Re: "How not to replace email" - Google Wave lessons learned

https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wave-protocol On Sun, Feb 18, 2018 at 4:31 PM Andreas Kotes wrote: > https://jamey.thesharps.us/2018/02/16/how-not-to-replace-email/ > > thoughtful. > > btw, where's the correct mailinglist right now? > > count > > -- >

Re: [NOTICE] Wave is Retired - What's next?

to other platform and > update > the content :S > > 2018-02-02 10:28 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>: > > > Yeah, I added you to the managers of the discussion group, regarding > the > > waveprotocol.org that is a google site - I have no clue if I

Retiring Apache Wave

Hello The Apache Wave project was retired. This means all mailing lists including this one will be turned off soon. I re-created the old wave-protocol forum at https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wave-protocol Please, join us there for all future discussions regarding the Wave project.

Re: [NOTICE] Wave is Retired - What's next?

re. First discussion in the > new group could be whether to move the site to other platform and update > the content :S > > 2018-02-02 10:28 GMT+01:00 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>: > > > Yeah, I added you to the managers of the discussion group, regarding the > > wavep

Re: [NOTICE] Wave is Retired - What's next?

u want me to admin the group > too? > > > El 1 feb. 2018 5:49 p. m., Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> escribió: > > I still have admin access to http://www.waveprotocol.org/, however, it > looks like the old discussion group was deleted by Google. I recreated it > from scratc

Re: [NOTICE] Wave is Retired - What's next?

I still have admin access to http://www.waveprotocol.org/, however, it looks like the old discussion group was deleted by Google. I recreated it from scratch. So, we can try to re-use it. https://groups.google.com/forum/#!forum/wave-protocol On Thu, Feb 1, 2018 at 5:35 PM Upayavira

Re: [VOTE] Retire Wave

+1 On Mon, Jan 1, 2018 at 11:51 PM, Upayavira wrote: > Wave is currently in the Apache Incubator, which has expectations of how a > project matures. Wave, being a small project, over its seven years of > incubation, is not showing signs of reaching graduation. Thus, it seems >

Re: Resigning as mentor: what next?

t, code repo, and documentation > will be, and ensure we can update waveprotocol.org with those details. > > Zachary Yaro > > On 29 November 2017 at 04:41, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > So, if we have a consensus, I will send the retirement vote email in a > few

Re: Resigning as mentor: what next?

So, if we have a consensus, I will send the retirement vote email in a few days. On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yeah, I think I still have admin permissions for waveprotocol.org > I can add you as admin in can you want to start working on it.

Re: Resigning as mentor: what next?

Yeah, I think I still have admin permissions for waveprotocol.org I can add you as admin in can you want to start working on it. On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:53 PM Zachary Yaro wrote: > Just so I understand, what would be the criteria for the project rejoining > the Apache

Re: Resigning as mentor: what next?

Ok, I agree. Can you elaborate regarding retirement plan? On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 4:14 PM, John D. Ament wrote: > Unfortunately, I have to agree that it's likely time for the podling to > retire. I believe we've reviewed all necessary internally and there would > be

Re: Link to demo server in About... page

No, this demo server is not active. I ll remove the link. I am not aware of any active demo server. Sorry. On Wed, Oct 4, 2017 at 1:33 AM Pablo Di Noto wrote: > Hello, > > Just wanted to point out that the About page at > https://incubator.apache.org/wave/about.html has a link

Re: [Incubator Wiki] Update of "September2017" by YuriZ

OK, I ll try to fix. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 8:57 PM John D. Ament wrote: > Yuri, > > Can you fix the report? Looks like you created a bunch of conflicts. > > John > > On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 1:47 PM Apache Wiki wrote: > > > Dear Wiki user, > > > >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2017

I updated the Wiki with base details. Please feel free to update. On Wed, Sep 6, 2017 at 4:40 AM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to >

Re: Peer review: Make login page more user friendly.

I take look - it does look more modern, but it is hard to judge for me as I am not a UI expert. Can you maybe explain a bit your considerations behind the change? On Sat, Jul 29, 2017 at 2:38 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Peter > Thanks! I ll take a look. > Recen

Re: Peer review: Make login page more user friendly.

