All,
I have some free time to work on some patches. I am somewhat interested on
working on the server side of things, since I have done work on the client
before. I see a few issues with performance and also with persistence. Have
we captured the main issues that need to be addressed
Hi Michael,
I'd say start with persistence.
D
Il giorno 31/gen/2012 21:26, Michael MacFadden
michael.macfad...@gmail.com ha scritto:
All,
I have some free time to work on some patches. I am somewhat interested
on working on the server side of things, since I have done work on the
client
Maybe you can take a look at issue
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WAVE-305
I made several attempts to fix it, but it's a bit elusive. It somehow
related to recent changes, as it didn't happen before with such frequency.
The problem is probably in the connection between client and server,
I hard disabled Websockets on my server looking into this issue, and
whilst it hasn't stopped it, it has certainly reduced its frequency.
- This fits in with the idea of it being related to a communications issue.
When it occurs though, the only solution is a server restart.
As for reproducing
You can reproduce it with the Selenium script. (You would need also this
plugin http://51elliot.blogspot.com/2008/02/selenium-ide-goto.html for
while loop)
Here are my findings regarding this problem:
The message No conversations is actually means that no conversational
wavelets were received
Hi,
What is the current status of Wave persistence? Is a working implementation
expected to be pushed into the main code branch within the near future?
Thanks,
Ryan
Basic file based persistence was pushed more than almost 3 months ago.
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 במאי 2011, at 16:36, Ryan Lester buu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is the current status of Wave persistence? Is a working implementation
expected to be pushed into the main code branch within
wrote:
Basic file based persistence was pushed more than almost 3 months ago.
Sent from my iPhone
On 5 במאי 2011, at 16:36, Ryan Lester buu...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi,
What is the current status of Wave persistence? Is a working
implementation
expected to be pushed into the main code
