Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP

2008-01-22 Thread Justin Fletcher
What are the destination addresses that are being forwarded? Broadcasts shouldn't be forwarded, but the router needs to know that they're broadcast addresses. It'll only recognize 10.1.255.255 and 10.2.255.255 as broadcast addresses. If a system is sending requests to, say, 10.1.12.255 where a

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions

2008-01-14 Thread Dave Roberts
13, 2008 9:39 PM To: Marat Nepomnyashy Cc: vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions From the dhcpd.conf (5) man page: quote The DHCP server generates the list of available IP addresses from a hash table. This means that the addresses are not sorted in any

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions

2008-01-14 Thread silvertip257
*To:* Stig Thormodsrud *Subject:* Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions What should I call my connection to my residential ISP? To me it's a WAN connection [I could be wrong] and I need dhclient running on eth0 to successfully obtain an address without ticking off my ISP (sure I can statically

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions

2008-01-13 Thread Marat Nepomnyashy
: silvertip257 To: Marat Nepomnyashy ; vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:54 PM Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions Why cannot I take addresses out of the beginning of the block like I'd rather it do? How can I (without rewriting/modifying source code

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions

2008-01-13 Thread Stig Thormodsrud
] On Behalf Of silvertip257 Sent: Sunday, January 13, 2008 6:55 PM To: Marat Nepomnyashy; vyatta-users@mailman.vyatta.com Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP pool questions Why cannot I take addresses out of the beginning of the block like I'd rather it do? How can I (without rewriting/modifying source code

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP relay

2007-12-06 Thread Dams
Thanks for your reply. Sorry, my mistake : not eth1 but eth0. (192.168.10.X) Eth2 - network with the DHCP Server on network 192.168.2.XXx The DHCP serve the scope (192.168.2.0) as well : here no problem the pc got their IP (see the log, after) and I would like that the DHCP server serve the

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP relay

2007-12-06 Thread Dams
Thanks Robyn, My config Internet - Untangle -- Switch and plug on the switch Vyatta Router, the network 192.168.2.0, and the DHCP Server Schema: X - Vyatta -- Network 192.168.10.0 Internet --- Untangle Gateway --- Switch

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP relay

2007-12-06 Thread Robyn Orosz
Hi Damien, Thanks for the extra info. I think the problem may be due to your masquerade rules. Rule 1 is masquerading all traffic that leaves eth2. So, anything with a source address of 192.168.10.x will be changed to a source address of 192.168.2.10. Rule 2 looks like it's basically

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP relay in vif interfaces (vc3)

2007-11-16 Thread Sergio Garcia
Thanks Marat, I will try it asap. Marat Nepomnyashy wrote: Hi Sergio, There is a limitation in the VC3 release in that only 'ethX' values can be specified for DHCP relay interfaces. This is due to overly stringent validation checks. I just opened a new bug on this:

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP relay in vif interfaces (vc3)

2007-11-14 Thread Marat Nepomnyashy
Hi Sergio, There is a limitation in the VC3 release in that only 'ethX' values can be specified for DHCP relay interfaces. This is due to overly stringent validation checks. I just opened a new bug on this: https://bugzilla.vyatta.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2473 A temporary work-around can be

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP/NAT/Firewall rules

2007-10-04 Thread Tony Cratz
Allan Leinwand wrote: Hi Tony, I believe that the established keyword should only allow connections from the Internet back into your network that have the TCP SYN ACK flags set. So, if I understand your DNAT rules correctly, it would only allow TCP SYN ACK packets back into your network

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP/NAT/Firewall rules

2007-10-02 Thread An-Cheng Huang
Hi Tony, You should be able to put the allowed ports in the destination port-number/portname fields in the DNAT rule. This way, only packets with those destination ports will be DNATed and be able to access the 10.1.1.2 server. An-Cheng Tony Cratz wrote: I have set-up my OFR to use

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP/NAT/Firewall rules

2007-10-02 Thread Tony Cratz
An-Cheng Huang wrote: Hi Tony, You should be able to put the allowed ports in the destination port-number/portname fields in the DNAT rule. This way, only packets with those destination ports will be DNATed and be able to access the 10.1.1.2 server. An-Cheng Tony Cratz wrote: I

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP/NAT/Firewall rules

2007-10-02 Thread Allan Leinwand
Of Tony Cratz Sent: Tuesday, October 02, 2007 2:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP/NAT/Firewall rules An-Cheng Huang wrote: Hi Tony, You should be able to put the allowed ports in the destination port-number/portname fields in the DNAT rule. This way, only packets

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP: not configured to listen on any interfaces!

2007-09-04 Thread Troopy .
Hello, Concerning the message not configured to listen on any interfaces! i configure an IP address on an interface and it's working now But i still don't see the exclude command. Thanks Troopy -- Original Message -- From: Troopy . [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [Vyatta-users] DHCP ip address on ethernet interface

2007-08-28 Thread Dave Roberts
Hello Vyatta, I found vyatta for a few days and i installed it successfully on my box. It runs all fine and i updated it to the latest state. But i have a simple question, it ist possible to recive a dynamic ip from an dhcp server on an vyatta ethernet interface ? i didnt find a