So, if we have a consensus, I will send the retirement vote email in a few days.
On Wed, Nov 29, 2017 at 11:35 AM Yuri Z <[email protected]> wrote: > Yeah, I think I still have admin permissions for waveprotocol.org > I can add you as admin in can you want to start working on it. > > > On Mon, Nov 27, 2017 at 10:53 PM Zachary Yaro <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Just so I understand, what would be the criteria for the project rejoining >> the Apache Incubator in the future? >> >> For instance, we have had several people (myself included) comment that >> they would become more frequent contributors to the project once the >> server >> and client were sufficiently decoupled that a JavaScript client could be >> worked on separately from the Java GWT client. Should that happen, and >> regular work on the project continue, could the project easily rejoin, or >> would there be a higher barrier to reentry? >> >> >> And on another note, if the project is retired, what happens to the >> documentation and mailing list archives from Apache, and would anything be >> done to help migrate that elsewhere? >> >> (On a related note, do we still have access to waveprotocol.org and the >> related mailing list? That would seem to be the logical place to migrate >> to.) >> >> Zachary Yaro >> >> On 27 November 2017 at 14:43, Dustin Pfannenstiel < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I've set up a repo and organization for the code base on github. >> > https://github.com/TimaeusWave/WaveServer >> > >> > Thanks for the years of support and, well, just everything. >> > >> > DMP >> > >> > > On Nov 27, 2017, at 11:33 AM, Upayavira <[email protected]> wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On Mon, 27 Nov 2017, at 04:46 PM, John D. Ament wrote: >> > >> The in depth "incubator required stuff" is at >> > >> https://incubator.apache.org/guides/retirement.html for review >> > >> >> > >> Basically, >> > >> >> > >> - We have this conversation. Ensure that there's consensus on the >> > future >> > >> of the project. >> > >> - Call a vote. When we call a vote, one of us will send notice to >> > >> incubator. >> > >> - Vote again on general@incubator. >> > >> >> > >> I do want to make sure there are two things abundantly clear: >> > >> >> > >> - Retirement isn't failure. Wave didn't fail as a project. >> > >> - It's better to describe it as "this isn't a good fit as an Apache >> > >> project." Apache projects tend to have at least three people >> available >> > >> at all times, either making changes, merging in changes, or able to >> cut >> > >> releases. >> > > >> > > What John described above is the process from Apache's side. >> > > >> > > The code is publicly available under an Apache License. Any of you can >> > > push your local repo up to GitHub and share it with whoever you like, >> > > using a name that includes the word "Wave", so that would be a step >> > > alongside the more ASF-focussed administrative tasks above. >> > > >> > > Upayavira >> > >> > >> >
