[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Jon Haworth
Hi, if you set table {height:100%} it will expand with the window; however, if you do not have the body {margin-left:0; margin-top:0} set, it will not go all the way to the top of the window. Also, the table's bottom edge stops short, about 1/4 from the bottom. Have you tried setting the

[wdvltalk] JSP Editor

2003-02-07 Thread Rajput, Goutam
I have to bench mark various JSP Editors, any suggestion would be appreciated.. Thanks • The WDVL Discussion List from WDVL.COM • To Join wdvltalk, Send An Email To: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Send Your Posts To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To change subscription settings to the wdvltalk

[wdvltalk] Re: Insert Logo

2003-02-07 Thread Furry, Tim
Sherry wrote: I have a question related to Maverick's dilemma: If you are writing tables for NN 4.7X, is it better to do this logo/header sort of insert via CSS or SSI? I won't be using ASP. I'm working my way up to actually *doing* something here. I'm sure you'll all faint if I ever actually

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Amanda Birmingham
Hello, I'm pretty sure that the height = '100%' and style = 'height: 100%' do *NOT* work any longer in the newer IEs (like IE6) and newer Netscapes (like 7). This is based on my experience with a site I worked on a while ago (www.jeremypeirce.com) that uses a table to layout the page elements

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Alida Saxon
I tried doing a google on if table height was vaild, but I couldn't seem to find anything clear, and I often get a migrane when trying to find a clear quick answer at the W3C. So... I pulled out my O'Reilly HTML XHTML The Definitive Guide and part of what it says is about the height attribute:

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Amanda Birmingham
Ali, Thanks, but as I mentioned earlier, the problem I'm seeing is not just with the nonstandard height attribute: I get exactly the same results when using the style attribute, as in style = 'height: 100%'--which is (AFAIK) perfectly legal for XHTML and CSS. The newer netscape and IE don't

[wdvltalk] Re: re Expanding tables: CODE

2003-02-07 Thread SanJoseWebGuy
After my first post, I sat to task and worked it out. I sent a off-list email to myncs and will post the code below. It works with MSIE and should be bendable to apply cross-browser. Essentially, it's javascript which changes the table-height variable dynamically onResize of the browser

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Stephen Caudill
Amanda, I am working on a project right now that uses (smack my hand) height=100% on the table and IE6 displays it fine. see: http://mechavox.com/athena/ All the gecko browsers ignore it, as they should, but I agree, if they are going to ignore the nonstandard stuff, then at least let us

[wdvltalk] StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread Bill Mais
I have been lurking around the site for awhile and have picked up many thoughts, ideas and tidbits of info. Thanks! I have a site that has some heavy-duty reporting. The user can limit the records returned by making choices from several lists. I take these choices and assemble the WHERE clause

[wdvltalk] Re: StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread rudy
Is there a way to pass in the entire WHERE clause as a parameter? yeah, but then there's no point in using a stored procedure, because the advantage of the stored procedure is that the database can figure it out ahead of time (compile it, as it were), and if the retrieval condition columns are

[wdvltalk] Re: StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread Bill Mais
Thanks rudy, you have a very clear way of explaining things. It makes sense the sp can only be compiled if it is complete. I should have said IN not LIKE but I am sure the same things apply. I will check the indexes again and also see if we can archive some stuff. Bill -Original

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread Amanda Birmingham
Stephen, Thanks very much--your example works most beautifully! Time to do the dance of web designer joy :) Have some well-deserved fun at the pub! Amanda Birmingham At 05:10 PM 2/7/2003 -0500, you wrote: I'm back! I just did a search on Netscapes help site and turned up some interesting

[wdvltalk] Re: StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread darren
On Friday, February 7, 2003 at 23:16, Bill Mais wrote: BM It makes sense the sp can only be compiled if it is complete. the stored procedure will be compiled, but will be recompiled on each use as the sql changed. this means that the database can't use the execution plan it has calculated for

[wdvltalk] Re: StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread rudy
It makes sense the sp can only be compiled if it is complete. actually, it can be compiled as long as it has some idea of what will happen for example, WHERE foo = @param the compiler knows that a value will be substituted at run time it knows that foo has an index, so it knows it can

[wdvltalk] Re: Expanding tables

2003-02-07 Thread David Blakey
Thanks, but as I mentioned earlier, the problem I'm seeing is not just with the nonstandard height attribute: I get exactly the same results when using the style attribute, as in style = 'height: 100%'--which is (AFAIK) perfectly legal for XHTML and CSS. The newer netscape and IE don't seem

[wdvltalk] Re: StoredProcedures

2003-02-07 Thread sherry young
Working late, rudy? Or is it early in your neighbourhood? Sherry from New Hampshire (11:30 EST) rudy wrote: Is there a way to pass in the entire WHERE clause as a parameter? yeah, but then there's no point in using a stored procedure, because the advantage of the stored procedure is that