#1767: Selftest Crashing
+---
Reporter: evox |Type: bug
Status: new |Priority: major
Milestone: unspecified | Component: other
Version: 2.3 beta 13 |
On Tuesday, 13 April 2010 at 22:14, buginator wrote:
Barring any other showstopping bugs, or objections, I think we should
tag 2.3 RC1a late Friday night or early Saturday morning to get this
out to as many of our current testers as possible before they start
their weekend gaming sessions.
On Tuesday, 13 April 2010 at 22:14, buginator wrote:
Barring any other showstopping bugs, or objections, I think we should
tag 2.3 RC1a late Friday night or early Saturday morning to get this
out to as many of our current testers as possible before they start
their weekend gaming sessions.
I was adding a version check to the lobby, to inform users that a new
client is available.
The question I have is, currently we (ab)use the version string to
include mod information.
ie: 2.3 svn becomes 2.3 svn, mod:blah blah blah
(1)If we still want to go with what is currently done, then it is
On 4/11/10, Guangcong Luo wrote:
Anyway, w.r.t. to our future, I have a new idea: We branch 2.4 right
before merging in Qt and newnet. Trunk is reasonably stable, and the
last time we branched trunk was over a year ago. Getting current trunk
to stable should be a reasonably fast process,
On 4/14/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
I've got the Playstation music track now (in its original 37800 Hz), and could
add the Vorbis version (upsampled to 44100 Hz of course) to the music folder.
Any objections?
I personally have no objections, but the PSX stuff is all in that gray
area of legal
On 4/14/10, Christian Ohm wrote:
http://developer.wz2100.net/ticket/251
If we can find a nice way to test if we're loading a game (game time if that
works, or something else), this should be included I tink.
Anyone got some good savegames we can test this patch with?
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:23 PM, buginator buginato...@gmail.com wrote:
(1)If we still want to go with what is currently done, then it is
possible to use a delimiter to strip off the ,mod: blah blah part,
and in this case, the delimiter would be ,.
(2)If we go the other way, then when we
On Wed, Apr 14, 2010 at 8:28 PM, buginator buginato...@gmail.com wrote:
That would work for me, though, I don't think we should name it 2.4.
We need to reserve the other 2.4-2.9 for *possible* enhancements to 2.3.
Newnet, Qt, lua come to mind...
I would rather see a branch called 3.0, so we
