[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Allen D. Parker II) writes:
I'm no programmer, but I do believe, it would be pretty nice if the
owner of a context (fake root user) could halt/reboot *their*
vserver via /sbin/init, /sbin/reboot or /sbin/halt. It'd be nice to
have a way to pass messages *securely* back to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Mayrhuber) writes:
ln -sf '/lib/modules/2.4.22-c17h-xfs/build/include/linux/virtual.h'
'linuxvirtual.h' test -e 'linuxvirtual.h' || \
ln -sf './lib/virtual.h' 'linuxvirtual.h'
...
In file included from lib/syscall_rlimit.c:29:
Hello,
I just released version 0.26 of util-vserver which can be downloaded at
http://savannah.nongnu.org/files/?group=util-vserver
It is mainly a bugfix release; the new items in detail are:
* BUGFIX: uninitialized variables in 'ifspec' were fixed and
error-messages will be given
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bert De Vuyst) writes:
After looking at the code of tool vrpm (part of vserver and util-vserver), I
have some questions.
1. The location of /vservers is hardcoded in this tool.
Not in util-vserver. In stable branch, this value is set at ./configure time.
In alpha branch,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bert De Vuyst) writes:
No, 'vrpm' creates a new context without doing any ip configuration.
OK. I was looking at the vrpm code to see if I could make a
vapt-get utility for debian.
alpha branch has a vapt-get for Red Hat based systems. It runs in
host ctx and calls the
Hello,
on IRC two days ago we had a discussion about secure chroot()
implementation. To make it short: it does not exist a such one.
The details: the problem of current chroot(2) is that this syscall is
not stackable -- on every new chroot(2) invocation the dead zone will be
set to a new value
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Jonathan Sambrook) writes:
http://jonathan.dsvr.co.uk/kernel
Enrico:
Likewise, but I've not looked at your stuff yet... WOuld you be
interested? (Once Savannah gets back up again.)
util-vserver provides a library (libvserver.a) which can be used for
tasks
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Eggert) writes:
dietlibc doesn't define uint64_t if __STRICT_ANSI__ is set, and
-std=c99 defines __STRICT_ANSI__.
Reported several times to [EMAIL PROTECTED] but not fixed yet :(
Btw, same happens with 'inline'.
To compile it, I had to add -U __STRICT_ANSI__ after
Hello,
to finish some pending tasks of this year, I just released version 0.27
of util-vserver. It can be found at an interim place at
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/
When savannah's functionality is recovered entirely, it will be uploaded
to the known page at
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Erik Smit) writes:
Most of my vservers are actually chrooted services (apache/mysqld/etc.)
which don't use runlevels or /sbin/init so I've changed the following in
util-vserver 0.27:
Thx, will be in 0.28; please try the release candidate at
Hello,
I uploaded version 0.28 of util-vserver to
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/
Its changes are
- BUGFIX: fixed context creation when both fakeinit-flag and a
static context is wanted; previous versions ignored the fakeinit
flag in this situation
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Excell) writes:
On Wed, 2004-01-28 at 02:39, Enrico Scholz wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Matthew Excell) writes:
Seems to be the root of all evil... 'ps' (used by vps) and alpha
vserver-stat are accessing (and requiring) /proc/uptime which is not
visibly by default
[ Sorry, last mail went out before being finished; when I would have a
dog I could say my dog went over the keyboard but unfortunately I do
not have a dog and no excuse therefore ]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
I couldn't think of any huge security holes that would create
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (James Noble) writes:
Hello, trying vserver 1.3.6 on fedora, mostly went well, however,
after running newvserver, (all looked like it worked) i tried:
Strange... you are using the alpha branch which should not have
'newvserver' anymore...
FYI, when you have a broadband
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Schultz) writes:
++ /usr/sbin/chbind --silent --ip 10.0.0.244/24 --ip 192.168.2.103/24
/usr/lib/util-vserver/exec-ulimit /etc/vservers/db01/ulimits /usr/sbin/chcontext
--silent --flag lock --flag nproc --cap CAP_NET_RAW --secure --hostname
db01-dev.tpip.net
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Alex Lyashkov) writes:
And chmod obviously fails. Proper fix should probably check exact
inode of /vservers/ dir and protect only this one particular inode.
