On 4/11/10, Guangcong Luo wrote:
Anyway, w.r.t. to our future, I have a new idea: We branch 2.4 right
before merging in Qt and newnet. Trunk is reasonably stable, and the
last time we branched trunk was over a year ago. Getting current trunk
to stable should be a reasonably fast process,
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:28 PM, buginator buginato...@gmail.com wrote:
That would work for me, though, I don't think we should name it 2.4.
We need to reserve the other 2.4-2.9 for *possible* enhancements to 2.3.
Newnet, Qt, lua come to mind...
I would rather see a branch called 3.0, so we
On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 1:36 PM, buginator buginato...@gmail.com wrote:
On the release of 2.3, I recommend we have a transition period for the
lobby server that will tell 2.2.x clients to upgrade to 2.3 ASAP, then
after 2-3 weeks or so, we just echo the message of 'Update to 2.3' and
close the
