hello devs, Recently in CSIT we are facing the issue with vpp_api_test console with JSON enabled, when calling dump_interface_table: dump_interface_table:6017: JSON

[vpp-dev] FD.io talks at ONS EU in AMS last week

FYI, here are the Compressed PDF copies of slides presented at EU Open Network Summit in Amsterday. Some material has been out there but got adopted. Some is nett new, produced by speakers/authors. On-site response was good, let’s see what the survey says.. if we ever see the results. If we’re

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT-18.07 v1.0 report published

Hi All, FD.io CSIT-18.07 report has been published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1807/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1807/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1807.pdf Many thanks to All in CSIT and FD.io community who contributed and made CSIT-18.07 happen!

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

of them is answering why is this happening. Peter Mikus Engineer – Software Cisco Systems Limited From: csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io> [mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via Lists.Fd.Io Sent: Friday, July 27, 2018 6:53 PM To: Al

Re: [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

uraj Linkeš mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>> Date: Friday, July 27, 2018 at 7:25 AM To: "Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan)" mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> Cc: "vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>" mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>>, csit-dev mailto:csi

[vpp-dev] CSIT VIRL P0 migration to make test completed

Just wanted to confirm that the last patches for ecmp ip4 and ip6 tests got merged [1]. With this VIRL P0 [2] test migration to VPP make test is completed. Ed, per discussion on last Tue vpp-dev call, you may want to disable vpp-csit-verify-virl-master [3] voting on VPP patches. -Maciek [1]

Re: [vpp-dev] Parallel test execution in VPP Test Framework

On 19 Jul 2018, at 15:44, Juraj Linkeš mailto:juraj.lin...@pantheon.tech>> wrote: Hi VPP devs, I'm implementing parallel test execution of tests in VPP Test Framework (the patch is here https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/13491/) and the last big outstanding question is how scalable the

[vpp-dev] VPP l2 path regressions in trending

Full set of detected regressions is listed in VPP Performance Dashboard [1]. Subset of tests reporting packet throughput regressions ~10%: 1. v18.11-rc0-13 to rc0-19 a. some tests with 64B throughput drop: - -10% - 10ge2p1x710-64b-1t1c-eth-l2xcbase-eth-2memif-1lxc-mrr - -8% -

[vpp-dev] CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: DPDK link bonding

Summary: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/introduction/failures.html CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: DPDK link bonding Failed_tests_count: 14 Failed_tests_list:

[vpp-dev] CSIT_VPP_trending_regressions: 1t1c summary

Summary: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/introduction/index.html#vpp-worker-on-1t1c Regression_tests_count: 15 Regression_tests_list:

[vpp-dev] CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: ip4scale, ip6scale

Summary: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/introduction/failures.html CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: DPDK link bonding Failed_tests_count: 18 Failed_tests_list:

[vpp-dev] CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: IPSec

Summary: https://docs.fd.io/csit/master/trending/introduction/failures.html CSIT_VPP_trending_failures: DPDK link bonding Failed_tests_count: 10 Failed_tests_list:

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] VPP make test gives false positive

Any updates on the latest status? -Maciek > On 22 Jun 2018, at 18:07, Ole Troan wrote: > >> 13188 is already merged. > > 13186 fails consistently locally too, investigating. > I think this was introduced with a98346f664aae148d26a8e158008b773d73db96f > > Cheers, > Ole > > >> >> From:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] Draft proposal to introduce a new set of integration tests

ting. . Atom: TBC. * Project: FD.io<http://FD.io> CSIT. . Plan: progress in rls1807. On 6 Jun 2018, at 14:25, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) via Lists.Fd.Io mailto:mkonstan=cisco@lists.fd.io>> wrote: Thanks for all comments! Here is an up

Re: [vpp-dev] How to trigger perf test and compare the results

Hi Zhiyong, We’re in the process of adding gerrit triggers to provide more complete coverage of MRR tests per vpp patch. What (NIC,featureset) combination(s) are you after? -Maciek On 31 May 2018, at 10:55, Damjan Marion mailto:dmarion.li...@gmail.com>> wrote: Dear Zhiyong, csit-dev is

[vpp-dev] Experimental: MDR Search

Hi, We have been working on improving NDR/PDR search for CSIT throughput tests, focusing specifically on reducing the overall search time so that we could run them more frequently. The result is a new duration aware multi-phase multi-rate search algorithm, that we call Multiple Drop Rate (MDR).