Proper fix - use separated disknamespace for each vserver.
Do you have working code for that? I already tried
|
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Michael Hilscher) writes:
chmod +t /vservers
exploid dont work anymore. But on the other hand, i cant create a new
vserver anymore:
vserver beta build
cp: cannot create hard link `/vservers/beta/./sbin/e2fsck' to
`/vservers/beta/./sbin/fsck.ext3': Operation not permitted
Hello,
I uploaded version 0.29 of util-vserver to
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/
The changes in this release are minimal and mainly caused by the new
barrier behavior:
- further compilation fixes
- adapted the 'vserver ... build' command to the new barrier
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The /vserver filesystem, where the images reside was mounted as reiserfs.
After changing it to ext2 (or ext3) I can start the vservers without
problems. So it seems like reiserfs doesn't work with the util-vserver
0.26.
Have you tested 0.27 and 0.28 already? Are
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Gray) writes:
We've been using Jacques vserver tools for quite some time, but would
like to move to the util-vserver tools. We can successfully modify
Jacques tools to allow for more than 16 ip addresses, but have not
been successful with the util-vserver tools.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Gray) writes:
We've been using Jacques vserver tools for quite some time, but would
like to move to the util-vserver tools. We can successfully modify
Jacques tools to allow for more than 16 ip addresses, but have not
been
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Winfield) writes:
I am running 2.4.24 vs 1.26 debian. I have installed the tools
util-vserver-0.29.192 and am trying to get the new vunify
running. Have followed the instructions on
http://www.linux-vserver.org/index.php?page=alpha+util-vserver
When I run vunify I get
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
sh -x ./vserver VSLPFRA1 stop:
+ /DBA/users/lang72/UTIL/sbin/chbind --ip 145.228.183.185 --bcast
145.228.205.255 /DBA/users/lang72/UTIL/sbin/chcontext --cap CAP_NET_RAW
--secure --ctx 49153 /DBA/users/lang72/UTIL/lib/util-vserver/capchroot .
/sbin/init 6
ipv4root
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Dan Winfield) writes:
| # vserver foo build -m skeleton --hostname foo --netdev eth0
| --interface 10.1.2.3/20 --context 42
Managed to create a vserver using this command. Used debootstrap.
This put all config into /usr/local/etc/vservers and not /etc/vservers
as
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bodo Eggert) writes:
I observerd the same on SuSE9.0. Therefore, i just used the binaries
built in a Suse8.2 environment hoping that this works as well. So far
it does.
But of course i am interested in a 'clean' solution, i.e. the
vserver-utils compiled with gcc 3.3.1 on
Micah Anderson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This seems to compile ok! However, there are some ANSI warnings at the
beginning.
Just ignore them... util-vserver is C99 (and compiles without warnings
there). Pre-C99 compilers might give some warnings but they should
compile it.
Enrico
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Guettler) writes:
If you use --cap CAP_NET_RAW with chcontext chroot is not possible.
I know about miscompilations with SuSE 9 (gcc 3.3.1). Can you try the
'-O0' flag and see if problem still exists?
- util-vserver-0.29.3/NEWS:
Version 0.30 -- What is it?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas Guettler) writes:
- Introduction at http://dns.solucorp.qc.ca/miscprj/s_context.hc
has some old parts.
- newvserver does not exist (I think you use vserver foo build
now)
You need the -linuxconf subpackage; but it is deprecated.
- Is there a tool
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
vproc was an experimental tool, and should by now be replaced by
setattr (from util-vserver), enrico, please confirm ...
True for alpha branch, false for stable...
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Jung) writes:
Error: /proc must be mounted
...
The System is a debian. Kernel 2.6.3 + vserver patch-2.6.3-vs0.09.diff
Since you are using the experimental kernel patch, you can try the alpha
branch of util-vserver:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes:
http://savannah.nongnu.org/cgi-bin/viewcvs/util-vserver/util-vserver/distrib/misc/vprocunhide-files?rev=HEAD
Would you consider this a pretty safe list of things to be visible in
a vserver?
