On Mon, 2004-04-12 at 23:34, BART RAFFAELE wrote:
--
From: BART RAFFAELE [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 02 Apr 2004 16:51:47 +0800
To: WAMUG Mailing List wamug@wamug.org.au
Subject: Test please ignore!
While I completely understand your need to test your email and perhaps
to a lesser
On 13/04/2004, at 4:18 AM, Onno Benschop wrote:
..let the flames begin..
OK. I'll bite! Congratulations! Your response, all about the cost of
email traffic to mailing lists, was absolutely breathtaking in its
irony.
Someone sends a couple of innocent (your quotes, not mine) test
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 10:48, Peter Hinchliffe wrote:
On 13/04/2004, at 4:18 AM, Onno Benschop wrote:
..let the flames begin..
OK. I'll bite! Congratulations! Your response, all about the cost of
email traffic to mailing lists, was absolutely breathtaking in its
irony.
Noted. As soon
Although I am not concerned with the cost of email traffic, I agree
with Onno's opinion of test messages. One test message I can happily
ignore but multiple messages is going much too far. This is not the
first instance of such multiple test messages and
subscribers/potential subscribers
Hi all
In the case of muliti messages i'm gulit of as well(sorry) .
There was are problem with the return server if you checked the date i sent
the email test on the 2nd of April and didn't get a reply until 12th of
April.
Hence the multi messages
But hey!
I'm not offended but I've heard it
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 14:04, BART RAFFAELE wrote:
There was are problem with the return server if you checked the date i sent
the email test on the 2nd of April and didn't get a reply until 12th of
April.
I did check the date and all of them show that they were sent from the
WAMUG server on
On 13/04/2004, at 12:20 PM, Onno Benschop wrote:
On Tue, 2004-04-13 at 14:04, BART RAFFAELE wrote:
There was are problem with the return server if you checked the date
i sent
the email test on the 2nd of April and didn't get a reply until 12th
of
April.
I did check the date and all of
On 13/4/04 12:34 PM, Matthew Healey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A much better approach would have been to send a message to the
list-manager, or even one to the list stating: My mail isn't getting
through. or to another member: My mail isn't getting through, can you
please forward this request
On 13/04/2004, at 12:54 PM, Rod wrote:
On 13/4/04 12:34 PM, Matthew Healey [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
A much better approach would have been to send a message to the
list-manager, or even one to the list stating: My mail isn't getting
through. or to another member: My mail isn't getting
9 matches
Mail list logo