Hi Peter Thanks! I ll take a look. Recently we switched to GitHub pull requests instead of Review Board to manage the changes. Would you like to create a PR for out GitHub mirror repo? https://github.com/apache/incubator-wave On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 8:56 PM Peter Warrington

Re: Bumping to v0.5

Sounds good to me On Sat, Jul 1, 2017 at 11:49 PM Upayavira wrote: > Right, so fork a 0.4 branch so that master can head towards a 0.5 > release. Sounds good. > > On Sat, 1 Jul 2017, at 01:40 PM, Evan Hughes wrote: > > Well ATM we don't have a specific branch situation, so

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

T+02:00 Pablo Ojanguren <pablo...@gmail.com>: > > > I had scheduled to write a draft this afternoon. Thanks Yuri. > > > > 2017-06-05 9:45 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>: > > > >> I ll prepare the report, unless there's someone else who volun

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

I ll prepare the report, unless there's someone else who volunteers. On Mon, Jun 5, 2017 at 12:19 AM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - June 2017

Ok, anyone who volunteers to fill in the report? On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 1:00 PM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your quarterly

Re: Critical Bug in Client Server protocol implementation

Yeah, I think it is an old one. In WiabPro they totally rewritten this part of client-server. On Sun, Apr 30, 2017 at 10:50 PM Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > Hi all, > > During user testing in SwellRT/JetPad I ran into a blocker bug. I've > already open the issue [1]. It can be

Re: Docker image for Apache Wave?

Ok, cool. Let me know what are the issues. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:55 AM Ali Nabavi <a...@alijnabavi.info> wrote: > Hey, Yuri. > > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 4:44 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Yeah, we still work on this. > > > > That's goo

Re: Docker image for Apache Wave?

I ll make an effort to make an updated image soon. On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:48 AM sophia parafina wrote: > There’s a year old image on dockerhub with the Dockerfile > https://hub.docker.com/r/maccam912/docker-apache-wave/ > > > -- > sophia parafina > drawer of owls

Re: Docker image for Apache Wave?

Yeah, we still work on this. Anyway, what are the issues that prevent you from running wave on windows? On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 12:42 AM Ali Nabavi wrote: > Hey, all. > > I can't find a Docker image for Apache Wave. Is there one? Why or why > not? Seems like it would be

Re: Proposal - Removal of Android Repo

+1 On Sat, Apr 15, 2017 at 2:21 PM Thomas Wrobel wrote: > If he adoption of SwellRT as the main branch for Wave goes ahead, then > that has some sort of Android test client anyway, so this project is > likely both unfinished and redundant. > That said, there's always a

Re: SwellRT update

yep, I agree even if this is painful. +1 On Tue, Mar 21, 2017 at 8:56 PM Zachary Yaro wrote: > +1; I think a lot of us have voiced support over the years for decoupling > the Wave server from its current GUI, and it sounds like this approach > would be a great shift in that

Re: To-do's for graduation

Will do. On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 5:20 PM Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote: > Well im going to be starting my tasks soon, but would appreciate it if > someone can review the current pull request outstanding so that i can fix > it if need be. > > On Mon, 13 Mar 2017

Re: To-do's for graduation

Evan, thanks for compiling the TODOs. @Upayavira - can you please review the list and add items in case some are missing? On Sun, Mar 12, 2017 at 2:59 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Ive hoped on IRC using riot.im so I should be available around the clock. > If you have time it turns

Re: To-do's for graduation

I think I can take care of releasing updated binary version + docker file. On Sat, Mar 11, 2017 at 12:46 PM Pablo Ojanguren wrote: > That todo list LGTM > Thanks Evan > > 2017-03-10 1:04 GMT+01:00 Evan Hughes : > > > Hello all, > > > > I think it's time for

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

> > > discuss graduation? > > > > > > > > Perhaps this question could be put into the board report somehow? > > > > > > > > Upayavira > > > > > > > >> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, at 10:04 AM, Pablo Ojangu

Re: Podling Report Reminder - March 2017

Hi Is there anyone who wants to fill the report for March? On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 5:11 AM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your

Re: participate in development

HI sure, thanks for asking. Please take a look at http://incubator.apache.org/wave/get-involved.html Lately we also allow using GitHub Pull Requests - you can for the GitHub Apache Wave Mirror and use it to submit PR. On Sat, Feb 18, 2017 at 12:20 AM Amir N. Nashat

new committer: Pablo Ojanguren

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wave has invited Pablo Ojanguren to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. Pablo is an active contributor of high quality code and is active within community. He is also one of the main SwellRT developers. Please

Re: 404 page design

dFk4/view?usp=sharing > > > :L hopefully that works for you > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 at 18:39 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Hmm, still I can't see attachments. > > > > On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: >

