Can you send your queries in sort mail, it's too long mail.
On Wed, 1 Mar, 2023, 4:43 am Srikanth Akula, wrote:
> Hi Team,
>
> Any help is appreciated on this topic.
> We are trying to do a POC with IPSec+Ikev plugin of vpp , any
> suggestions/pointers would be helpful in this regard.
>
>
Memif based on share memory communication. There is concept of slave /
master, where one folk involve one copy.
Can you check and share unidirectional max speed without pkt processing?
BTW, I am not impressed with memif library, hence idea is look for better
aproach for share memory instead
Thanks ben,
Inline please,
On Tue, 9 Nov, 2021, 7:24 pm Benoit Ganne (bganne) via lists.fd.io, wrote:
> Hi Ben,
>
> DPDK is definitely supported in VPP but it has performance impacts
In case, we have performance bench marking, please share with us.
and also carries a lot of dependencies
Let me close this.
I am not paid by dpdk Or vpp.
It my indivisual thoughts.
Sorry if I *...
On Tue, 9 Nov, 2021, 1:30 am Damjan Marion, wrote:
>
>
> > On 08.11.2021., at 20:21, Mrityunjay Kumar wrote:
> >
> > Thank you for the clarificatio
Thank you for the clarification.
Inline please,
On Tue, 9 Nov, 2021, 12:45 am Damjan Marion, wrote:
> >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Mon, 8 Nov, 2021, 10:18 pm Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io, me@lists.fd.io> wrote:
> > >
> > > No, I didn’t bother… Not using DPDK for a long time...
> >
> >
iled VPP with DPDK or not?
>
> Even if it is valid question for dpdk community, I dont feel like I am
> e-mail relay agent.
> Everybody have a freedom to go and ask question on the DPDK mailing list.
>
> —
> Damjan
>
>
>
> > On 08.11.2021., at 19:18, Mrityunjay Kumar
Damjan, hi again
Is it possible to share comunity queries to DPDK team?
DPDK: it's self is very big code base.
I am only users of both open source. Knowledge exchange are appreciated.
/MJ
On Mon, 8 Nov, 2021, 10:18 pm Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io, wrote:
>
> No, I didn’t bother… Not
branch (updated just today) and compiled within the
> machine.
>
> If you need more information, just ask.
>
>
>
> El Jueves, Octubre 28, 2021 18:45 CEST, "Mrityunjay Kumar" <
> kumarn...@gmail.com> Ha escrito:
>
>
> Roger Hi,
>
> I tri
Roger Hi,
I tried to understand the problem, but sorry lost by watching long mail
content,
I would like to ask 1 line Q?
Is this your experiments work in linux m/c?
If yes, then we will start evaluation your requirement.
) MJ
On Thu, 28 Oct, 2021, 7:55 pm Roger Garcia Ferre, wrote:
> Hi,
Damjon Hi,
I am users of DPDK since August 2011, and VPP guess it was Jan 2017,
Not sure, about contributor but we should think to take dpdk as main frame
in VPP,
For this, we need to deprecate vlib_buffer_t, marry entire VPP with
rte_mbuf,
This can lead to avoid extra overhead to translate
:28 pm Damjan Marion, wrote:
>
> And what is the benefit of doing that?
>
> —
> Damjan
>
>
>
> On 24.10.2021., at 11:24, Mrityunjay Kumar wrote:
>
> Well, I can dump my opinion regarding this. we can disable memif plugin
> and same feature can be achieved
10.2021., at 00:16, Mrityunjay Kumar wrote:
>
>
> Damjan,
>
> I think you are trying to explain one copy always occurs in memif
> communication,
>
>
> Currently VPP memif plugin is wrongly/misleadingly written and it also
> misguiding to VPP users.
>
> When I look this
Satya Hi,
INPUT node and Process node has its diffrent culture and uses.
Input nodes are siblings of ethernet input but process nodes are light
weight threads which run always on main threads.
