Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread Alice Bevan–McGregor
Howdy! On 2011-04-10 19:06:52 -0700, Ian Bicking said: There's a significant danger that you'll be creating a configuration management tool at that point, not simply a web application description. Unless you have the tooling to manage the applications, there's no point having a "standard" fo

Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread Ian Bicking
On Sun, Apr 10, 2011 at 6:40 PM, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote: > On 2011-04-10 16:25:21 -0700, James Mills said: > > +1 too. I would however like to see this idea developed in a generic >> and useable way. ie: No zope/twisted deps or making it fit around >> Django :) >> Ideally it should be useable

Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread James Mills
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 9:40 AM, Alice Bevan–McGregor wrote: > The following are the collected ideas of myself and a few other users in the > WebCore chat room: > >        https://gist.github.com/911991 A couple of comments: 4. It would be nice to also support web applications that provide their

Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread Alice Bevan–McGregor
On 2011-04-10 16:25:21 -0700, James Mills said: +1 too. I would however like to see this idea developed in a generic and useable way. ie: No zope/twisted deps or making it fit around Django :) Ideally it should be useable by the most basic (plain old WSGI). The following are the collected idea

Re: [Web-SIG] A Python Web Application Package and Format

2011-04-10 Thread James Mills
+1 too. I would however like to see this idea developed in a generic and useable way. ie: No zope/twisted deps or making it fit around Django :) Ideally it should be useable by the most basic (plain old WSGI). cheers James -- -- James Mills -- -- "Problems are solved by method" _