Re: 404 page design

Hmm, still I can't see attachments. On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:38 AM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > attached the images instead of pasted content and attached mobile view. > > > On Wed, 4 Jan 2017 at 18:33 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi, thanks

Re: 404 page design

Hi, thanks for your efforts! However, I can't see the pic... On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 10:31 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > Hello all, > > Just thought I would post a pic of some of the work Im doing. > > [image: pasted1] > > This is just an default 404 page that the new web

Re: To uberjar or to not uberjar (discussion)

I have some experience using onejar archives for deployment. It mostly worked but we had some issues. it doesn't work well with AOP - in our case we had issues using it with AppDynamics and Kamon. Also, it makes it hard to access configuration files since they are wrapped twice in jars. I guess

Re: Wave under Let's Encrypt

Sounds interesting. On Wed, Dec 7, 2016 at 11:40 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > Just curious if anyone has ran a wave server under Lets Encrypt yet? and if > you had any issues? > > ~ Evan >

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

That's fine, we have time until December 07. Do you have edit rights for the Wiki? If not, you may ask @Upayavira to help. On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:48 PM Pablo Ojanguren <pablo...@gmail.com> wrote: > I will happy to do it but I cant before next Sunday > > 2016-11-30 12:46 GMT+01:

Re: Podling Report Reminder - December 2016

Anyone wants to take on filling the report for December? On Wed, Nov 30, 2016 at 1:42 PM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your

Re: Bad links to waveinabox.net

Ok, removed the broken links. Too bad we have no active demo servers. On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:08 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Ok, I ll find the time to remove broken/invalid links. > > On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:21 PM Zachary Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com> wrote: &g

Re: Stuff and mocking things

monday. > > > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 23:13 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > I ll start with SchedulerTest.java > > > > On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 2:13 PM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > > > >

Re: Stuff and mocking things

now. I cant touch > things again till this time tomorrow so feel free to choose which ones you > want. > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 22:04 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Sure, I guess I can help with this. How we coordinate to ensure we don't > > work o

Re: [GitHub] incubator-wave issue #17: Update xerces, gwt and guava dependencies

By the way, maybe we should add pablo as committer? On Tue, Nov 1, 2016 at 1:02 PM wrote: > Also GWT 2.8 has been released xD > > googlewebtoolkit.blogspot.com.es/2016/10/gwt-28-released.html?m=1 > > El 1 nov. 2016 4:55 a. m., wisebaldone escribió: > >

Re: Bad links to waveinabox.net

Ok, I ll find the time to remove broken/invalid links. On Tue, Oct 4, 2016 at 11:21 PM Zachary Yaro wrote: > WaveInABox.net used to host an Apache Wave demo instance, but presumably > the domain expired and someone else bought it up. Those links were correct > at the time

Re: Stuff and mocking things

d mockito is the superior one since > its continually maintained. We can even do fancy things like this > http://google.github.io/gwtmockito/ in the future to aid in having the gwt > js library well tested. > > On Thu, 24 Nov 2016 at 21:50 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > >

Re: Stuff and mocking things

Great news, thanks Evan! Regarding mockito - what are the issues? On Thu, Nov 24, 2016 at 1:20 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Hey all, > > Been working on removing old dependencies and updating dependencies as can > be seen here >

Re: Swellrt dependencies and wave dependencies

I pushed SwellRT into Wave repo as a branch. On Sat, Nov 12, 2016 at 1:49 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > Thqnkyou for this, tuesday is my last exam for the year so I should be able > to start removing dependencies then. > > On 11/11/2016 8:11 PM, "Pablo Ojanguren"

Re: Working master branch

Yeah, we need to re-write the OAuth related code - mostly affects the Robot/Gadget apis. I guess I ll start with removing the deprecated oauth libraries and affected code. On Fri, Oct 21, 2016 at 3:14 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > I cant recall if the gwt changes to the release

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

I submitted the report - please review at https://wiki.apache.org/incubator/September2016 I included Pablo's comments. On Wed, Sep 7, 2016 at 2:59 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think the draft is OK, just remove the "new committer" mention - as it > is not new

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

is brought/merged into Wave. This would bring SwellRT active > developers into Wave and it could facilitate use of Wave by new developers > thanks to a new API, removing GWT legacy code. > > > Project Progress since last report > > (TBC, I guess Yuri or Evan can l

Re: Podling Report Reminder - September 2016

Does anyone volunteers to submit the report for Wave? On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 12:47 AM wrote: > Dear podling, > > This email was sent by an automated system on behalf of the Apache > Incubator PMC. It is an initial reminder to give you plenty of time to > prepare your