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1804 report published

/report/test_configuration/index.html [11] https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1804/report/test_operational_data/index.html > On 6 May 2018, at 18:58, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > <mkons...@cisco.com> wrote: > > CSIT rls1804 draft report is out: > > https://docs.f

[vpp-dev] VPP Performance Trending - the Dashboard is out

Hi, Per updates on VPP and CSIT project calls, few of us in CSIT worked on getting the VPP performance trending into a usable shape. We got there in the end, initial (experimental!) version is out. Thanks to Peter, Tibor and Vratko for great work, I was just complaining :) The results are

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] VPP 18.04 has been released! Artifacts are available on nexus.fd.io

Super - Congrats folks !! -Maciek On 26 Apr 2018, at 00:56, Dave Wallace > wrote: Most Excellent! Thanks Chris for all of your work on getting the release out the door. Also many thanks to all of the VPP committers and FD.io

Re: [csit-dev] [vpp-dev] ARM vpp-dpdk-dkms nexus artifacts - CSIT

Vratko Polak -X (vrpolak - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <vrpo...@cisco.com<mailto:vrpo...@cisco.com>>; Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) <mgrad...@cisco.com<mailto:mgrad...@cisco.com>>; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco

Re: [vpp-dev] ARM vpp-dpdk-dkms nexus artifacts - CSIT

Thanks Peter ! This is affecting all CSIT vpp and honeycomb jobs that rely on Nexus images, including ALL periodic jobs - daily performance trending jobs, and semi-weekly and weekly jobs.. Ed, Vanessa, Could you pls help here? We will open the helpdesk ticket (Peter pls do that). -Maciek

[vpp-dev] CSIT rls1801 performance regressions - update

Update on the four rls1801 performance regressions reported in CSIT rls1801 report[1]: 1. CSIT-925 Plugin induced NDR/PDR regression a. All plugins loaded (VPP default) shows throughput variability of 3..5% for all NIC2NIC tests; b. Initial regression tests isolated a group of 6 "bad"

[vpp-dev] VPP performance trending and analysis - need feedback

Hi, We’ve been working with Tibor and few other csit-dev and vpp-dev folks on the design to improve VPP performance trend tracking and automate anomaly detection (regression/progression). Result of this work is a design write-up published here:

[vpp-dev] number of csit-vpp jobs failing on vpp master branch - RCA wip

Heads-up - resolution in progress.. -Maciek Begin forwarded message: From: Maciek Konstantynowicz > Subject: number of csit-vpp jobs failing on vpp master branch - RCA wip Date: 6 March 2018 at 14:54:39 GMT To:

Re: [vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

> I don't see any 'Known Issues' covering these? > > Ray K > > On 19/02/2018 17:06, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) wrote: >> Dear FD.io <http://FD.io> community, >> *The CSIT rls1801 report is now published on FD.io <http://FD.io> docs site:* >> *html:

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1801 report published

Dear FD.io community, The CSIT rls1801 report is now published on FD.io docs site: html: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1801/report/ pdf: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1801/report/_static/archive/csit_rls1801.pdf Many Thanks to All CSIT Contributors and Committers

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP/AArch64 - fd.io

Thanks Tina! Gabriel, Hongjun, Tina reported on the last VPP call the kubeproxy tests are failing in vpp make test on Aarch64. I just checked on x86, and kubeproxy NAT44 and NAT66 tests pass, but NAT46 and NAT64 fail. Is this the issue that you’re hitting on Aarch64, or something else?

Re: [vpp-dev] api functions using shared memory

+csit-dev In CSIT we are after clocks per node data, but may need all info from “show run” output to automatically qualify the “show run” output values. Is your patch ge9483 going to get us there? -Maciek On 30 Nov 2017, at 14:15, Luke, Chris

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1710 report published

Dear FD.io community, The CSIT rls1710 report is now published on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1710/report/ Many Thanks to All CSIT Contributors and Committers to make CSIT rls1710 happen ! Many Thanks to all folks that collaborated with CSIT

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

e Jira ticket VPP-963. Regards, John From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:28 AM To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com<mailto:bmcf...@re

