Thanks for your support on Federation and PyOfWave. Once I get it working as a server, I'll look into some other niceties like the location.
With that said, I'm not clear on how to send deltas via Federation. Can anyone help? -- [email protected] On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 10:16 -0400, "Arlen Beiler" <[email protected]> wrote: > I definitely agree that federation needs to be part of 1.0 since that has > been a big part of the advertising, and the whole point of Wave is to > replace email, which works that way, in collaboration. > > On Sat, Apr 23, 2011 at 9:16 AM, Thomas Wrobel <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > I'm really pleased to see Pygo survive in some form - it was way ahead > > of google (and even wiab) in terms of its client connection protocol. > > At one point we had a nice little googlemap app with multiple people > > logged into the same wave seeing location updates on different clients > > - all within 2 seconds or so and working via pygowaves server. > > We still have the old video up here; > > > > http://arwave.org/pages/Videos.php > > (lowest vid) > > > > Hopeful Wiab and Pyfo wave will get a similar protocol so we can > > resume development on the project. > > -Thomas > > > > ~~~~~~ > > Reviews of anything, by anyone; > > www.rateoholic.co.uk > > Please try out my new site and give feedback :) > > > > > > > > On 23 April 2011 11:54, Paul Thomas <[email protected]> wrote: > > > oh right Patrick passed the reins on. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ________________________________ > > > From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> > > > To: [email protected] > > > Sent: Sat, 23 April, 2011 6:08:43 > > > Subject: Re: Federation, multiple servers > > > > > > It's at an early stage at the moment, but progressing well and gaining > > > support. It's all new people now. > > > -- > > > [email protected] > > > > > > > > > On Sat, 23 Apr 2011 06:04 +0100, "Paul Thomas" <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > >> I was wondering how the rewrite of pygowave was going > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> ________________________________ > > >> From: Adrian Cochrane <[email protected]> > > >> To: [email protected] > > >> Sent: Fri, 22 April, 2011 21:44:25 > > >> Subject: Federation, multiple servers > > >> > > >> hello there, > > >> I am the manager of PyOfWave (https://github.com/alcinnz/PyOfWave/), > > the > > >> successor of PyGoWave. > > >> > > >> I hear you have been discussing whether the federation protocol is worth > > >> putting in version 1.0, and as a 3rd party server, I'd give you a > > >> defiant "yes, it is worth it." > > >> > > >> Also, I would like to suggest that we get a better standards system, as > > >> I see the existing one as being very poor at the moment. I'd like to see > > >> it using Wave, and a limited federation server (so as not to sure > > >> favoritism), but any results on that would come from discussion. > > >> > > >> Thank you for your consideration. > > >> -- > > >> [email protected] > > >> > > >> -- > > >> http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > > >> love email again > > > > > > -- > > > http://www.fastmail.fm - Or how I learned to stop worrying and > > > love email again > > > -- http://www.fastmail.fm - Faster than the air-speed velocity of an unladen european swallow