Re: Getting Involved - Unify the Wave

There's http://www.co-meeting.com/ and also wiab.pro that is now retired but they open sourced their code at https://github.com/vega113/Wiab.pro Actually wiab.pro contains a lot of improvements that can be imported back into Wave. On Mon, Sep 5, 2016 at 7:39 PM Adam John

Re: Retirement

that dominate today. > >> >> > > > >> >> > > -- > >> >> > > http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site. > >> >> > > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story > generator. >

Re: Retirement

After some thought I hate to agree, that at current levels of participation the only rational choice is to decide to retire as we are just wasting Apache Foundation resources without any real hope of graduating. Moreover, there were a few active projects based on Apache Wave that felt little

Re: Ubuntu server setup

gt; Could not resolve com.google.gwt:gwt-codeserver:2.8.0-SNAPSHOT. > > > Could not parse POM > > https://oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/google- > > snapshots/com/google/gwt/gwt-codeserver/2.8.0-SNAPSHOT/gwt- > > codeserver-2.8.0-20160822.055015-328.pom > >

Re: Ubuntu server setup

Hi We have setup instructions in the README file. Basically you need to download the code, build and build it with gradle. Also, we have instructions on setting it up with VM. On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 9:54 PM Adam John wrote: > Hm... docker @hegsie ...? > > Thanks, and

Re: Wave Thread Safe

Hi That's great news! Regarding thread safety/multi threading - yeah the methods should be thread safe, but almost all are sync and blocking. In general, i think it is impossible to apply deltas for the same wavelet in several threads as deltas order is important. It is possible to work on several

Re: Building a client.jar since the ANT->Gradle migration

Hi Martin Yes, we have just one jar one, i.e. wave-.jar. Anyways, I don't think it was intended. I guess the right would be to put the corresponding sources in different subproject so we can publish the client artifact independently. @Evan, what you think? On Tue, Jun 7, 2016 at 6:34 PM Martin

Re: Oauth consumer

Yeah, there's an issue for this - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-440. On Sun, Jun 5, 2016 at 5:34 PM Ben Hegarty wrote: > Hey guys, > > Has anyone noticed that the above jar file is no longer available on the > web? > > I tried to do a clean build and it failed at

Re: June 2016 - Incubator Report Timeline

Hi I filled in the report for Wave, please review. @Upayavira - please review/sign. On Thu, May 26, 2016 at 3:06 AM John D. Ament wrote: > June 2016 Incubator report timeline: > > http://wiki.apache.org/incubator/June2016 > > Wed June 01 -- Podling reports due by

Re: Stuff this Month (so far)

Thanks for the update Evan! While the project is moving a bit too slow, I think we managed successfully to modernize it: - Replaced the old configuration system with Typesafe config - which made it a lot easier to add new configurations and to override existing. - Replaced the old build system

Re: Jenkins builds

I changed the jdk it uses to run the job to java 8, but it still failed cause it couldn't find where to download some dependency. I think it wad oauth-consumer On Fri, 13 May 2016 at 13:39, Evan Hughes wrote: > Hello all, > > does anyone know what we can do about java 8

New committer - Evan Hughes

The Project Management Committee (PMC) for Apache Wave has asked Evan Hughes to become a committer and we are pleased to announce that he has accepted. In fact that happened a few months ago, but I forgot to send the announcement email. Evan already made significant contributions - like moving

Re: Website - Wavy thoughts?

y 2016 at 17:03 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Umm, not sure about design, but I guess it would be nice to showcase the > > use of gadgets/robots. And maybe to mention that we have robot/gadgets > API. > > > > On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:58 AM Evan Hughes

Re: Website - Wavy thoughts?

Hmm, looks like you forgot to add attachments? On Wed, May 4, 2016 at 9:45 AM Evan Hughes wrote: > Just wondering if anyone had thoughts on this design? > > note: the "ave in a box" screenshot is actually a webm/animated gif. > > ~ Evan > > [image: wave-top.png][image:

Re: XMPP

Let's just remove the federation along with xmpp. On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 2:58 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Hello all, > > seems the wave build is failing on XMPP tests, I am unfamiliar with this > and need some assistance. Errors should occur on any fresh copy (tried it > myself

Re: Github pull requests discussion

I see, nice :) On Sun, Apr 24, 2016 at 6:39 PM Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > Regarding #1 see the commits I pushed today. > On 25/04/2016 12:58 AM, "Yuri Z" <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think we can try it. > > I see a few cons though:

