I definitely agree that federation needs to be part of 1.0 since that has been a big part of the advertising, and the whole point of Wave is to replace email, which works that way, in collaboration.
On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> wrote: > I'm really pleased to see Pygo survive in some form - it was way ahead > of google (and even wiab) in terms of its client connection protocol. > At one point we had a nice little googlemap app with multiple people > logged into the same wave seeing location updates on different clients > - all within 2 seconds or so and working via pygowaves server. > We still have the old video up here; > > http://arwave.org/pages/Videos.php > (lowest vid) > > Hopeful Wiab and Pyfo wave will get a similar protocol so we can > resume development on the project. > -Thomas > > ~~~~~~ > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > www.rateoholic.co.uk > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > On 23 April 2011 11:54, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > oh right Patrick passed the reins on. > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> > > To: [email protected] > > Sent: Sat, 23 April, 2011 6:08:43 > > Subject: Re: Federation, multiple servers > > > > It's at an early stage at the moment, but progressing well and gaining > > support. It's all new people now. > > -- > > [email protected] > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:04 +0100, "Paul Thomas" <[email protected]> > > wrote: > >> I was wondering how the rewrite of pygowave was going > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> ________________________________ > >> From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> > >> To: [email protected] > >> Sent: Fri, 22 April, 2011 21:44:25 > >> Subject: Federation, multiple servers > >> > >> hello there, > >> I am the manager of PyOfWave (https://github.com/alcinnz/PyOfWave/), > the > >> successor of PyGoWave. > >> > >> I hear you have been discussing whether the federation protocol is worth > >> putting in version 1.0, and as a 3rd party server, I'd give you a > >> defiant "yes, it is worth it." > >> > >> Also, I would like to suggest that we get a better standards system, as > >> I see the existing one as being very poor at the moment. I'd like to see > >> it using Wave, and a limited federation server (so as not to sure > >> favoritism), but any results on that would come from discussion. > >> > >> Thank you for your consideration. > >> -- > >> [email protected] > >> > >> -- > >> http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > >> love email again > > > > -- > > http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > > love email again >
