Well, as I said, it worked on SUSE distro...
I'm modifying the patch to have a OS check so to remove this dependency for SUSE
since the "check" version we ship does not have that dependency (and we don't
have subunit at all as previously mentioned).
- Marco
On Wed, 2017-10-11 at 06:35 +, Kle
Hi Burt,
these are existing issues in API files. E.g.
>ERROR:VAPI C GEN:While parsing message `pot_profile_add': variable length
>array `list_name' doesn't have reference to member containing the actual
>length
means the python script generating new C/C++ API bindings (vapi) was unab
Hi Marco,
as you can see in your review build failure, removing -lsubunit breaks
existing stuff...
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:46:13)
> Hi Klement,
>
> Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
> test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at
Hi Neale,
Below is the trace.
Thanks!
Michael.
00:05:18:275995: dpdk-input
GigabitEthernet0/4/0 rx queue 0
buffer 0x446a: current data 14, length 68, free-list 0, clone-count 0,
totlen-nifb 0, trace 0x1
PKT MBUF: port 0, nb_segs 1, pkt_len 82
buf_len 2176, data_len 82, ol_flags 0x0
OK, Thanks!
I added Damjan to review.
--Tom
On 10/10/2017 05:17 PM, Florin Coras wrote:
Hi Tom,
As long as the patches have a jira ticket, procedurally all is fine
with me. However, since we’re so close to release, I’d like Damjan,
since he’s the build infra manager, to vet the changes.
Hi Tom,
As long as the patches have a jira ticket, procedurally all is fine with me.
However, since we’re so close to release, I’d like Damjan, since he’s the build
infra manager, to vet the changes.
Regards,
Florin
> On Oct 10, 2017, at 12:24 PM, Thomas F Herbert wrote:
>
> Dave, Florin,
On Tue, Oct 10, 2017 at 2:41 PM, John Lo (loj) wrote:
> The two APIs affected are the older ones in L2FIB which use “u64 mac”
> instead of “u8 mac[6]” to pass MAC addresses:
>
> ·L2fib_add_del
>
> ·L2_fib_table_details
>
>
>
> I believe it is a good change to reduce confusion wrt
+1 Sounds good to me
From: vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io [mailto:vpp-dev-boun...@lists.fd.io] On
Behalf Of John Lo (loj)
Sent: Tuesday, October 10, 2017 15:42
To: Jerome Tollet (jtollet) ; Mohsin Kazmi (sykazmi)
; vpp-dev
Subject: Re: [vpp-dev] Mac Address Api Changes
The two APIs affected are t
The two APIs affected are the older ones in L2FIB which use “u64 mac” instead
of “u8 mac[6]” to pass MAC addresses:
·L2fib_add_del
·L2_fib_table_details
I believe it is a good change to reduce confusion wrt how 6-byte MAC is stored
in u64 with big/little endian hosts. The chang
Dave, Florin,
I have two patches in gerrit for stable/1710, both with JIRAs.
Is there a chance that these can make it into 1710-rc2? They both fix
problems that break rpm builds but add no additional features.
I want to confirm I am following the correct procedure. One was
originally submitt
+1, it would be nice to harmonize those API calls.
Jerome
De : au nom de Mohsin Kazmi
Date : lundi 9 octobre 2017 à 19:06
À : vpp-dev
Objet : [vpp-dev] Mac Address Api Changes
Hello,
I am writing regarding a proposal to change API messages related to l2fib mac
address.
In vpp/src/vnet
The build completes without error, but I see a lot of these ERROR:VAPI
messages, so I thought I'd ask if it is normal. Thanks.
Burt
make[5]: Entering directory
'/home/burts/vpp3/build-root/build-vpp-native/vpp/vpp-api/vapi'
VAPI C GEN tcp.api.json vapi/tcp.api.vapi.h
VAPI C GEN span.api.json
On 10/10/2017 10:46 AM, Marco Varlese wrote:
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
I submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8736
Subunit is a prerequisite for check
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 18:12, Justin Iurman wrote:
>
> Hi folks,
>
> I was just wondering how I could build my own plugin without rebuilding
> everything from scratch in vpp ? I mean, here are two ways I found to build a
> plugin:
> - First technique (long, rebuilds everything):
> https://doc
Hi folks,
I was just wondering how I could build my own plugin without rebuilding
everything from scratch in vpp ? I mean, here are two ways I found to build a
plugin:
- First technique (long, rebuilds everything):
https://docs.fd.io/vpp/17.07/sample_plugin_doc.html
- Second technique (fast, on
On 10/10/2017 10:03 AM, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
Hi Marco,
this issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing
is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install
check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from te
Thanks a ton Jeff.
I merged 8717, 8718 and proposed a different fix to 8716
(https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8729/).
I also noticed netlink plugin does not compile on 1710 and master due to a
change in VPP (Mostly renaming which happened here
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8366/2).
I have a patch ready
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
I submitted a patch for review:
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8736/
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 14:03 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PAN
Hi Klement,
Yes, once check-devel is in place, then we can remove -lsubunit from
test/ext/Makefile. Things would still work (at least on openSUSE).
Cheers,
Marco
On Tue, 2017-10-10 at 14:03 +, Klement Sekera -X (ksekera - PANTHEON
TECHNOLOGIES at Cisco) wrote:
> Hi Marco,
>
> this issue is
Hi Michael,
Both of;
vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via GigabitEthernet0/4/0 Accept
vppctl ip mroute 224.0.0.0/8 via local Forward
the first says you are accepting (i.e RPF checks on) GigE0/4/0 the second says
you are ‘forwarding/replicating’ to VPP’s local IP stack.
The mfib equivalent of th
Yep,
Yeah it is a work in progress for sub-interface support + the corresponding
unit tests... is that the use case you have in mind ?
--a
> On 10 Oct 2017, at 08:45, khers wrote:
>
> Hi,
> As far as I checked in vpp 17.07 branch version, It seems that the
> vlan tagged(dot1q) packets don't p
Hi Marco,
this issue is already being investigated by Tom Herbert. Strange thing
is that check requires subunit. I wonder if it works if you install
check only. Could you try removing -lsubunit from test/ext/Makefile?
Thanks,
Klement
Quoting Marco Varlese (2017-10-10 16:00:00)
> Hi all,
>
> As
Hi all,
As of last week I could happily run tests (e.g. make test) on my distribution
(openSUSE).
When I tried again today - with latest master - I couldn't anymore:
make[2]: Entering directory '/home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/test/ext'
cc -o /home/mvarlese/repo/vpp/build-root/vapi_test/vapi_c_test -std
Hello,
I want to add a new tokenizer in_port in mask field while creating classify
table.I dont want to make it part of l2 , l3 or l4 mask. The mask size will
get increased. Will it affect the performance ?? Is there any limit on the
mask size ??
Regards,
Avinash
Hi Michael,
Could you give me a ‘sh trace’ ?
Thanks,
neale
From: on behalf of Michael Borokhovich
Date: Monday, 9 October 2017 at 18:14
To: vpp-dev
Subject: [vpp-dev] Router plugin with VPP 1707 - incoming OSPF Hello packets
are dropped by VPP
Hi,
After applying the fixes suggested by Je
Thanks a ton Jeff.
I merged 8717, 8718 and proposed a different fix to 8716
(https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8729/).
I also noticed netlink plugin does not compile on 1710 and master due to a
change in VPP (Mostly renaming which happened here
https://gerrit.fd.io/r/#/c/8366/2).
I have a patch ready
26 matches
Mail list logo