[vpp-dev] Fwd: VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com<mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>>, "csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>" <csit-...@lists.fd.io<mailto:csit-...@lists.fd.io>>, vpp-dev <vpp-dev@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev@lists.fd.io>> Cc: "Maciek

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

e Jira ticket VPP-963. Regards, John From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io<mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io> [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On Behalf Of Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) Sent: Wednesday, September 13, 2017 10:28 AM To: Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com<mailto:bmcf...@re

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

28 Aug 2017, at 18:11, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: On 28 Aug 2017, at 17:47, Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com<mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

On 28 Aug 2017, at 17:47, Billy McFall <bmcf...@redhat.com<mailto:bmcf...@redhat.com>> wrote: On Mon, Aug 28, 2017 at 8:53 AM, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: + csit-dev Billy, Per the last week CSIT

[vpp-dev] Fwd: VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

Dear vpp-dev, Pls let us know if CSIT team can assist any further with resolving this v1707 regression: VPP v17.07 L2BD NDR and PDR multi-thread performance broken [https://jira.fd.io/browse/VPP-963 VPP-963] VPP-963 ticket includes git

Re: [vpp-dev] VPP Performance drop from 17.04 to 17.07

+ csit-dev Billy, Per the last week CSIT project call, from CSIT perspective, we classified your reported issue as Test coverage escape. Summary === CSIT test coverage got fixed, see more detail below. The CSIT tests uncovered regression for L2BD with MAC learning with higher total number

[vpp-dev] FD.io CSIT rls1707 report published

The CSIT rls1707 report is published on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1707/report/ Many Thanks to All Contributors and Committers that worked on csit rls1707 and made it happen ! And of course Many Thanks to VPP contributors and committers that gave us a solid

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

I’m easy either way, community decides :) -Maciek On 6 Jul 2017, at 17:32, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: Our emails crossed mid-air, so resending here. Your patchwork https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7457/ Would need to ap

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

Our emails crossed mid-air, so resending here. Your patchwork https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/7457/ Would need to applied to all stable VPP branches to make it work. Can’t we do it by keeping the symlink in place, and my patch ? -Maciek On 6 Jul 2017, at 17:25, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

ory back on 20-Apr thought about the cases like this :) -Maciek On 6 Jul 2017, at 17:16, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: Dave, Looks like we’ve been working on this in parallel. This is the fix, yes: diff --git a/jjb/vpp/

Re: [vpp-dev] 17.07 CIST Failures : FW: Change in vpp[stable/1704]: DHCP complete event includes the subnet mask

Dave, Looks like we’ve been working on this in parallel. This is the fix, yes: diff --git a/jjb/vpp/include-raw-vpp-build.sh b/jjb/vpp/include-raw-vpp-build.sh index 5e603d2..582971c 100644 --- a/jjb/vpp/include-raw-vpp-build.sh +++ b/jjb/vpp/include-raw-vpp-build.sh @@ -32,16 +32,16 @@ echo

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] about UT test framework for VPP

+vpp-dev. yes, vpp make-test. https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1704/report/vpp_unit_tests/index.html https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.04/vpp_make_test/html/ -Maciek On 6 Jul 2017, at 10:34, wang.hu...@zte.com.cn wrote: Hi all Does vpp has some kind of UT test framework ,

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] [FD.io Helpdesk #41298] Jobs are not triggered from gerrit

it seems to be working now. many thanks Vanessa and team ! -Maciek > On 31 May 2017, at 21:28, Vanessa Valderrama via RT > wrote: > > Restarting the plugin appears to have resolved this issue. I've run several > rechecks that all triggered properly.

Re: [vpp-dev] CSIT borked on master

+csit-dev -Maciek > On 15 May 2017, at 18:09, Neale Ranns (nranns) wrote: > > > I hope so. We changed the version from 17.05-vpp1 to 17.05-vpp2 today. I > suspect your build started while we were in flux. If the next one fails, > we’ll look deeper. > > Most Jobs are

[vpp-dev] CSIT rls1704 report published

The CSIT rls1704 report is published on FD.io docs site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1704/report/ Many Thanks to All Contributors and Committers that worked on csit rls1704 and made it happen ! And of course Many Thanks to VPP contributors and committers that gave us a solid piece of VPP

