i am currently using the Bertl-Shep stop fix which appears to be working for
the most part. Is there a permanent cure for this now?
I am currently using the following versions
latest as of 2 weeks ago gentoo 2005.1 install on host.
kernel 2.6.13.1 vanilla sources from kernel.org
with
On Sunday 02 October 2005 13:59, Chuck wrote:
I guess my question is more than one :) .
1. is the stop bug fixed
Yes, in the latest baselayout-vserver they're fixed.
That means you've currently to do the following inside your guests:
# echo '=sys-apps/baselayout-vserver-1.11.13-r1 ~x86 \
On Sunday 02 October 2005 08:31 am, Christian Heim wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 13:59, Chuck wrote:
I guess my question is more than one :) .
1. is the stop bug fixed
Yes, in the latest baselayout-vserver they're fixed.
That means you've currently to do the following inside your
On Sunday 02 October 2005 08:31 am, Christian Heim wrote:
2. if so what are the latest versions of the above?
* latest kernel patch is at 2.1.0_rc2 (IIRC)
- for Gentoo that is =vserver-sources-2.1.0_rc2 (~x86)
incorporating kernel-2.6.13.2 and vs2.1.0_rc2
the only reason i
On Sunday 02 October 2005 15:19, Chuck wrote:
the only reason i use vanilla kernels now is i have found on my
workstations and servers a noticable increase in performance using vanilla
over the gentoo-sources. i believe it is due to all the extra patches that
i dont use anyway :)
is the
On Sunday 02 October 2005 15:15, Chuck wrote:
snip
i need reliability more than 'bleeding edge' however i do need things like
exec inside a guest from host and abilities to flag various hosts to
autostart and things like that. we have no 64 bit guests or hosts so ...
exec as in vserver
On Sunday 02 October 2005 09:38 am, Christian Heim wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 15:15, Chuck wrote:
snip
i need reliability more than 'bleeding edge' however i do need things like
exec inside a guest from host and abilities to flag various hosts to
autostart and things like that. we
On Sunday 02 October 2005 15:48, Chuck wrote:
wrong terminology im sure :) the ability to set mark files and their
contents.
You mean the context tagging of files by any chance ?!
where can i find the differences between the 2 base layouts? i am getting
Well, the 1.12.0_pre stuff is AFAIK a
On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:46 am, Christian Heim wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 15:48, Chuck wrote:
wrong terminology im sure :) the ability to set mark files and their
contents.
You mean the context tagging of files by any chance ?!
no.. i dont know how long mark files have been
On Sunday 02 October 2005 11:49 am, Chuck wrote:
with these new versions of base layout and util-vserver, do we still need to
put this into a post start script?
vattribute --xid 3407 --flag ^37
or is that now not needed?
On Sunday 02 October 2005 10:46 am, Christian Heim wrote:
On
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:21, Chuck wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 11:49 am, Chuck wrote:
with these new versions of base layout and util-vserver, do we still need
to put this into a post start script?
vattribute --xid 3407 --flag ^37
or is that now not needed?
it is not needed with
On Sunday 02 October 2005 04:41 pm, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
ok cool thanks... one more quick one...
if i choose the latest 2005.1 standard p3 stage3 from the mirrors then
overlayed the guest baselayout is that sufficient or are there other changes
in the stage3 that i should stick with the
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:42, Chuck wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 04:41 pm, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
ok cool thanks... one more quick one...
if i choose the latest 2005.1 standard p3 stage3 from the mirrors then
overlayed the guest baselayout is that sufficient or are there other
On Sunday 02 October 2005 05:06 pm, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
i used your new methods to make the template and then make a stage3 of my own
and make a guest from that.. incredibly nice
On Sunday 02 October 2005 20:42, Chuck wrote:
On Sunday 02 October 2005 04:41 pm, Benedikt Boehm wrote:
14 matches
Mail list logo