It is probably too restrictive and removes too
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
did a quick, first impression classification on those
entries, so it is a start, but nothing final, and YMMV
/proc/net/(C)
required at least for firewall- or VPN-setup vservers
-/proc/net/rpc/ (D)
proof-of-concept code
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes:
When compiling util-vserver-0.29.196, I get this:
diet gcc -g -O2 -std=c99 -Wall -pedantic -W -o src/reducecap src/reducecap.o
lib/.libs/libvserver.a
src/reducecap.o(.text+0x1fd): In function `show':
src/reducecap.c:202: undefined
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Liam Helmer) writes:
One possible scenario is the following. I'll work on a patch for
vserver-utils if anyone's interested in this:
Ok, I implemented the first part of your suggestion into util-vserver[1];
for the second one (iptables), I am not sure how to realize it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes:
Given that vserver won't allow you to use iptables, has anyone tried a
solutions where tha iptables command is replaced by a stub command that
talks to a daemon in context 0 to set up tables?
vserver-djinni[1] is such a daemon and it
Hello,
the alpha branch of util-vserver has reached a state where it becomes
usably and a real replacement for the current stable branch[1]. So I am
planning to put it into beta state in the next days (the exact date is
not fixed yet, but it happens in the next days ;)).
When you want to get an
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Vilain) writes:
Allow me to throw mine into the fold, then; these additions let you
have each vserver on a seperate filesystem, whilst still having the
benefits of unification; all changes are in /usr/sbin/vserver:
With new tools you could do this with:
* add a line
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Jaeger) writes:
1.- Not a problem of the utils but of my setup:
I have a setup where the vserver tools are inside a chroot, not on the
plain host. This is because I want to keep woody on the host, but the
alpha tools only compile on sarge/sid.
Hmm, I tested it on
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Christian Jaeger) writes:
Hmm, I tested it on plain woody and it built there. Which errors do
you get?
Well, I had built and installed the .201 version on woody before, but
couldn't use vunify; same thing with .207:
Ah ok, this behavior is expected. Since vunify is linked
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Noèl Köthe) writes:
* tests, tests, tests; especially with the new 2.6 kernel features[2]
would it be helpful to package your beta for Debian and upload it to
experimental?
Yes, but because of some other tasks, the beta will be delayed till next
week.
It only make sense
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Mike Fischer) writes:
I've already got some vservers up and running nicely.
(Kernel 2.4.22, vserver 1.00, utils 0.25)
Mmmh... these are very old version and lots of security leaks have been
fixed in the meantime.
I found Enrico's speech-slides which tell me that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes:
I've been looking at the documentation for the new utils (nice stylesheet,
btw), and it looks like there is a shift from using a single config file
describing a vserver to a hierarchy of files (kinda reminds me of
qmail)...
Just
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roderick A. Anderson) writes:
I justed needed something which is easy parseble by *both* C programs
and shell scripts, and which supports the new features. The old .conf
files support none of these requirements.
The util-vserver commands seem to support the old files. I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Liam Helmer) writes:
I've been playing with the alpha vserver tools, and I'm trying to figure
out how to expand a vservers capabilities. I hacked the previous version
to not pass the --secure flag with a certain commandline option, so that
I could do things like run
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roderick A. Anderson) writes:
There is no upgrade command (yet??). A process could be to create
the metadata with the skeleton method and to do the remaining
actions manually.
The 'vskel' package?
No, with the 'skeleton' method:
| vserver vserver-id build -m skeleton
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roderick A. Anderson) writes:
basically rpm, vrpm and vunify ...
How about perl packages? They are typically not RPM based
'vunify' of alpha util-vserver is not rpm based anymore (although its
metadata can be used to detect non-unifyable files).
vunify will not unify
Hello,
I uploaded a release-candidate for the stable branch to
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/rc/
and plan to make this the next stable version in the next days. Except
for a small EOL fix, this is identically to 0.29.5. Please report every
bug which you find there;
Hello,
my linuxtag papers about vserver are available at
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/doc/lt2004/
Beside the german version, there is a quick-and-dirty english translation
of the presentation slides also. The paper itself is available in german
only.
Enrico
Hello,
as mailman seems to have eat the posting below without any comment, I
will try it again...
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Hello,
as mailman seems to have eat the posting below without any comment, I
will try it again...
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Enrico Scholz) writes:
as mailman seems to have eat the posting below without any comment, I
will try it again...