Re: Github pull requests discussion

I think we can try it. I see a few cons though: 1. I don't know how to make the asfgit close abandoned pull requests. 2. There's no integration between Jira and github pull requests. 3. There's no link to code review that we can out into commit message, thus providing context for the change. This

Re: Persistence via git (Was: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension)

erally file transfers > but that incurrs more costs compared to a database solution like cassandra. > > On Thu, 21 Apr 2016 at 19:15 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > We don't need any kind of proof, as long as the wave server signed the > > delta - it i

Re: Persistence via git (Was: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension)

to decide which signature it trusts - or at least this is the way the federation is supposed to work currently. On Thu, Apr 21, 2016 at 11:18 AM Andreas Kotes <count-apache@flatline.de> wrote: > Hi Yuri, > > On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 09:35:57AM +, Yuri Z wrote: > >

Re: Should we remove Federation?

> works > >> and not an issue with the transport or XMPP. > >> > >> ~Michael > >> > >> > >> > >> On 4/10/16, 4:14 AM, "Pablo Ojanguren" <pablo...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >> >I

Re: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension

good (even it replicates data), the issues is the transport, so I suggest > to try Matrix.org as replacement of XMPP. I will look into it in following > weeks, and I am trying to get someone in SwellRT's GSoC to work on that > during summer > > 2016-04-19 11:35 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z &l

Re: Should we remove Federation? Wave as XEP/XMMP Extension

I was thinking about Federation via persistence level. In particular when all the content persisted into database, but the database is decentralized (like bitcoin blockchain). The content though is encrypted. Each wave is encrypted with a new key. Whenever a participant is added to the wave -

Re: Should we remove Federation?

Ok, for some reason you were not added to project contributors. Added you now and assigned the issue. On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:49 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > (try to log in) > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 2:44 PM Pablo Ojanguren <pablo...@gmail.com> >

Re: Should we remove Federation?

t; > > Probably an alternative for XMPP could be matrix.org, at first sight, > > it > > > seems right for wave federation. I could try it. > > > > > > 2016-04-10 13:26 GMT+02:00 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com>: > > > > > > > Well, I don't know.

Re: Should we remove Federation?

rk LLC > Social Media Strategist | The Leather Foundation > Contractor, The Talener Group > > In real open source, you have the right to control your own destiny. – > Linus Torvalds > > On Sun, Apr 10, 2016 at 4:20 AM, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > it is

Re: Should we remove Federation?

;http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site. > >http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator. > > > > > >On 8 April 2016 at 00:10, Evan Hughes <ehu...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Removing the current implementation is fine, I see no problems with >

Re: Should we remove Federation?

ser expectation standpoint, I do think the same needs > > are there - a new federated, open, protocol to deal with today's web. > > - sigh - > > -- > > http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site. > > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story genera

Should we remove Federation?

Hi Currently the federation is broken and requires a significant effort to fix. Moreover, it never worked perfectly and always was a kind of Proof Of Concept version. I doubt we can improve the current implementation to be something stable. Therefore I suggest to remove from Wave source all code

Re: March 2016 Report

we still need the mentor to sign... On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 at 12:15, Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote: > Looks good, I got granted the karma dis-morning so Ill be able to do the > next one for ya. > > On Tue, 5 Apr 2016 at 03:50 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote:

Re: March 2016 Report

r us to fill in ahah, maybe we have been forgotten :'( > > > On Sun, 3 Apr 2016 at 03:40 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > Or maybe Upayvira can grant you access? > > > > On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:39 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > &

Re: Susbcribe

Hi Please find instructions on how to subscribe to the wave-dev mailing list at http://incubator.apache.org/wave/mailing-lists.html On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 3:10 PM Gaurav Shukla wrote: > -- > Regards ! > Gaurav Shukla > gauravshukla.xyz > > > > > Sent with MailTrack > < >

Re: March 2016 Report

Or maybe Upayvira can grant you access? On Sat, Apr 2, 2016 at 8:39 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Can you request access on apache-general? > > On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:01 PM Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> woops >> >&

Re: March 2016 Report

Can you request access on apache-general? On Thu, Mar 10, 2016 at 1:01 PM Evan Hughes <wisebald...@apache.org> wrote: > woops > > On Thu, 10 Mar 2016 at 20:43 Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I think we forgot to report this month > > > >