Re: [vpp-dev] Feedback on vhost-user / VM usage

ic > > On Thu, Apr 13, 2017 at 11:52:26AM +, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) > wrote: >> +csit-dev >> >> Eric, >> >> The way we test vpp vhostuser in CSIT is by generating packet streams >> from external traffic generator per VM topology shown a

Re: [vpp-dev] Feedback on vhost-user / VM usage

+csit-dev Eric, The way we test vpp vhostuser in CSIT is by generating packet streams from external traffic generator per VM topology shown at this link: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1701/report/vpp_performance_tests/overview.html#tested-physical-topologies VM vhostuser testing methodology

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] No traffic to vhost-user after restart VPP and reconfigure

Reconnect requires QEMU 2.7 or later: http://wiki.qemu.org/ChangeLog/2.7#virtio CSIT is on QEMU version 2.5.0. -Maciek On 5 Apr 2017, at 03:30, Dave Wallace > wrote: Matej, There has been a long standing issue with vhost-user reconnection to

Re: [vpp-dev] IPsec Multi-Tunnel performance test suite failure

on...@intel.com<mailto:sergio.gonzalez.mon...@intel.com>>; 'Rybalchenko, Kirill' <kirill.rybalche...@intel.com<mailto:kirill.rybalche...@intel.com>>; 'Nicolau, Radu' <radu.nico...@intel.com<mailto:radu.nico...@intel.com>>; Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] VPP receive no tagged packet on Virtio interface

We have other tests using dot1q VLAN tags, and they work in VIRL e.g. eth2p-dot1ad-l2bdbasemaclrn-vlantrans22-func.robot eth2p-dot1q-l2bdbasemaclrn-eth-2vhost-1vm-func.robot eth2p-dot1q-l2bdbasemaclrn-vlantrans11-func.robot What’s different here from VIRL L2 connectivity perspective?

[vpp-dev] Fwd: Updated CSIT rls1704 plan..

FYI - pls send your feedback on content and priorities to csit-...@lists.fd.io. -Maciek Begin forwarded message: From: Maciek Konstantynowicz > Subject: Updated CSIT rls1704 plan.. Date: 7 March 2017 at 15:49:27 GMT To:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] VPP receive no tagged packet on Virtio interface

Well spotted Neale :) Matej, Looks like few typos in there.. -Maciek On 6 Mar 2017, at 16:19, Dave Barach (dbarach) > wrote: +1... Crud, missed that... Thanks… Dave From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io

Re: [vpp-dev] Interesting perf test results from Red Hat's test team

Thomas, many thanks for sending this. Few comments and questions after reading the slides: 1. s3 clarification - host and data plane thread setup - vswitch pmd (data plane) thread placement a. "1PMD/core (4 core)” - HT (SMT) disabled, 4 phy cores used for vswitch, each with data plane

[vpp-dev] CSIT rls1701 report published

The CSIT rls1701 report is published on FD.io site: https://docs.fd.io/csit/rls1701/report/ Many thanks to all contributors, especially to Peter Mikus for coding report auto-generation scripts. Thanks also to Ed and Vanessa for helping out with FD.io infra

Re: [vpp-dev] [honeycomb-dev] Honeycomb 1.17.01 Released

Congrats All ! -Maciek On 30 Jan 2017, at 16:00, Marek Gradzki -X (mgradzki - PANTHEON TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) > wrote: The honeycomb 1.17.01 release is up. Honeycomb artifacts can be found on nexus:

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] crypto-dev support/libraries

u drink locally where I live). So bit it. You know who you are ! :) On 16 Jan 2017, at 19:42, Maciek Konstantynowicz (mkonstan) <mkons...@cisco.com<mailto:mkons...@cisco.com>> wrote: //resending with corrected Kirill email +Ed - known to be able to resolve tricky cross-project bui

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] crypto-dev support/libraries

//resending with corrected Kirill email +Ed - known to be able to resolve tricky cross-project build issues. +vpp-dev - to avoid circular thread references :) Sergio, On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:00, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy >

Re: [vpp-dev] [csit-dev] crypto-dev support/libraries

+Ed - known to be able to resolve tricky cross-project build issues. +vpp-dev - to avoid circular thread references :) Sergio, On 11 Jan 2017, at 17:00, Sergio Gonzalez Monroy > wrote: I'll copy from the thread I

  1   2   >