#76: r6071 - patch for bad initializers in src/projectile.c
--+-
Reporter: stiv |Type: defect
Status: new|Priority: major
Milestone: | Component: other
#77: Anti-aliased full-sized recolored cursors
--+-
Reporter: Zarel |Type: enhancement
Status: new|Priority: major
Milestone: 2.1| Component: Data: Art
Dennis Schridde schreef:
I'd like to hear your opinions, ideas, insights.
Maybe you've got a different/better idea how to prevent long times of silence
between releases?
Quick short: I'd rather release early and often (with some bugs) than
less often with less frequent testing.
--
Per Inge Mathisen schreef:
On Mon, Sep 22, 2008 at 6:08 PM, Freddie Witherden
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I still think that SQLite is the way to go, so far as future proofing
goes. Going straight to tagfile makes it a lot harder to go to SQLite
later on (two converters needed etc.). The
bugs buggy schreef:
On 9/22/08, Freddie Witherden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a good use of developer time -- which could be better
spent on 2.2 -- ensuring that we never get into this situation again.
This about sums it up.
Developer time is short, so we need to do what will be
Hi Giel,
On 24 Sep 2008, at 23:52, Giel van Schijndel wrote:
Not supporting trunk savegames with 2.1_beta5 should IMO be *no*
problem
(i.e. no need to have forward compatibility). As for 2.1_beta4
savegames, what's the worst that could happen? People not upgrading to
2.1_beta5 (and
On 9/23/08, Per Inge Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
One idea: How about using just one repository, but shaped like this:
trunk/
branches/
tags/
then a next level (example from inside trunk):
trunk/code/
trunk/data/
trunk/originals/
so if you wanted to download the latest of all,
2008/9/24 bugs buggy [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
We got windows builds available nightly.
We should use that to our advantage, and let the community test.
I don't know how we will handle mac builds though. It doesn't look like we
will have nightly builds with them. But 2 out of the 3 platforms we
On 9/24/08, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
bugs buggy schreef:
On 9/22/08, Freddie Witherden [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is not a good use of developer time -- which could be better
spent on 2.2 -- ensuring that we never get into this situation again.
This about sums it
On 9/24/08, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
IMO releasing 2.1 would only offer people a choice, and as long as we're
clear on what we won't support I don't think we should face any serious
trouble from 2.1.
Ok, lets do it.
Release 2.1 beta 5.
Release 2.2 alpha / beta 1.
Let
10 matches
Mail list logo