Ok, I am giving up as mailman seems to be a little bit misconfigured... The
original mail can be found at
http://www.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/mails
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roderick A. Anderson) writes:
vrpm nicn -- -Uvh awstats-6.1-1.1.fc1.dag.noarch.rpm
I get these lines.
Updating server nicn
error: cannot open Packages index using db3 - Permission denied (13)
[You do not tell the util-vserver version, but as you mentioned
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ola Lundqvist) writes:
the flags needed for unification. That's why i said you should
backport setattr from the unstable branch.
I see. Is the setattr from unstable well tested
it works for me
and backwards compatible?
yes regarding core functionality (you can set
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
src/secure-mount.c no defined file sys/param.h, that provide PATH_MAX, and
sources not builded
Thx; but this should not be an issue anymore as new code in CVS does not
use PATH_MAX anymore.
when will it be released as 0.30.191 or so?
0.30.191
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Roderick A. Anderson) writes:
What I came to realise was that vserver-stat only shows the virtual
servers if a service is running.
# vserver-stat
(see nothing but main)
# vserver foo enter
foo# /etc/rc.d/init.d/httpd start
# vserver-stat
(should now list main and
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Henrik Heil) writes:
1) Chroot Barrier Flag
http://www-user.tu-chemnitz.de/~ensc/util-vserver/doc/lt2004/paper.html#fig:rmattack
---8---
Die Anfälligkeit gegen Symlinkattacken und andere Races ist ein
weiterer Nachteil des stable Branches, weshalb vom Einsatz in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Gregory (Grisha) Trubetskoy) writes:
And it looks like utils pass v3 while the kernel treats it as v2 and
so my fill_rate becomes set_mask,
Thanks for the report and the analysis; should be fixed in 0.30.196
Enrico
___
Vserver
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Sam Vilain) writes:
The following patch, to vservers.functions in the util-vserver
distribution, will do something of a `namespace cleanup' in lieu of
the rework to the vserver startup and mount cleanup process that
Enrico has planned (I'm told).
Currently there are two
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Currently there are two conflicting requirements:
(a) 'vserver ... enter' and operating from the outside in the vserver, and
(b) cleaning /proc/mounts
first, I would like to split up (a) into
(a1) 'vserver ... enter' and
(a2) operating from
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Baltasar Cevc) writes:
I want to create a Debian woody package of the current util-vserver
tools. During the packaging process, all files are installed in
.../debian/tmp as a virtual root and then packed together.
The problem now is that make install recreates pathconfig.h
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Reyer) writes:
when I tried to compile util-vserver-0.30.196, i got this error:
src/keep-ctx-alive.c: In function `doit':
src/keep-ctx-alive.c:145: error: `__arr' undeclared (first use in this
function)
...
digging through the various header files I found all
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Glen-Young) writes:
I have noticed someone asking about this when I searched for this error
and it was mentioned that this was fixed in util-vserver-0.30.193
(architecture is never mentioned).
if diet gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I. -I. -I ./lib -I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Adrian Reyer) writes:
as pointed out by Hollow, confirmed by me and workarounded by Bertl,
vsched with hard limits segfaults after setting the values. by ading
'-- true' to the command line, it stops segfaulting while continue
working correctly.
Sorry, can not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kilian Krause) writes:
| * /etc/vserver/util-vserver-vars
Please do not install 'util-vserver-vars' into /etc.
...
Yet the option to allow a relocation of the default vserver rootdir
would be highly appreciated. (and IMHO broken if not availble at all)
The default
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
| * pkglibdir is /usr/lib/util-vserver instead of /var/lib/util-vserver
??? this is standard in autoconf packages.
I was wondering a bit about this myself.. The difference between
/usr/lib and /var/lib is pretty clear- is there stuff in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
As there is some discussion about the package-count let me explain the
background of the packaging:
|- How should the packaging devide up the groups most conveniently?
util-vserver-core-0.30.196
Contains low-level utilities which use the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
Alright, then maybe a -legacy or some such package, or just a really
stern warning at the start of all the -legacy stuff saying this is
legacy, you shouldn't be using it, or just don't distribute it at all
(my personal favorite).
the thing is,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
and that it perhaps shouldn't even be packaged at all
No, things like $PACKAGE_VERSION are changing with every version and
must be told to the single scripts. Same holds for the configured paths.
