Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-11-06 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Dennis Schridde schreef: Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 07:23:06 schrieb bugs buggy: Also, I think we should do a Release Candidate of 2.1, just in case we missed something. Good idea. (This is just the current 2.1 branch, no need to create a new RC tag or anything right? ) Please do

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-23 Thread Dennis Schridde
Hi! Am Donnerstag, 23. Oktober 2008 07:23:06 schrieb bugs buggy: Also, I think we should do a Release Candidate of 2.1, just in case we missed something. Good idea. (This is just the current 2.1 branch, no need to create a new RC tag or anything right? ) Please do create a tag of everything

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-21 Thread Zarel
On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 5:38 AM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Zarel schreef: They're pulse lasers (range 16) attacking something in range 11. I'd say that's not intended. That being said, I think most users, given the choice between no multi-turrets at all, or half-decent

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-20 Thread Dennis Schridde
Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 01:09:50 schrieb Zarel: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only reason for not including/enabling this would be that it looks bad right? If that's the case I'd say: add a config option to disable it and let people

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-20 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Zarel schreef: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 3:26 AM, Dennis Schridde [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Montag, 20. Oktober 2008 01:09:50 schrieb Zarel: On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only reason for not including/enabling this would be that it looks

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-20 Thread bugs buggy
On 10/20/08, Per Inge Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: That being said, I think most users, given the choice between no multi-turrets at all, or half-decent working multi-turrets they'd probably go for the

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-20 Thread Giel van Schijndel
bugs buggy schreef: On 10/20/08, Per Inge Mathisen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Mon, Oct 20, 2008 at 12:38 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: and give the users a choice. Users only want a choice until given a choice, then they want it to work. Besides, in my experience, making

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-19 Thread Giel van Schijndel
Elio Gubser schreef: The issues that must be done still: *Disable multi-turret support. hmm, people (at least me) really love that feature and would hazard the consequences (imo and what i've read in the forums) The only reason for not including/enabling this would be that it looks bad

Re: [Warzone-dev] Pushing 2.1 out the door

2008-10-19 Thread Zarel
On Sun, Oct 19, 2008 at 5:01 PM, Giel van Schijndel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: The only reason for not including/enabling this would be that it looks bad right? If that's the case I'd say: add a config option to disable it and let people decide for themselves. No, ordering is also broken -