I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne
Blankerts
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
branch will be labeled 'stable')
HTH,
Herbert
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne
Blankerts
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2:27 PM
To: vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
On Sun, 2005-04-10
@list.linux-vserver.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5 Problem
I am confused, if it is stable why is the 1.9 branch called development.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arne
Blankerts
Sent: Sunday, April 10, 2005 2
Title: Message
how
stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a production
envoirnment. If it is not very stable, would the instability affect the vservers
or the main server. In my case I have a large site that would benefit if some of
the services on it is in a vserver, so I
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 11:35:03AM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote:
Hi,
i used the Kernel 2.6.10 and Patch before.. this worked nice.
with what tools?
But now i upgraded my Kernel to the latest Version with the new
vServer Patch on Kernel 2.6.11.5.
which patch version?
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 12:41:58PM +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote:
how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a
production envoirnment.
it seems to be at least as stable as the 2.6 branch of the kernel
If it is not very stable, would the
instability
On Sun, 2005-04-10 at 12:41 +0200, Ehab Heikal wrote:
how stable is the 2.6 branch of vserver, would you run it in a
production envoirnment.
Stable is very relative definition [tm]
I've been using the 2.6 branch on two production servers for quite some
time now with no known problems. Actually,
Re: [Vserver] Kernel 2.6.11.5
Problem
On Sun, Apr 10, 2005 at 05:48:08PM +0200, Dennis Paulisch wrote:
Output from your Script...
Linux-VServer Test [V0.11] (C) 2003-2005 H.Poetzl
chcontext is working.
chbind is working.
Linux 2.6.11.5-vs1.9.5 i686/0.30.204/0.30.204 [Ea]
VCI: 0001:0025 273 0316
~~~