So, it's used by scripts *and* is compiled into
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
[... absolute paths vs. resolution with $PATH ...]
using execvp(3) would mean:
* trusting in $PATH that it contains the wanted path (this has to deal
with packaging philosophies also which expect all 3rd party apps
under /opt/name) --
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kilian Krause) writes:
[ ... util-vserver.spec ...]
Hrmpf. Then can we just not delete it in make clean?
I will think about this; but I still do not understand the problem
there.
very easy to tell. You're talking about what configure builds, make
clean purges yet
Hans Ulrich Niedermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
fix typo in $_MKTEMPDIR: Use $_MKTEMP not $MKTEMP
thx, fixed in CVS
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
http://list.linux-vserver.org/mailman/listinfo/vserver
Hans Ulrich Niedermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What they fix:
* handle a version number like 0.27-7
Can you check if CVS ([1]) fixes your problem?
It does not.
For _dietlibc_ver_min=27-7, the line
_dietlibc_ver_min=${_dietlibc_ver_min%%[!0-9]*}
doesn't do what it is supposed to
Hans Ulrich Niedermann [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For _dietlibc_ver_min=27-7, the line
_dietlibc_ver_min=${_dietlibc_ver_min%%[!0-9]*}
doesn't do what it is supposed to do.
What do you expect there?
| $ _dietlibc_ver_min=27-7
| $ echo ${_dietlibc_ver_min%%[!0-9]*}
| 27
seems to be
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andrew Mendelsohn) writes:
Here is the Debug output. There is no corresponding line for bcap, as
++ OPTS_VATTRIBUTE=([EMAIL PROTECTED] --ccap $cap) for ccap.
...
++ local f=/etc/vservers/apache2server/bcapabilities
++ test -e /etc/vservers/apache2server/bcapabilities
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
after a decent debug session we now know that the vshelper reboot
functionality is broken with 0.30.196 on vs1.2.10 (I suspect on older
versions too) ...
the culprit seems to be vserver-info, which, for whatever reason, is
not able to 'reverse' the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Herbert Poetzl) writes:
after a decent debug session we now know that the vshelper reboot
functionality is broken with 0.30.196 on vs1.2.10 (I suspect on older
versions too) ...
the culprit seems to be vserver-info, which, for whatever reason, is
not able to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes:
A small bug report and a feature request:
1. vserver --help shows me:
running ... succeeds iff the vserver is running
-^^^ should only be one f :)
Really? It is meant as
| From The Free On-line Dictionary of Computing
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes:
Then I followed the instructions on
http://linux-vserver.org/alpha+util-vserver to unify vservers:
1. mkdir -p /usr/local/etc/vservers/MT/apps/vunify
2. ln -s /usr/local/etc/vservers/seedbank
/usr/local/etc/vservers/MT/apps/vunify/refserver.00
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Micah Anderson) writes:
|* make a 'clone' build method
|
|which allows to clone an existing vserver (with modified options)
I would like to have a generic CLI tool which modifies the
configuration, before I implement this method. 'vcopy' needs
testing also;
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Velu Erwan) writes:
I do not know if urpmi supports this, but it should be possible to
specify the version of Mandrake Linux. E.g.
| vserver ... build -m urpmi -- -d mdk10
Of course it could be done, but the main idea was to install the
vserver using the virtual
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Velu Erwan) writes:
I have to admit that I do not know anything about 'urpmi', but with
'yum' and 'apt' I can configure the repository which is going to be
used. This makes it possible to install FC2 guests on FC3 hosts by using
'... -d fc2'.
In urpmi you can choose the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
I´ve build a fc2 vserver and I can start it and enter it but I can´t
stop it.
This error comes or it dont go on (i think it can´t shutdown that
interface) But why ??:
mmh... the network initscripts should have been disabled by
'vserver ... build' (the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
this error comes wehen I want to build a fc3 vserver!
...
2:filesystem
### [ 29%]
Fehler: unpacking of archive failed on file /usr/bin/X11;422ffd85:
cpio: symlink failed - No such file or directory
I was
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
where can i change that ??