In case you have any workers cpu configured, main thread never went for
polling until not configured
Damjan,
I think you are trying to explain one copy always occurs in memif
communication,
Currently VPP memif plugin is wrongly/misleadingly written and it also
misguiding to VPP users.
When I look this code long back, it also misleading me.
On Sat, 23 Oct, 2021, 11:52 pm Damjan Marion via
On Fri, 22 Oct, 2021, 2:44 pm Satya Murthy,
wrote:
> Hi VPP experts,
>
> We are using memif for communication between an APP and VPP.
> We recently tried moving to zero-copy memif based on the
> example icmp_responder-zero-copy-slave.
>
> This example shows the code for the APP being in SLAVE
*System call is nondeterministic, so why we call it from main, *
*But alternate solution can be disscus. Let me know what exactly you need
to think of vpp can be modified. *
On Fri, 1 Oct, 2021, 9:22 pm Prashant Upadhyaya,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Wanted to find out if it is safe to call a shell
Hi Artem
What is your use case. Do you want to ping from vpp1 to vpp2 via memif or ?
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 4:55 PM Artem Glazychev
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have a problem - unnumbered IPv6 interface is not working.
>
>
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:43 PM Mohsen Meamarian
wrote:
> Hello to all dear friends,
>
> I have trouble getting high throughput from VPP. Where and how can I apply
> configurations that make the throughput as much as poss
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 6:57 PM Prashant Upadhyaya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using VPP21.06
> In vlib_buffer_advance there is the following assert --
> ASSERT ((b->flags & VLIB_BUFFER_NEXT_PRESENT) == 0 ||
>
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Mon, Sep 6, 2021 at 2:35 PM Prashant Upadhyaya
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using VPP21.06.
> I have successfully created an IPSec tunnel between VPP and a Strong Swan
> peer.
> Packets from VPP are going into ESP towards
Please find the comment inline below.
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Fri, Sep 3, 2021 at 9:52 PM Damjan Marion wrote:
>
>
> On 03.09.2021., at 12:05, Mrityunjay Kumar wrote:
>
> Damjan Hi,
>
>
> I’m so sorry for pointing but I’d like to ma
because,
different vpp interface can have different number of tx queues.
//MJ
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Wed, Apr 14, 2021 at 4:54 PM Damjan Marion via lists.fd.io wrote:
>
>
> On 14.04.2021., at 13:21, Marcos - Mgiga wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
>
VPP supports fragmentation in ipsec, but overall buffer size limit is 2048,
If mtu is 1500, then you can effort 2 fragment,
Not other than that as owe current role of vpp
On Fri, 16 Jul, 2021, 3:30 pm Vijay Kumar, wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does VPP IPSec support fragmentation of the traffic. I mean
You can build vpp in debug mode, and also add in startup.conf -> unix
section + full-core-dump***
MJ
On Wed, 30 Jun, 2021, 4:02 pm chetan bhasin,
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am using VPP 2005 with DPDK enabled. If the application crashes under
> dpdk library api , We won't be getting proper symbols
Hi Expert
I have quick question. Does vpp support IPv4 over IPv6 ipsec tunnel?
If yes, then might be we are missing something. If no then is there any
patch available for same.
We are using vpp vesrion: 20.01
/MJ
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
and the application will
be the producer. This can be achieved by multiple way but need to put a
huge amount of effort.
I will suggest trying to explore memif library and your can send your
packet to vpp vai memif_input node.
:)
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Fri, Jun 25
Shubh* Hi,
Nice to hear,, but better you start contribution before your warning of
contribution.
Contribution appreciate but not advice and promotion.
Good Luck爛
On Sat, 17 Apr, 2021, 2:01 am , wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I am Shubham Mishra, A student from India, I am fascinated by modern
>
Hi Nikhil
Share me all CLI commands which you have triggered to vpp. I am sure you
forgot to set your interface to your IP table.
