Re: [Web-SIG] Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)

2011-01-20 Thread Andrey Popp
Hello, while PEP- declared as "final" (not sure if it means the same as "accepted"), I would like to draw your attention at this bug report[1]. Personally, I'd like to fix PEP in the way it resolves mentioned bug. But if you disagree with me, I'd like at least to add note about statements l

Re: [Web-SIG] Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)

2011-01-20 Thread James Y Knight
On Jan 20, 2011, at 6:17 AM, Andrey Popp wrote: > Hello, > > while PEP- declared as "final" (not sure if it means the same as > "accepted"), I would like to draw your attention at this bug report[1]. > > Personally, I'd like to fix PEP in the way it resolves mentioned bug. -1. I think the r

Re: [Web-SIG] Declaring PEP 3333 accepted (was: PEP 444 != WSGI 2.0)

2011-01-20 Thread P.J. Eby
At 09:45 AM 1/20/2011 -0500, James Y Knight wrote: But I agree, a clarification could be added to the statement '''all objects referred to in this specification as "strings" must be of type str or StringType''' and '''For values referred to in this specification as "bytestrings" [...] the value