Fwd: April 2016 Report Timeline

Hi We missed the March report, so we are expected to fill in the April report. Anyone is up for the task? -- Forwarded message - From: John D. Ament Date: Wed, Mar 30, 2016 at 3:46 AM Subject: April 2016 Report Timeline To: gene...@incubator.apache.org

Re: I HEREBY SUBSCRIBE TO THE WAVE DEVELOPER MAILING LIST

Did you follow instructions at http://incubator.apache.org/wave/mailing-lists.html ? On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 10:38 AM Alberto Pérez wrote: > And I want to unsubscribe and it's impossible > :-( > > ApC > > El viernes, 11 de marzo de 2016, Adam Bielski

Re: A Wavy Future

l > changes, > >> and to have API to allow you to drive remote changes into it. > >> > > >> > The point being that, the conversation renderer and rich text editor > is > >> a very non-trivial component, if the assumption is to

Re: Speed issues of wiab resolved and open sourced on github

Hi Kirill Great news, thanks! I think those were the main issues with Apache Wave. Hopefully your contributions will allow us to fix those issues and make Apache Wave faster and more stable. On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 1:59 PM Kirill Kostyuchenko wrote: > Hello developers! > >

Re: A Wavy Future

nly know the basics of OT and am vaguely remembering a > conversation about realtime blip editing adding complexity to things. > > -- > http://lostagain.nl <-- our company site. > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator. > > > On 15 March 2016 at 1

Re: A Wavy Future

gain.nl <-- our company site. > http://fanficmaker.com <-- our, really,really, bad story generator. > > > On 15 March 2016 at 15:48, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Yeah, we need to re-use the existing editor. Patches would be great! > > > > On Tue, Mar

Re: A Wavy Future

> >> > 20:23 poniedziałek, 2016-3-14, Zachary Yaro <zmy...@gmail.com >> > <javascript:;>> napisał(a): >> > >> > >> > I am inclined to agree with Yuri—if the alternative implementation can >> be >> > developed in parallel around

Re: A Wavy Future

I think that more "wavy" projects are nice, but IMO it doesn't mean we should abandon Apache Wave as it is now. I agree there are a lot of issues with current code, but I think there's still value as people can see what Wave can potentially be. On Sun, Mar 13, 2016 at 8:46 AM Evan Hughes

Re: March 2016 Report

I think we forgot to report this month On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 9:16 PM Marvin Humphrey wrote: > Greetings, {podling} developers! > > This is a reminder that your report is due next Wednesday, March > 2nd. Details below. > > Best, > > Marvin Humphrey, Report Manager for

Re: incubator-wave git commit: update gradle wrapper to v2.11, update shadowJar plugin to 1.2.3

Congrats on your karma Evan! On Sun, Feb 21, 2016 at 7:20 AM, wrote: > Repository: incubator-wave > Updated Branches: > refs/heads/master d554a0287 -> 02f2dd5e6 > > > update gradle wrapper to v2.11, update shadowJar plugin to 1.2.3 > > > Project:

[VOTE] [RESULT] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

documentation for an install can be found on > > https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WAVE/Install+WIAB > > > > Thank you for your consideration, > > > > count > > > > On Sun, Jan 31, 2016 at 02:26:37PM +, Yuri Z wrote:

Re: [VOTE] Apache Wave Release 0.4.0-incubating (RC10)

So far we got: +1 binding from Justin Mclean +1 from Ian Dunlop +1 binding from John D. Ament Unless I missed someone we still need +1 binding. On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 11:58 AM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > Thanks! > > On Tue, Jan 19, 2016 at 5:10 AM John D. Ament <joh

Re: static code analysis

be causing an issue, If you find > >> something I'ld gladly hunt it down. > >> > >> On 27 December 2015 at 16:54, Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> > >>> I think jdk 1.8 causes issues when compiling the source. > >>> > >>

Re: PST tool, tutorials wanted

There were some instructions in the build.xml. I am not sure. Don't think it's high priority anyway. On Sun, Jan 3, 2016 at 4:04 PM Evan Hughes wrote: > Was wondering if anyone has spare time to write some tutorials for the pst > tool. > > On another note is org.apache.wave.*

Re: [RESULT][VOTE] Wave 0.4.0-rc10

Ok, we have Ians vote! On Sat, Dec 26, 2015 at 1:17 PM Yuri Z <vega...@gmail.com> wrote: > I think Ian already figured out his issues. The first one - he had to use > jdk1.7 - the second one - you had first to compile with ant before > importing the project into Eclipse. Anyw

  1   2   3   4   5   6   >