*"set interface ip table "*
Use this and enjoy the weekend
*//MJ*
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Thu, Mar 11, 2021 a
reassembly on*
Maybe some experts can say by default reassembly is enabled on the
interface but it's not.
try it once, let us know , still u r facing problems. ??
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Wed, Dec 2, 2020 at 9:10 PM Elias Rudberg
wrote:
> Hello VPP expe
VPP is receiving the packet and drop in application look up.
Packet gen sending to 10.99.204.8, that is one of the vpp interface.
Now tell me what you are trying to achieve here,
/MJ
On Fri, 20 Nov, 2020, 4:09 pm Merve, wrote:
> Hi everyone,
> I use dpdk-pktgen for packet generate. Then I
Hi Techi,
let me try to help you.
Inline please :)
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Sat, Aug 15, 2020 at 12:16 AM wrote:
> [Edited Message Follows]
> Hello all, Thank you for your inputs.
>
> Let me elaborate my use case. I currently have DPDK router pi
Hope this will work for you. *
*:)*
*//MJ *
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Mon, Aug 10, 2020 at 11:03 AM wrote:
> Hello Team,
>
> How do I send packets out on a physical interface after I received them
> through libmemif in non-vpp application from VPP(DPDK)? D
No!
Currently vpp does not support if my code understanding is correct. Can you
share me, why you need this? Can't you achieve this by others ways. ???
/MJ
On Thu, 2 Jul 2020, 02:17 RaviKiran Veldanda, wrote:
> Hi Team,
> I realized that memif and corresponding sockets are tightly coupled.
>
] [fib-id
] [proxy - ]
vpp#
Please try it with adding route and arp.
you can also use this, to set vlan on vf.
#ip link set eth0 vf 18 valn 101 --> u not required to create vlan
interface in vpp.
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 6:59 PM Balaj
as well.
Can you try with IPv6, you will see more surprises. :)
//MJ
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Fri, May 15, 2020 at 7:55 AM Laurent Dumont
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I was doing some initial experimentation with VPP/SRIOV/DPDK and I just
> wanted to see if some o
> We measured IPv4 forwarding performance in the beginning of 2019 (with
VPP Master branch) and got 5.77 MPPS with single core @ 1.6 GHz
---
Friends, what was the packet size with this MPPS. Good if you share some
more details.
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On
point me, how to bring up VPP on specific NUMA socket without any
changes in VPP 20.01, it will really appreciated.
//MJ
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#16390): https
[host-ip6-gw ] [host-mac-addr
] [host-if-name ] [host-mtu-size ]
[no-gso|gso|csum-offload]*
*cheers! *
*//MJ*
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Wed, May 13, 2020 at 11:18 AM Chinmaya Aggarwal
wrote:
> Hi,
> We have a use case where on a VPP machine, we wan
D,y)*
@# not needed
$(call set,RTE_ETHDEV_RXTX_CALLBACKS,n)
$(call set,RTE_LIBRTE_CFGFILE,n)
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 4:48 PM Mohammed Alshohayeb
wrote:
> I am facing crash issue on startup running Chelsio T6 NIC (cx
2.4 -
10.168.2.4
cheers! enjoy
//MJ
*Regards*,
Mrityunjay Kumar.
Mobile: +91 - 9731528504
On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 12:16 PM wrote:
> Hi VPP hackers,
> My program and vpp communicate through the memif interface.
> I want to make vpp match specific packets（such as
-off-by: Damjan Marion
Regards
Mrityunjay
From: Mrityunjay Kumar
Sent: Wednesday, July 31, 2019 2:28:54 PM
To: i...@fd.io ; vpp-dev@lists.fd.io
Cc: kmrityunj...@altiostar.com
Subject: VPP 19.04:: 14 bytes extra Overhead on memif, from master to slave
direction
Hi
I have observed that, there are 14 bytes extra overhead added in packet in case
of route from memif [master, mode: IP] to memif [salve, Mode:IP].
This 14 bytes overhead has been added by salve after receiving the packet from
mem interface.
To fix this issue, I have added/modified the
42 matches
Mail list logo