Can not find a vserver-setup at '/usr/local/etc/vservers//'.
See README for the ./configure options which create expected
paths.
Enrico
pgpVWwiaozYHy.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
I´ve a FedoraCore3 vserver and I wanna change the password for an
user and then ...
passwd test
passwd: root:system_r:unconfined_t is not authorized to change the
password of test
Disable SELinux. Its kernel API (/proc/self/attr + /selinux)
makes it
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Mueller) writes:
But just for my understanding: What is this -initpre- and
whydoes it work now?
This is a script which will be executed before unpackaging the
files. It works because it workarounds
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52725
There
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Mueller) writes:
Can I here:
/usr/src/redhat/BUILD/util-vserver-0.30.204/distrib/fc3/apt/rpmpriorities
Configure what packages been installed when I build a new vserver?
Or what stand this (rpmpriorities) for?
That's a configuration file for apt. It is used by
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Timo Müller) writes:
hmm
how can I disable selinux?
http://fedora.redhat.com/docs/selinux-faq-fc3/index.html#id2825880
Enrico
___
Vserver mailing list
Vserver@list.linux-vserver.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Olivier Poitrey) writes:
what about LYCOS? They are using vserver and get much money with
it. They also provide Internet-Access.
Here a link for the german readers:
http://www.lycos.de/startseite/online/internetzugang.html
Should Enrico ask them for some money to stay
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul S. Gumerman) writes:
Where can I find this?
Sorry, please use the
http://www.nongnu.org/util-vserver/
homepage or the savannah projectpage
https://savannah.nongnu.org/projects/util-vserver/
Enrico
pgpg07da9qMcN.pgp
Description: PGP signature
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Paul S. Gumerman) writes:
Ran vserver fc3-reference hashify, which ran ok with one message
(sorry, can't recall it now).
The exact message would be helpful perhaps.
Then tried vserver loco-reference hashify which failed with a
message saying vserver ... suexec is support
Hello,
I discovered some irregularities regarding fakeinit functionality. The
following program gives different output on host and vservers:
| int main(int argc, char *argv[])
| {
| printf(%i\n, getsid(atoi(argv[1])));
| }
On host:
| # ./a.out 1
| 0
on VServer:
| # chcontext --xid 100
Kevin Pendleton [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I try to use the vserver build -m apt-rpm function to create a fc3
vserver on a centos host with util-vserver-0.30.205, I get the following
output:
vserver base-fc3 build -m apt-rpm --hostname domain.com --interface
domain=eth0:192.168.0.129/24
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Kevin Pendleton) writes:
When you try to use the vserver build -m copy function it requires a
file that does not exist.
Yes, this is expected because this method is not implemented yet. Sorry,
I should remove it from the help text
Enrico
pgptFzisI6GK1.pgp
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
no, thanks I already figured it, the dietlibc needs
patching as the syscall(2) for x86_64 isn't implemented
.o( I wonder _what_ is running on your machine ;)
I guess it was using _syscall3() instead of syscall(). Shouldn't it?
yes, after I
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
according to Enrico (please confirm or correct) the glibc
has issues with the fake name resolver and is generally
considered insecure because usually dynamically linked ...
This really needs further explanation and justification. What about
Herbert Poetzl [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
just tried to 'update' my rpms to the latest release of util-vserver
for testing (0.30.206) but it seems that this version will need some
time to become usable, no?
checking whether to enable dietlibc... no (too old; 0.29+ required, 0.28
found)
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Stephen Frost) writes:
That's not possible. During the extraction phase, 'rpm' has to do
an username - uid mapping with the setup from the inside of the
chroot. So at least there, I need getpwname() after chroot().
Sorry for the double-reply but additionally, is that the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Marcel de Riedmatten) writes:
I am playing with with the new debian package util-vserver 0.30.204-5,
thanks to Ola for that. I dont want some vserver to be started
automaticaly at startup so i don't put the default mark for that one.
But when i shutdown the machine and this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ola Lundqvist) writes:
lib_internal/unify-copy.c: In function `copyMMap':
lib_internal/unify-copy.c:142: error: `MADV_SEQUENTIAL' undeclared (first use
in this function)
mmh... a dietlibc issue
1 - 100 of 171 matches
Mail list logo
