I definitely agree that federation needs to be part of 1.0 since that has
been a big part of the advertising, and the whole point of Wave is to
replace email, which works that way, in collaboration.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'm really pleased to
All,
I have made significant enhancements to the issue export script which should
allow us to move the issues over. Here is what I did
The id was shortened to simply the issue Id number from the url.
The columns were re-ordered and renamed to line up with how Jira typically
orders them.
The
Great Michael!
Please let me know if you think I can assist with the Jira move.
Yuri
2011/4/23 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
All,
I have made significant enhancements to the issue export script which
should allow us to move the issues over. Here is what I did
The id was
Ok, I ll try to do this.
2011/4/23 Michael MacFadden michael.macfad...@gmail.com
It would be good if some one could run the export script and take a look at
the CSV to see if there are any glaring mistakes. Thanks.
~Michael
On Apr 23, 2011, at 10:28 AM, Yuri Z wrote:
Great Michael!
Issue freeze would be a good idea. Is there anything that cannot be
migrated?
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 1:49 PM, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com wrote:
All,
I would like to recommend we cut over from Google Code to Jira with in the
next few days. Once the CSV export is
I think everything is going to make it over, with the exception of attachments.
But that doesn't seem to be much of an issue (no pun intended).
~Michael
On Apr 23, 2011, at 11:45 AM, Arlen Beiler arlen...@gmail.com wrote:
Issue freeze would be a good idea. Is there anything that cannot be
Thanks for your support on Federation and PyOfWave. Once I get it
working as a server, I'll look into some other niceties like the
location.
With that said, I'm not clear on how to send deltas via Federation. Can
anyone help?
--
alci...@eml.cc
On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:16 -0400, Arlen Beiler
I support this.
Without federation wave is just a wiki; it can't be missing from 1.0.
~
Doug.
On Fri, Apr 22, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Thomas Wrobel darkfl...@gmail.com wrote:
I'd say Federartion is needed for a 1.0 release as its one of the main
points of wave existing to start with and 1.0 implies
I've already discussed this, but as the manager of a 3rd party server, I
support Federation. It can't be missing.
I just wanted this on this thread.
--
alci...@eml.cc
On Sun, 24 Apr 2011 07:26 +0800, Doug douglas.lin...@gmail.com
wrote:
I support this.
Without federation wave is just a
